EFTA00010965.pdf
44.8 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
44.8 KB
Summary
An email thread from July 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and unknown recipients regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant US Attorney provides the grand jury return for a superseding indictment, noting it is unsealed and was presented to Judge Nathan. A subsequent email requests the immediate docketing of the indictment on ECF to ensure notice is given before the defendant's upcoming arraignment.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the case US v. Maxwell, S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Judge in Manhattan to whom the grand jury return was wheeled out
|
| Redacted | Assistant United States Attorney |
Sender of the email on July 8, 2020
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Attorney's Office |
Southern District of New York
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Jurisdiction of the case
|
|
| ECF |
Electronic Case Files system where the indictment needed to be docketed
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Judge Nathan
|
|
|
Address of the US Attorney's Office
|
Relationships (1)
Grand jury return for US v. Maxwell wheeled out to Judge Nathan
Key Quotes (4)
"This superseding indictment does not appear to have been docketed on ECF."Source
EFTA00010965.pdf
Quote #1
"Would it be possible to please docket it today so that the Court and the defendant have notice of the new indictment before next week's arraignment?"Source
EFTA00010965.pdf
Quote #2
"Attached is the grand jury return for US v. Maxwell, which was previously wheeled out to Judge Nathan in Manhattan."Source
EFTA00010965.pdf
Quote #3
"The superseding indictment is unsealed. There are no warrants for this matter."Source
EFTA00010965.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,213 characters)
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Grand Jury Return - US v. Maxwell, S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:20:22 +0000
Attachments: Maxwell_Superseding_Indictment_-_S1_20_Cr._330_(AJN).pdf
Inline-Images: image001.png
To: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Grand Jury Return - US v. Maxwell, S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:20:22 +0000
Attachments: Maxwell_Superseding_Indictment_-_S1_20_Cr._330_(AJN).pdf
Inline-Images: image001.png
Good morning,
This superseding indictment does not appear to have been docketed on ECF. Would it be possible to please docket it today so that the Court and the defendant have notice of the new indictment before next week's arraignment?
I have attached a color scan of the signed indictment, which can be filed.
Thank you.
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 12:28 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted] < [Redacted] >
Subject: Grand Jury Return - US v. Maxwell, S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 12:28 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted] < [Redacted] >
Subject: Grand Jury Return - US v. Maxwell, S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Good afternoon,
Attached is the grand jury return for US v. Maxwell, which was previously wheeled out to Judge Nathan in Manhattan. The superseding indictment is unsealed. There are no warrants for this matter.
Best Regards,
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
New York, New York 10007
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
New York, New York 10007
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00010965
[Page 2]
[Redacted]
EFTA00010966
[Redacted]
EFTA00010966
[Page 3]
[Redacted]
EFTA00010967
[Redacted]
EFTA00010967
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document