Event Details

February 24, 2022

Description

Document filing date.

Source Documents (4)

DOJ-OGR-00009369.jpg

Court Transcript • 435 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript (page 308) filed on February 24, 2022. A witness, Ms. Brune, is being questioned by Mr. Davis about a mistake in a legal brief regarding the timing of a Google search relative to receiving a letter. The testimony also confirms that David Parse was convicted of two charges and acquitted of four, and that the witness believed the jury rendered a fair verdict.

DOJ-OGR-00013151.jpg

Court Transcript (Cross-Examination) • 454 KB
View

This document is page 138 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The witness denies drinking alcohol or doing drugs and emphatically denies an allegation that Virginia Roberts approached her at a party about making $300. The witness confirms she first spoke to the FBI about Mr. Epstein in 2007. Attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey participate in the procedural handling of evidence binders.

DOJ-OGR-00021043.jpg

Court Transcript / Legal Ruling • 595 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript (likely a sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell) where the judge is ruling on sentencing guidelines. The judge overrules an objection, finding by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant supervised Sarah Kellen, who is identified as a 'knowing participant in the criminal conspiracy.' The ruling cites testimony from Larry Visoski, David Rodgers, and Carolyn, as well as flight records and a household manual, to establish the defendant's leadership role as 'Epstein's number two.'

DOJ-OGR-00019413.jpg

Legal Filing / Court Document (Appellate Brief) • 426 KB
View

This document is page 14 of a legal filing from September 24, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's appeals. It outlines the procedural posture of two related appeals: one regarding Judge Preska's order unsealing deposition materials in the civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell), and the current appeal regarding Judge Nathan's denial of a motion to modify a criminal protective order. Maxwell has moved to consolidate these two appeals.

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
0
Source Documents
4
Extracted
2025-11-20 19:41

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009369.jpg
Date String
February 24, 2022

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event