DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
544 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
544 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The court discusses the preclusion of testimony from witnesses Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards on 401/403 grounds, allowing the defense to release them. Additionally, the court addresses a government objection to a defense exhibit regarding a 1996 sale agreement for the defendant's home at 44 Kinnerton Street in London.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Glassman | Witness/Attorney |
His testimony is discussed regarding the impeachment of 'Jane'.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Subject of potential impeachment regarding motive to testify or contradiction.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Government) |
Representing the government, confirmed no questions.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (Defense) |
Seeking clarification on precluded witnesses to release them.
|
| Mr. Scarola | Potential Witness |
Testimony precluded by the court; released from appearing.
|
| Mr. Edwards | Potential Witness |
Testimony precluded by the court; released from appearing.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on preclusions and objections.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Confirming the trial mark for the London home exhibit.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Referenced regarding ownership of the London home (implicitly Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| Government |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach and regarding an objection.
|
Timeline (2 events)
August 10, 2022
Court hearing regarding witness testimony and evidence admissibility in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the defendant's home, subject of a sale agreement exhibit dated 1996.
|
Relationships (2)
Glassman's testimony is being used to impeach Jane.
Both are being precluded and released from testifying at the same time.
Key Quotes (4)
"the jury could find that Mr. Glassman's testimony tends to impeach Jane either as to motive to testify or impeachment by contradiction or both."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
Quote #1
"You're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
Quote #2
"Yes, on the 401/403 grounds."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
Quote #3
"There's a government objection to preclude, pursuant to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44 Kinnerton Street dated 1996."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,619 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 5 of 246 2300
LCGVMAX1
LCGVMAX1
1 inference, the jury could find that Mr. Glassman's testimony
2 tends to impeach Jane either as to motive to testify or
3 impeachment by contradiction or both. So that is my guidance
4 on the issue of the attorney -- the witness attorney testimony.
5 Any questions?
6 MR. ROHRBACH: None from the government, your Honor.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: I just want to be clear, your Honor.
8 You're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and
9 Mr. Edwards.
10 THE COURT: Yes.
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: The only reason I'm asking that
12 question is we can release them and not have them appear.
13 THE COURT: Yes, on the 401/403 grounds.
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood.
15 And that may speed things up a little bit here, since
16 we're releasing a couple of witnesses.
17 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.
18 All right. Making progress.
19 There's a government objection to preclude, pursuant
20 to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale
21 agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44
22 Kinnerton Street dated 1996. Does that have a trial mark for
23 identification, that exhibit?
24 MR. EVERDELL: It does now, I believe, your Honor.
25 THE COURT: Okay. Just in time.
2 tends to impeach Jane either as to motive to testify or
3 impeachment by contradiction or both. So that is my guidance
4 on the issue of the attorney -- the witness attorney testimony.
5 Any questions?
6 MR. ROHRBACH: None from the government, your Honor.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: I just want to be clear, your Honor.
8 You're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and
9 Mr. Edwards.
10 THE COURT: Yes.
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: The only reason I'm asking that
12 question is we can release them and not have them appear.
13 THE COURT: Yes, on the 401/403 grounds.
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood.
15 And that may speed things up a little bit here, since
16 we're releasing a couple of witnesses.
17 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.
18 All right. Making progress.
19 There's a government objection to preclude, pursuant
20 to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale
21 agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44
22 Kinnerton Street dated 1996. Does that have a trial mark for
23 identification, that exhibit?
24 MR. EVERDELL: It does now, I believe, your Honor.
25 THE COURT: Okay. Just in time.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016488
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document