Hawking

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
3
Events
0
Documents
3
Also known as:
Steven Hawking

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
3 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Elon Musk
Co signatories activists
5
1
View
organization [REDACTED]
Friend
5
1
View
person Elon Musk
Intellectual advocacy group
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016975.jpg

This document appears to be page 172 of a manuscript or essay included in a House Oversight investigation (likely related to Epstein given the context of scientific philanthropy). The text discusses transhumanism, the definition of legal personhood regarding animals (specifically chimpanzees), and the technological gap between modern society and uncontacted tribes. It references prominent scientists and tech leaders (Musk, Hawking, Tegmark) in the context of AI safety ('autonomous weapons') and questions the future rights of 'transhumans'.

Manuscript/essay page (house oversight investigation document)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027547.jpg

This document is a forensic extraction log of a text message conversation from December 4, 2018, between an individual using the email 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (often linked to Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted sender. The conversation explicitly discusses physicist Steven Hawking, with the redacted sender claiming a girl said she had sex with him, followed by a discussion about his physical appearance and paralysis. The document originates from a House Oversight investigation (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027547).

Digital forensic log / message extraction (house oversight committee)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016392.jpg

This document is a page (p. 172) from a manuscript or essay found in House Oversight documents. It discusses the ethics of 'human subject research' versus animal rights, specifically referencing a 2015 case involving chimpanzees at Stony Brook University. The text explores the concept of 'transhumanism,' contrasting modern technological capabilities (LIGO, GPS, space travel) with uncontacted indigenous tribes, and references a group of scientists and tech figures (Hawking, Musk, Tallinn, Wilczek, Tegmark) in the context of AI safety and autonomous weapons.

Manuscript / essay / book page (evidence exhibit)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity