HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016392.jpg

Extraction Summary

7
People
4
Organizations
10
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Manuscript / essay / book page (evidence exhibit)
File Size:
Summary

This document is a page (p. 172) from a manuscript or essay found in House Oversight documents. It discusses the ethics of 'human subject research' versus animal rights, specifically referencing a 2015 case involving chimpanzees at Stony Brook University. The text explores the concept of 'transhumanism,' contrasting modern technological capabilities (LIGO, GPS, space travel) with uncontacted indigenous tribes, and references a group of scientists and tech figures (Hawking, Musk, Tallinn, Wilczek, Tegmark) in the context of AI safety and autonomous weapons.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Jane Goodall Primatologist
Mentioned regarding claims that chimpanzees have duties/responsibilities.
Hawking Scientist (Stephen Hawking)
Listed as promoting bans on autonomous weapons.
Musk Tech Entrepreneur (Elon Musk)
Listed as promoting bans on autonomous weapons.
Tallinn Tech Entrepreneur (Jaan Tallinn)
Listed as promoting bans on autonomous weapons.
Wilczek Physicist (Frank Wilczek)
Listed as promoting bans on autonomous weapons.
Tegmark Physicist/Cosmologist (Max Tegmark)
Listed as promoting bans on autonomous weapons.
William Gibson Science-fiction author
Quoted regarding the distribution of the future.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Nonhuman Rights Project
Filed a lawsuit in 2015 on behalf of chimpanzees.
New York State Supreme Court
Venue for the 2015 lawsuit.
Stony Brook University
Institution keeping chimpanzees for research.
NBC News
Referenced in the footnote URL.

Timeline (2 events)

2015
Nonhuman Rights Project filed a lawsuit regarding chimpanzee rights.
New York State Supreme Court
Recent (relative to text)
LIGO gravity-wave evidence discovery/celebration.
Global

Locations (10)

Location Context
Location of the Supreme Court mentioned.
Location of Sentinelese and Andamanese peoples.
Location of Korowai people.
Location of Mashco-Piro people.
Location of Pintupi people.
Location of Surma people.
Location of Ruc people.
Location of Ayoreo-Totobiegosode people.
Location of Himba people.
Location of dozens of tribes.

Relationships (3)

Hawking Co-signatories/Activists Musk
Listed together as promoting bans on autonomous weapons.
Musk Co-signatories/Activists Tallinn
Listed together as promoting bans on autonomous weapons.
Wilczek Co-signatories/Activists Tegmark
Listed together as promoting bans on autonomous weapons.

Key Quotes (4)

"chimps are not to be treated as legal persons since they “do not have duties and responsibilities in society,”"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016392.jpg
Quote #1
"As we (e.g., Hawking, Musk, Tallinn, Wilczek, Tegmark) have promoted bans on “autonomous weapons,”"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016392.jpg
Quote #2
"The science-fiction prophet William Gibson said, “The future is already here—it’s just not very evenly distributed.”"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016392.jpg
Quote #3
"The question “What was a human?” has already transmogrified into “What were the many kinds of transhumans? . . . And what were their rights?”"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016392.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,026 characters)

For “human subject research,” we refer to the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki,
keeping in mind the 1932-1972 Tuskegee syphilis experiment, possibly the most
infamous biomedical research study in U.S. history. In 2015, the Nonhuman Rights
Project filed a lawsuit with the New York State Supreme Court on behalf of two
chimpanzees kept for research by Stony Brook University. The appellate court decision
was that chimps are not to be treated as legal persons since they “do not have duties and
responsibilities in society,” despite Jane Goodall’s and others’ claim that they do, and
despite arguments that such a decision could be applied to children and the disabled.46
What prevents extension to other animals, organoids, machines, and hybrids? As
we (e.g., Hawking, Musk, Tallinn, Wilczek, Tegmark) have promoted bans on
“autonomous weapons,” we have demonized one type of “dumb” machine, while other
machines—for instance, those composed of many Homo sapiens voting—can be more
lethal and more misguided.
Do transhumans roam the Earth already? Consider the “uncontacted peoples,”
such as the Sentinelese and Andamanese of India, the Korowai of Indonesia, the Mashco-
Piro of Peru, the Pintupi of Australia, the Surma of Ethiopia, the Ruc of Vietnam, the
Ayoreo-Totobiegosode of Paraguay, the Himba of Namibia, and dozens of tribes in
Papua New Guinea. How would they or our ancestors respond? We could define
“transhuman” as people and culture not comprehensible to humans living in a modern,
yet un-technological culture.
Such modern Stone Age people would have great trouble understanding why we
celebrate the recent LIGO gravity-wave evidence supporting the hundred-year-old
general theory of relativity. They would scratch their heads as to why we have atomic
clocks, or GPS satellites so we can find our way home, or why and how we have
expanded our vision from a narrow optical band to the full spectrum from radio to
gamma. We can move faster than any other living species; indeed, we can reach escape
velocity from Earth and survive in the very cold vacuum of space.
If those characteristics (and hundreds more) don’t constitute transhumanism, then
what would? If we feel that the judge of transhumanism should not be fully paleo-culture
humans but recent humans, then how would we ever reach transhuman status? We
“recent humans” may always be capable of comprehending each new technological
increment—never adequately surprised to declare arrival at a (moving) transhuman
target. The science-fiction prophet William Gibson said, “The future is already here—
it’s just not very evenly distributed.” While this underestimates the next round of
“future,” certainly millions of us are transhuman already—with most of us asking for
more. The question “What was a human?” has already transmogrified into “What were
the many kinds of transhumans? . . . And what were their rights?”
46 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/lawyer-denying-chimpanzees-rights-could-backfire-disabled-
n734566.
172
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016392

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document