DOJ-OGR-00017566.jpg
608 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
608 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger regarding the admissibility of testimony from a witness named 'Jane' about her mother. Specifically, Ms. Moe argues to admit statements where Jane's mother reacted negatively to Jane speaking with a guidance counselor, instructing Jane never to talk about what happens in their house; the Court agrees to admit this with a limiting instruction that it is offered for the effect on the listener, not for the truth of the mother's statements.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness |
Subject of the direct examination (referenced in header 'Jane - direct').
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
Prosecutor/Plaintiff attorney examining the witness; arguing for the admissibility of testimony regarding the witness...
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
Defense attorney; raising concerns about hearsay statements.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the evidentiary discussion and issuing rulings.
|
| Jane's Mother | Subject of Testimony |
Allegedly told Jane not to talk about what happens in their house.
|
| Guidance Counselor | Subject of Testimony |
Individual Jane spoke to as a child, triggering her mother's reaction.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by 'DOJ-OGR' stamp).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell context)
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on case number format and reporter name.
|
Relationships (1)
Mother forbade Jane from discussing home life with outsiders.
Key Quotes (3)
"I would give the jury a limiting instruction that the witness's testimony regarding what her mother said is not being offered for the truth of those statements, but for the impact or effect that it had on the witness."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017566.jpg
Quote #1
"I expect to ask the witness whether there was ever a time when she talked to a guidance counselor when she was a kid"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017566.jpg
Quote #2
"told her that she should never talk about what goes on in their house."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017566.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,568 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 204 of 247 332
LBUCmax5 Jane - direct
LBUCmax5 Jane - direct
1 offered for the truth, it's being offered for the effect on the
2 listener. I would give the jury a limiting instruction that
3 the witness's testimony regarding what her mother said is not
4 being offered for the truth of those statements, but for the
5 impact or effect that it had on the witness. We'll keep it
6 limited, Ms. Moe, as to eliciting statements for an
7 out-of-court witness, but with that caveat.
8 And then tell me, Ms. Menninger, what your concern
9 down the road was so I have it in my head.
10 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, if you're admitting it
11 with that limiting instruction, I think we'll take up the
12 issues with other statements by the mom when they come up.
13 THE COURT: Okay.
14 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. Just to preview in
15 order to streamline things because we're on the subject, I
16 expect the next few questions to be about the issue of
17 disclosure. In particular, I expect to ask the witness whether
18 there was ever a time when she talked to a guidance counselor
19 when she was a kid and whether she came to learn that her
20 mother had found out that she talked to the guidance counselor,
21 and I want to talk to her about how her mother reacted to that
22 and told her that she should never talk about what goes on in
23 their house.
24 We're offering that, again, not for the truth of
25 anything, it's certainly not our position that she shouldn't
2 listener. I would give the jury a limiting instruction that
3 the witness's testimony regarding what her mother said is not
4 being offered for the truth of those statements, but for the
5 impact or effect that it had on the witness. We'll keep it
6 limited, Ms. Moe, as to eliciting statements for an
7 out-of-court witness, but with that caveat.
8 And then tell me, Ms. Menninger, what your concern
9 down the road was so I have it in my head.
10 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, if you're admitting it
11 with that limiting instruction, I think we'll take up the
12 issues with other statements by the mom when they come up.
13 THE COURT: Okay.
14 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. Just to preview in
15 order to streamline things because we're on the subject, I
16 expect the next few questions to be about the issue of
17 disclosure. In particular, I expect to ask the witness whether
18 there was ever a time when she talked to a guidance counselor
19 when she was a kid and whether she came to learn that her
20 mother had found out that she talked to the guidance counselor,
21 and I want to talk to her about how her mother reacted to that
22 and told her that she should never talk about what goes on in
23 their house.
24 We're offering that, again, not for the truth of
25 anything, it's certainly not our position that she shouldn't
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017566
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document