This document is page 34 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that a male subject (likely a juror) gave inconsistent statements regarding his understanding of the publicity consequences of an interview with a journalist named Lucia, specifically in relation to answers provided on a jury questionnaire. Everdell highlights the contradiction of the subject claiming he did not expect to become known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse while simultaneously speaking to journalists.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Speaking to the court regarding inconsistencies in a subject's testimony about media interactions.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney/Prosecutor |
Speaking briefly at the beginning of the page.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing.
|
| Lucia | Journalist |
Mentioned as having interviewed the male subject ('he') regarding his going public.
|
| He / Him | Subject/Juror/Witness |
Unnamed male discussing his jury questionnaire answers and interview with journalist Lucia regarding being a sexual a...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
"I didn't understand that this was an issue in the questionnaire."Source
"he didn't expect to be public, he didn't expect to be known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse, he didn't expect this come out, even though he's talking to journalists."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,562 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document