| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Williams
|
Cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Cooperating witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Conflict disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
state attorney
|
Professional conflict |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Police approached State Attorney Krischer for arrest warrants but were told a grand jury would be... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Police search of Epstein's trash and home found phone messages and a high school transcript. | Epstein's Home | View |
| N/A | Evidence transfer | The Palm Beach Police allegedly turned over all seized material to the United States Attorney pur... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Police search of Epstein's trash and home. | Epstein's Palm Beach Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Police surveillance of Epstein's home | Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | 11-month investigation by Palm Beach police into Epstein paying underage girls for massages and s... | El Brillo Way home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interview of victim by Palm Beach Police where she was threatened with charges. | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein was stopped by Palm Beach Police while walking. | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Police surveillance of Epstein's Palm Beach home. | Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Police surveillance of Epstein's home, trash, and jet. | Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| N/A | Evidence recovery | Through trash searches and the search warrant, the Palm Beach Police recovered items relevant to ... | Epstein's residence | View |
| 2025-11-11 | N/A | Police investigation including trash sifting and surveillance | Epstein's Home | View |
| 2007-11-16 | Police investigation | An 11-month police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's activities was conducted. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-08-10 | N/A | 11-month police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-08-10 | N/A | Publication of Palm Beach Post Editorial regarding the Epstein investigation. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-07-01 | N/A | Police release 13-month investigation report. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-07-01 | N/A | Epstein surrendered to police. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-05-01 | N/A | Police department asked prosecutors to approve arrest warrants for Epstein, Kellen, and Robson. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-04-20 | N/A | Execution of search warrant at Epstein's Palm Beach residence. | Epstein's Palm Beach Residence | View |
| 2006-01-20 | N/A | Fax received with identification 'MRC INVESTIGATION IN' | Palm Beach Police Department | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | FBI opened investigation into Jeffrey Epstein at request of Palm Beach Police. | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Epstein indicted after 11-month investigation. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2005-10-01 | N/A | Police executed a search warrant at Epstein's home. | Epstein's home | View |
| 2005-10-01 | N/A | Police interview Haley Robson. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2005-03-01 | N/A | Police start investigating Epstein after stepmother's report. | Palm Beach | View |
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard Berman arguing for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. The Government outlines Epstein's extreme flight risk due to his wealth (over $500 million), international ties (Paris, US Virgin Islands), and access to private aircraft (noting over 20 international flights since 2018). It also details the danger he poses to the community, citing the recent discovery of lewd photos of minors in his home and a history of witness intimidation, including specific wire transfers made to potential witnesses following negative press coverage in late 2018.
This document is a motion filed on June 2, 2009, by The Palm Beach Post seeking to intervene in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein to unseal a non-prosecution agreement and its addendum. The Post argues that the sealing was improper, lacked necessary legal findings, and that the documents are of significant public interest given the accusations of soliciting minors. The document cites numerous civil lawsuits against Epstein and criticizes the secrecy surrounding his plea deal.
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States Solicitor General in July 2025 opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The government argues that the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida does not bar the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, as the agreement was contractually limited to the Florida district and Maxwell was not a party to it. The brief details the history of the Epstein investigation, the terms of the NPA, and relevant legal precedents regarding the scope of plea agreements binding different US Attorney's Offices.
This document is an email dated August 19, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email transmits an attachment titled 'Palm_Beach_Police_Reports.pdf', which the sender describes as an unredacted version of the reports sourced from the FBI.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard Berman, arguing against Jeffrey Epstein's motion for pretrial release. The government details Epstein's extreme flight risk due to his vast wealth (over $500 million), international ties (Paris, Virgin Islands), and private aviation access. It also highlights his danger to the community and obstruction of justice history, citing recent wire transfers to potential witnesses and the discovery of lewd photographs of minors in his home. The government argues that his proposed bail package, including home confinement and private security, is inadequate.
This document is an email thread dated October 15, 2019, forwarding a message from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY). The email discusses a female subject ('her') and attaches 'Palm_Beach_Police_Reports.pdf', noting that the reports contain details about threats and call records associated with her and two redacted individuals. The sender advises the recipient to review these in case they meet with the subject.
This document is a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team objecting to the unsealing of specific docket entries (143, 173, 199, 164, and 230) in the civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre. The defense argues that these documents contain sensitive information regarding non-parties ('Does'), inadmissible hearsay, and prejudicial materials such as flight logs and police reports that were improperly filed to bias the court. The filing emphasizes the need to protect the privacy of non-parties and the integrity of ongoing criminal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's conduct.
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department Case Report and Persons System Report regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, covering investigations from 2001 to 2005. It details intelligence on the recruitment of young female college students from Palm Beach Atlantic College for massages, surveillance of Epstein's residence at 358 El Brillo Way, and numerous trash pulls that yielded sexually suggestive items and correspondence. The report also documents interviews with potential victims and witnesses, noting allegations of inappropriate touching and the presence of underage girls, though some investigations were initially marked as unfounded or for intelligence purposes.
This document is an email containing the full text of a New York Times article from July 19, 2019, detailing Judge Richard M. Berman's decision to deny Jeffrey Epstein bail. The article outlines the judge's reasoning, citing Epstein as a flight risk due to his immense wealth ($559 million in assets) and international properties, and a danger to the community due to his 'uncontrollable' fixation on minors. It also details items found in his safe, including a fake Austrian passport and cash, and alleges witness tampering via wire transfers and threats.
This document is a July 16, 2019 letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Richard Berman providing additional evidence to support Jeffrey Epstein's detention pending trial. It details suspicious wire transfers totaling $350,000 to potential co-conspirators shortly after the Miami Herald published articles about Epstein in late 2018. The letter also discloses the seizure of a foreign passport with a false name but Epstein's photo, over $70,000 in cash, and 48 loose diamonds from a safe in his Manhattan home, arguing these items demonstrate a significant flight risk.
Letter from attorney Roy Black to an Assistant US Attorney regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Black confirms Epstein's employment location and discusses a newly filed civil RICO lawsuit against Scott Rothstein and Brad Edwards, alleging they used litigation against Epstein to fuel a Ponzi scheme. Black specifically notes that Rothstein sought Epstein's flight logs to 'fish for celebrities to extort' and requests a meeting with the AUSA to discuss Epstein's progress.
A 14-page letter from attorney Stephanie D. Thacker to DOJ official John Roth arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Thacker contends the case lacks federal jurisdiction (no interstate travel for illegal purposes, no commercial sex trafficking) and should remain a state matter. She highlights credibility issues with witnesses who admitted to lying about their age and accuses the lead detective of omitting exculpatory evidence in search warrant affidavits.
A Palm Beach Post article dated July 25, 2006, reporting that Jeffrey Epstein was indicted for soliciting prostitutes three or more times between August and October 2005. The article notes the unusual nature of the case going to a grand jury rather than being handled as a misdemeanor, mentions his release on a $3,000 bond, and details his real estate holdings including properties in Manhattan, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. It also identifies his attorney Jack Goldberger and mentions his connection to Alan Dershowitz.
Editorial from The Palm Beach Post dated November 16, 2007, criticizing the potential plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. The article discusses Epstein's high-profile legal team (Goldberger, Dershowitz, Starr), the evidence found by police (including phone messages and a high school transcript in his trash), and the concern that his wealth is allowing him to bypass the justice system despite preying on underage girls. It notes that a previous grand jury indictment for solicitation was seen as insufficient given the age of the victims and mentions that the federal investigation had reportedly stalled the state case.
This document is an editorial from The Palm Beach Post dated November 16, 2007, criticizing the potential plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Epstein, accused of paying underage girls for sex, employed a high-profile legal team including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr to negotiate a deal expected to result in 18 months jail time and sex offender registration, resolving charges from a 2006 indictment. The article expresses concern that Epstein's wealth is allowing him to manipulate the justice system and avoid more serious consequences.
This document is a Fax Activity Log from the Palm Beach Police Department covering the period from December 28, 2005, to January 24, 2006. It lists incoming and outgoing faxes, many of which have redacted identification fields. Visible identifiers include 'FISA', 'Mortgage Dept', and 'MRC INVESTIGATION IN', suggesting communication with specific entities or departments during an active investigation.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson (likely a police officer) by attorney Mr. Everdell. The testimony covers Parkinson's early interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, specifically a burglary investigation in October 2003 and casual encounters seeing Epstein jogging in Palm Beach. It concludes by introducing the topic of a search warrant executed on October 20, 2005.
This court document, filed in July 2019, summarizes evidence of Jeffrey Epstein's obstruction of justice and witness tampering during the 2007 investigation. It details Police Incident Reports alleging Epstein's private investigators aggressively stalked victims' parents, including driving one off the road. The document also cites emails from 2007 showing prosecutors and Epstein's counsel negotiating a plea deal involving statutes related to witness tampering and privacy violations of child victims.
This document is page 15 of a July 2019 court filing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) arguing for Jeffrey Epstein's detention. It highlights the severity of the charges (involving minors) and cites research suggesting sex offender recidivism is underreported. Crucially, it details evidence of witness tampering, including 2007 emails regarding a potential guilty plea for obstruction of justice and a 2006 Palm Beach police report where an Epstein representative allegedly threatened a victim, promising compensation for help and retribution for harm.
This page from a court filing details allegations that Jeffrey Epstein's associates used intimidation tactics, such as aggressive driving, against victims' parents to silence them. It also outlines 2007 plea discussions where federal prosecutors and Epstein's counsel considered charges of witness tampering and obstruction of justice, specifically referencing statutes 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d) and 18 U.S.C. § 403.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the severity of the crimes Mr. Epstein is charged with, citing their heinous nature involving minors. It presents evidence that Mr. Epstein or his representatives engaged in witness intimidation, threats, and made payments to potential witnesses, referencing Florida police reports from 2006 and emails from his former counsel to federal prosecutors in 2007.
This court filing from July 2019 addresses supplemental evidence for Jeffrey Epstein's detention hearing, specifically regarding flight risk. The Government notes the discovery of a foreign passport with Epstein's photo but a different name found in his Manhattan safe, alongside a US passport. The document also references a female co-conspirator (protected by the earlier NPA) and other employees who facilitated the trafficking of minors.
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing addressed to Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman on July 8, 2019, arguing regarding Jeffrey Epstein's bail status. It details Epstein's extreme wealth, including a $77 million Manhattan mansion, a private island in the USVI, and multiple private jets, alongside his possession of three active passports and frequent international travel. The document also summarizes the prior 2005 Florida investigation, the subsequent 2007 non-prosecution agreement with the Southern District of Florida (which the SDNY explicitly notes it did not sign), and his 2008 state conviction.
This document is a legal filing arguing that Jeffrey Epstein poses a danger of obstructing justice. It cites past incidents of intimidation, including a private investigator driving a victim's parent off the road and threats that those who hurt Epstein 'will be dealt with.' It further highlights suspicious financial activity in late 2018, specifically wire transfers totaling $350,000 to possible co-conspirators immediately following the publication of investigative articles by the Miami Herald.
This legal document excerpt details a juror's, named David, perspective on the acquittal of Maxwell on a specific charge ('count two') involving an accuser named Jane. David explains that while Jane's story was corroborated by flight logs and Epstein's 'little black book', the jury ultimately found insufficient direct evidence to prove Maxwell had 'enticed' Jane to travel, which was required for a conviction on that charge. The decision was based on a lack of evidence for that specific action, not on a disbelief of the victim.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity