DOJ-OGR-00017319.jpg
594 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
594 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell and the Judge discuss a jury note regarding transportation and accountability for a return flight from New Mexico. The debate centers on whether Maxwell can be convicted based on arranging a return flight from an area where a victim, 'Jane,' claims sexual abuse occurred, as opposed to the initial flight to New Mexico which had alleged illegal intent.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing regarding the interpretation of a jury note concerning transportation and intent.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion, expressing confusion over the jury's note.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Discussed in the context of whether she can be held accountable for arranging a return flight.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Associate |
Mentioned as a person the return flight might be moving away from.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Referenced regarding claims of sexual abuse and intent to engage in sexual activity.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00017319.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of a specific flight and alleged illegal sexual activity.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction implied by court reporter name.
|
Relationships (2)
Discussion of whether Maxwell arranged flights where Jane claims she was involved in sexual abuse.
Mention of flight going 'somewhere away from Mr. Epstein'.
Key Quotes (4)
"THE COURT: Well, I find it confusing. For example, I don't know if this is a question about aiding and abetting."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017319.jpg
Quote #1
"MR. EVERDELL: I think this is a question about whether you can hold her accountable for a return flight, if you believe that she had something to do with arranging that return flight from New Mexico"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017319.jpg
Quote #2
"MR. EVERDELL: ...whereas the first flight to New Mexico may have been -- at least there's some testimony to consider about whether that was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017319.jpg
Quote #3
"MR. EVERDELL: ...somewhere away from Mr. Epstein."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017319.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,518 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 29 3132
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
1 entire note seems to be about transportation of some kind. And
2 so we would propose just referring them to the instruction in
3 its entirety.
4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I don't find this note
5 confusing. And I think simply saying it's confusing --
6 THE COURT: Well, I find it confusing. For example, I
7 don't know if this is a question about aiding and abetting. I
8 don't know.
9 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think this is pretty -- I
10 think this is a question about whether you can hold her
11 accountable for a return flight, if you believe that she had
12 something to do with arranging that return flight from New
13 Mexico; whereas the first flight to New Mexico may have been --
14 at least there's some testimony to consider about whether that
15 was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity. It was not
16 true of the return flight, the flight back, wherever she was
17 going, home, somewhere else, somewhere away from Mr. Epstein.
18 I think they are asking, Can we consider if Ms.
19 Maxwell had anything to do with that flight, arranging of that
20 flight, whether she can be convicted, because it's on the
21 return trip from an area where Jane claims she was involved in
22 sexual abuse.
23 THE COURT: But it says where/if the intent was to
24 engage -- for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
25 MR. EVERDELL: Right. They are saying with a flight
2 so we would propose just referring them to the instruction in
3 its entirety.
4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I don't find this note
5 confusing. And I think simply saying it's confusing --
6 THE COURT: Well, I find it confusing. For example, I
7 don't know if this is a question about aiding and abetting. I
8 don't know.
9 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think this is pretty -- I
10 think this is a question about whether you can hold her
11 accountable for a return flight, if you believe that she had
12 something to do with arranging that return flight from New
13 Mexico; whereas the first flight to New Mexico may have been --
14 at least there's some testimony to consider about whether that
15 was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity. It was not
16 true of the return flight, the flight back, wherever she was
17 going, home, somewhere else, somewhere away from Mr. Epstein.
18 I think they are asking, Can we consider if Ms.
19 Maxwell had anything to do with that flight, arranging of that
20 flight, whether she can be convicted, because it's on the
21 return trip from an area where Jane claims she was involved in
22 sexual abuse.
23 THE COURT: But it says where/if the intent was to
24 engage -- for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
25 MR. EVERDELL: Right. They are saying with a flight
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017319
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document