Event Details
Past
Description
Return flight from New Mexico
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| JANE | person | 1277 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00014701.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between defense attorney Mr. Everdell and the Court regarding a jury note. The debate centers on whether Ghislaine Maxwell can be held criminally liable for arranging a return flight from New Mexico for a victim named 'Jane,' distinguishing the intent of the return flight from the initial flight to the location where sexual abuse allegedly occurred.
DOJ-OGR-00017319.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell and the Judge discuss a jury note regarding transportation and accountability for a return flight from New Mexico. The debate centers on whether Maxwell can be convicted based on arranging a return flight from an area where a victim, 'Jane,' claims sexual abuse occurred, as opposed to the initial flight to New Mexico which had alleged illegal intent.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
A meeting involving the witness (Jane) and Epstein.
1994-01-01 • Unknown
Filing of the court transcript regarding sentencing calculations.
2022-08-22 • Court (Southern District)
Trip to New York to see The Lion King
Date unknown • New York
A trip to New Mexico involving Jane.
Date unknown • New Mexico
Jane's trip to Epstein's ranch in New Mexico, which she testified occurred when she was '15 or 16'.
Date unknown • Epstein's ranch in New Mexico
A trip taken by Jane to New Mexico, allegedly for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity.
Date unknown • New Mexico
A return trip taken by Jane from New Mexico, during which Mr. Epstein was not present.
Date unknown • New Mexico
A trial where the Government presented evidence, including Jane's testimony, and the jury was instructed by the District Court.
Date unknown • District Court
A trial where the Defendant is arguing she suffered prejudice due to a delay in prosecution.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event