DOJ-OGR-00021029.jpg
547 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
547 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 28, 2023, likely from the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). Defense counsel (Mr. Everdell) argues that evidence of money moving to buy a helicopter does not prove the defendant's continued criminal involvement, comparing it to pilot Larry Visoski holding assets for Epstein without being a co-conspirator. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) counters that the financial evidence was introduced to refute the claim that the defendant had 'moved on' from her association with Epstein.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Larry Visoski | Epstein's Pilot/Employee |
Mentioned in testimony as keeping assets (cars) in his name for Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Financier/Offender |
Referred to as 'Mr. Epstein'; discussion regarding his assets and associates.
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Argues that financial transactions prove the defendant remained a close associate of Epstein.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Argues that financial evidence (helicopter purchase) does not prove criminal involvement, drawing a parallel to Visoski.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking questions about sentencing guidelines 3(b)(1).
|
| The Defendant | Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) |
Implied subject of the hearing; prosecution argues she had not 'moved on' from Epstein.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| Government |
Referenced by the defense regarding their arguments.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by footer 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2023-02-28
Court Hearing (Appeal or Sentencing related)
Southern District of New York (implied)
Relationships (2)
Testimony that Visoski kept assets of cars in his name for Epstein.
Prosecution argues evidence established she remained a close associate for many years.
Key Quotes (3)
"We heard testimony from Larry Visoski that he often kept assets of cars in his name for Mr. Epstein. That doesn't make Larry Visoski a participant in the criminal endeavors."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021029.jpg
Quote #1
"I think it's a stretch for the government to point to that as some sort of evidence of continued involvement or continued profit after the end date of the conspiracy."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021029.jpg
Quote #2
"contrary to the assertion that the defendant had moved on and was no longer associated with Epstein, the trial evidence established that she remained a close associate for many years"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021029.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,526 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page203 of 221
A-403
A-403
28
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 your Honor. If the Court remembers the record evidence, there
2 was some evidence of money moving, but it was to buy a
3 helicopter that was not for her. We heard testimony from Larry
4 Visoski that he often kept assets of cars in his name for
5 Mr. Epstein. That doesn't make Larry Visoski a participant in
6 the criminal endeavors. I think it's a stretch for the
7 government to point to that as some sort of evidence of
8 continued involvement or continued profit after the end date of
9 the conspiracy. I just wanted to make that one point, your
10 Honor.
11 THE COURT: Anything on that, Ms. Moe?
12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the financial
13 transaction, we offered that along with other evidence to
14 refute the claim that the defendant had moved on, which, as we
15 noted, is an expression that has no legal meaning. And so
16 contrary to the assertion that the defendant had moved on and
17 was no longer associated with Epstein, the trial evidence
18 established that she remained a close associate for many years,
19 and that is the purpose for which we offered that evidence.
20 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
21 I do want to address -- do you have other -- I want to
22 ask about 3(b)(1).
23 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
24 THE COURT: I think it's for the government. So as I
25 see the question here, the guidelines require me to find that
2 was some evidence of money moving, but it was to buy a
3 helicopter that was not for her. We heard testimony from Larry
4 Visoski that he often kept assets of cars in his name for
5 Mr. Epstein. That doesn't make Larry Visoski a participant in
6 the criminal endeavors. I think it's a stretch for the
7 government to point to that as some sort of evidence of
8 continued involvement or continued profit after the end date of
9 the conspiracy. I just wanted to make that one point, your
10 Honor.
11 THE COURT: Anything on that, Ms. Moe?
12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the financial
13 transaction, we offered that along with other evidence to
14 refute the claim that the defendant had moved on, which, as we
15 noted, is an expression that has no legal meaning. And so
16 contrary to the assertion that the defendant had moved on and
17 was no longer associated with Epstein, the trial evidence
18 established that she remained a close associate for many years,
19 and that is the purpose for which we offered that evidence.
20 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
21 I do want to address -- do you have other -- I want to
22 ask about 3(b)(1).
23 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
24 THE COURT: I think it's for the government. So as I
25 see the question here, the guidelines require me to find that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. ...
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021029
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document