AUSA Rossmiller
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JANE
|
Prosecutor witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Glassman
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Glassman
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-18 | Court hearing | Bond Hearing for Jeffrey Epstein was held. The court denied bail. A written order was to follow. ... | Court | View |
| 2019-07-18 | N/A | Bond Hearing | Judge Richard M. Berman's C... | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Bail Hearing | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008385.jpg
A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter argues that the government used suggestive questioning techniques on accusers, specifically citing an instance where a witness named 'Jane' changed her testimony regarding a trip to New York and seeing 'The Lion King' after pressure from AUSA Rossmiller. The defense uses this to justify the necessity of expert testimony from Dr. Loftus regarding memory and suggestive questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00008371.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that certain communications related to a claimant named 'Jane' are not protected by attorney-client privilege. The argument is based on her representative, Mr. Glassman, sharing her statements and settlement demands with third parties, including the government, the EVCP, and Ms. Maxwell's counsel. The document details specific financial demands, such as a $25 million demand and a $5 million offer, to demonstrate that these communications were not confidential.
DOJ-OGR-00008370.jpg
This legal document, dated December 13, 2021, argues that testimony from attorney Robert Glassman is not protected by attorney-client privilege. It focuses on a discrepancy in a witness's ('Jane') memory, where she claimed Mr. Epstein took her to see 'The Lion King' on Broadway in 1994, three years before it premiered. The document details communications between AUSA Rossmiller and Mr. Glassman where the government pointed out the error, but Jane insisted her story was correct.
DOJ-OGR-00016757.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal debate between Ms. Menninger (defense) and Ms. Comey (prosecution) regarding the scope of closing arguments related to impeachment and witness statements. Additionally, Ms. Comey notes that due to rulings on 'Annie Farmer statements,' it is no longer necessary to call AUSA Rossmiller as a witness.
Unspecified statements
Exchanges between AUSA Rossmiller and Mr. Glassman are argued to be not privileged.
Jane's story about The Lion King
AUSA Rossmiller exchanged emails with Mr. Glassman, inviting Jane to change her story from seeing the play to seeing the movie.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity