DOJ-OGR-00010249.jpg

611 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 611 KB
Summary

This document is page 34 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that a male subject (likely a juror) gave inconsistent statements regarding his understanding of the publicity consequences of an interview with a journalist named Lucia, specifically in relation to answers provided on a jury questionnaire. Everdell highlights the contradiction of the subject claiming he did not expect to become known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse while simultaneously speaking to journalists.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Mr. Everdell Defense Attorney
Speaking to the court regarding inconsistencies in a subject's testimony about media interactions.
Ms. Moe Attorney/Prosecutor
Speaking briefly at the beginning of the page.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing.
Lucia Journalist
Mentioned as having interviewed the male subject ('he') regarding his going public.
He / Him Subject/Juror/Witness
Unnamed male discussing his jury questionnaire answers and interview with journalist Lucia regarding being a sexual a...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR

Timeline (1 events)

2022-03-11
Court hearing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell case)
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.

Relationships (1)

Unnamed Male Subject Interviewee/Journalist Lucia
Mr. Everdell mentions 'his interview with the journalist Lucia'.

Key Quotes (2)

"I didn't understand that this was an issue in the questionnaire."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010249.jpg
Quote #1
"he didn't expect to be public, he didn't expect to be known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse, he didn't expect this come out, even though he's talking to journalists."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010249.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,562 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 34 of 50 34
M38TMAX1
1 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
2 THE COURT: And then I will --
3 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I believe he mentioned
4 something about his interview with the journalist Lucia, first
5 name Lucia, and I was trying to follow his response, but he
6 said something about: I didn't understand that this was an
7 issue in the questionnaire. But I believe the reporting is
8 that they discussed this at length, the consequences of him
9 going public and the consequences of the fact that there was a
10 jury questionnaire at issue here and there were answers to
11 those questions that he would be talking about. I can't
12 remember exactly what it is, but there was some discussion
13 about the consequences of him going forward. And I believe
14 what he said was: I didn't have any discussions or any lengthy
15 discussions with the journalists about me coming forward and
16 just answered their questions. But I believe there was a
17 discussion with Lucia about the consequences, about whether he
18 wants to do this, about -- I don't remember now --
19 THE COURT: I don't understand what you're referring
20 to.
21 MR. EVERDELL: I think the issue is he was saying how
22 he didn't expect to be public, he didn't expect to be known
23 worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse, he didn't expect this
24 come out, even though he's talking to journalists. My
25 understanding is he had a discussion with Lucia, the journalist
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010249

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document