This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal debate between Ms. Menninger (defense) and Ms. Comey (prosecution) regarding the scope of closing arguments related to impeachment and witness statements. Additionally, Ms. Comey notes that due to rulings on 'Annie Farmer statements,' it is no longer necessary to call AUSA Rossmiller as a witness.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Arguing regarding impeachment arguments and closing statements.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor (AUSA) |
Responding to defense arguments; discussing witness Annie Farmer and AUSA Rossmiller.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion and making rulings on permissible arguments.
|
| Annie Farmer | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned in relation to rulings on her statements.
|
| AUSA Rossmiller | Potential Witness/Assistant US Attorney |
Discussed as no longer being relevant to call as a witness.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp prefix DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and reporters.
|
"THE COURT: That is way more metaphysical than I can handle at this moment."Source
"MS. MENNINGER: I think impeachment is for the truth, your Honor."Source
"MS. COMEY: Obviously it's not for the truth, it's for impeachment, but no objection to that argument."Source
"MS. COMEY: ...there is no longer any relevance for calling AUSA Rossmiller as a witness..."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,376 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document