DOJ-OGR-00009852.jpg
688 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / media article excerpt
File Size:
688 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court filing containing an excerpt of an interview with a juror named David regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains to 'The Independent' why the jury acquitted Maxwell on 'count two' related to accuser Jane, citing a lack of direct evidence for 'enticement' across state lines despite believing the victim. The text also highlights corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Epstein's 'little black book,' which contained names of victims alongside 'mom' and 'dad,' as well as Palm Beach police officers listed familiarly.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David | Juror |
Interviewee discussing the jury's deliberation process and verdict reasoning with The Independent.
|
| Jane | Victim/Accuser |
Accuser involved in 'count two'; listed in flight logs and the black book.
|
| Carolyn | Victim/Accuser |
Name listed in Epstein's 'little black book' as a masseuse.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the trial; accused of enticing victims.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Perpetrator |
Owner of the 'little black book'; close associate of Maxwell.
|
| Jane's high school boyfriend | Witness |
Corroborated Jane's story regarding knowledge of Epstein.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Independent | Media Outlet |
News organization that interviewed the juror, David.
|
| Palm Beach Police | Law Enforcement |
Officers from this department were listed on a first-name basis in Epstein's black book.
|
| DOJ | Government Agency |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
|
Location where the 'little black book' was found.
|
|
|
Location associated with police officers listed in the black book.
|
Relationships (3)
Juror convinced by the closeness of their relationship and her key role in his life.
Flight logs placed Jane on at least one flight with Maxwell.
Listed on a first-name basis in the 'little black book'.
Key Quotes (5)
"Professional masseuses do not need their parents with them."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009852.jpg
Quote #1
"We simply didn’t see enough direct evidence to convict on count two"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009852.jpg
Quote #2
"It wasn’t about not believing Jane."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009852.jpg
Quote #3
"I personally was willing to find her guilty on count two... But we all decided in the end that there wasn't enough evidence."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009852.jpg
Quote #4
"Those girls’ names and phone numbers were listed next to the words ‘mom’ and ‘dad’"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009852.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,765 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643-1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 5 of 6
Jane’s story was backed up by her high school boyfriend, who
remembered being told about Epstein when they were younger.
remembered being told about Epstein when they were younger.
The accuser’s stories were backed up by flight logs which placed Jane on
at least one flight with Maxwell, David said.
at least one flight with Maxwell, David said.
Their stories were backed up by Maxwell’s “little black book” – an address
book found in Epstein’s home that listed the names of “masseuses”
including Jane and Carolyn.
book found in Epstein’s home that listed the names of “masseuses”
including Jane and Carolyn.
David said the little black book also gave the jurors clues about how
Maxwell and Epstein had evaded accountability in the past. There were
names of several Palm Beach police officers listed on a first-name basis in
that book, David said.
Maxwell and Epstein had evaded accountability in the past. There were
names of several Palm Beach police officers listed on a first-name basis in
that book, David said.
“Those girls’ names and phone numbers were listed next to the words
‘mom’ and ‘dad’,” he said. “Professional masseuses do not need their
parents with them.”
‘mom’ and ‘dad’,” he said. “Professional masseuses do not need their
parents with them.”
Many speculated that the jury chose to acquit Maxwell on count two
because that count related solely to Jane, and that Jane was less credible
than other victims.
because that count related solely to Jane, and that Jane was less credible
than other victims.
But David told The Independent that wasn’t the case.
“We simply didn’t see enough direct evidence to convict on count two,”
he said. “It wasn’t about not believing Jane.”
he said. “It wasn’t about not believing Jane.”
Count two was a substantive charge that required proof that Maxwell
“enticed” Jane to travel across state lines. David said there just wasn’t any
direct evidence for any specific trip that Maxwell took any action to entice
Jane to get on those flights.
“enticed” Jane to travel across state lines. David said there just wasn’t any
direct evidence for any specific trip that Maxwell took any action to entice
Jane to get on those flights.
“I personally was willing to find her guilty on count two,” he said. “But we
all decided in the end that there wasn’t enough evidence.”
all decided in the end that there wasn’t enough evidence.”
David also explained that he was convinced by the closeness of Maxwell
and Epstein’s relationship and the key role she played in his life.
and Epstein’s relationship and the key role she played in his life.
DOJ-OGR-00009852
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document