DOJ-OGR-00008248.jpg

584 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript / legal filing
File Size: 584 KB
Summary

This document is page 4 of a court transcript filed on December 8, 2021, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details a discussion between the Court and defense attorney Ms. Menninger regarding the classification of prospective jurors 226 and 404. The judge outlines the logistics for voir dire, planning to call back 231 prospective jurors in groups of 50 per day to seat a final qualified pool of 50 to 60.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Defense)
Confirming the defense's objection regarding specific jurors to the Court.
The Court Judge
Presiding over jury selection logistics and ruling on juror lists.
Law Clerk Court Staff
Instructed by the Court to hand out the updated juror list to both parties.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Transcription service listed in footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (inferred from footer DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2021-12-08
Jury Selection / Voir Dire Planning
Courtroom (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction implied by the transcription service name.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Menninger Legal Counsel / Judge The Court
Dialogue in transcript ('Yes, your Honor').

Key Quotes (4)

"defense now wants to include in its defense objects but the government doesn't is 226 and 404."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008248.jpg
Quote #1
"231 prospective jurors for whom we agree should be called back for voir dire."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008248.jpg
Quote #2
"The way we're going to do it is we are going to aim for 50 jurors a day, a morning session and afternoon session"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008248.jpg
Quote #3
"that list of 231, my assumption is that that will get us to the 50 to 60 qualified that I'm planning on."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008248.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,494 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 529 Filed 12/08/21 Page 4 of 18 4
LBF3MAXC
1 defense now wants to include in its defense objects but the
2 government doesn't is 226 and 404.
3 Is that right, Ms. Menninger.
4 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.
5 THE COURT: We'll move those two out of the agreed to
6 list and into the list of those for whom the defense objects
7 but the government doesn't.
8 Okay? Everybody understand where we are?
9 So, by my count then, making those changes, we have
10 231 prospective jurors for whom we agree should be called back
11 for voir dire. I believe that's a sufficient number to get to
12 the number of jurors that we need, so that's the list of jurors
13 that we will proceed to call back.
14 The way we're going to do it is we are going to aim
15 for 50 jurors a day, a morning session and afternoon session,
16 so we're breaking it so people aren't sitting around all day.
17 We'll direct a certain number to come in the morning, a certain
18 number to come in the afternoon. We'll get into the specific
19 logistics in a moment. But, that list of 231, my assumption is
20 that that will get us to the 50 to 60 qualified that I'm
21 planning on.
22 We have produced a list of those numbers with the
23 changes that I just noted, so the parties' agreed list with the
24 changes that I've just noted, so that gets us to the 231. I'll
25 ask my law clerk to hand that list out to both sides. And
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00008248

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document