DOJ-OGR-00019413.jpg
426 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document (appellate brief)
File Size:
426 KB
Summary
This document is page 14 of a legal filing from September 24, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's appeals. It outlines the procedural posture of two related appeals: one regarding Judge Preska's order unsealing deposition materials in the civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell), and the current appeal regarding Judge Nathan's denial of a motion to modify a criminal protective order. Maxwell has moved to consolidate these two appeals.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Seeking to modify a protective order and consolidate appeals; subject of the legal proceedings.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Denied Maxwell's motion to modify the criminal protective order.
|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
Issued an order unsealing deposition material in the civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
|
| Giuffre | Plaintiff (Civil Case) |
Named in the case title 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Unknown
Judge Nathan denied motion to modify criminal protective order.
District Court
Relationships (2)
Case title 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'
Maxwell sought to share information between Judge Nathan's court and Judge Preska's court.
Key Quotes (3)
"Judge Nathan denied the motion to modify, though she invited Ms. Maxwell to seek relief from two other judicial officers"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019413.jpg
Quote #1
"Pending before this Court in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413 (2d Cir.), is Ms. Maxwell’s appeal of Judge Preska’s order unsealing the deposition material."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019413.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell has moved to consolidate both appeals. That motion remains pending."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019413.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (761 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page14 of 58
[REDACTED]
Judge Nathan denied the motion to modify, though she invited Ms. Maxwell to seek relief from two other judicial officers, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. App. 99–103.
The appeals.
Pending before this Court in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413 (2d Cir.), is Ms. Maxwell’s appeal of Judge Preska’s order unsealing the deposition material.
This appeal is from Judge Nathan’s order denying Ms. Maxwell’s motion to modify the criminal protective order to share with Judge Preska and this Court in Giuffre v. Maxwell, under seal, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED] App. 121.
Ms. Maxwell has moved to consolidate both appeals. That motion remains pending.
9
DOJ-OGR-00019413
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document