DOJ-OGR-00002336(1).jpg

558 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal correspondence
File Size: 558 KB
Summary

This is page 2 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 28, 2021. The US Attorney's office is addressing Judge Nathan regarding proposed redactions to the defendant's motions (Motions 3, 10, and 11) to protect victim-witness privacy and the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The government agrees to most redactions but intends to submit limited additional redactions for Motion 3 via email under seal.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Addressee of the letter (Honorable)
Audrey Strauss United States Attorney
Signatory authority for the government
Maurene Comey Assistant United States Attorney
Signatory
Alison Moe Assistant United States Attorney
Signatory
Lara Pomerantz Assistant United States Attorney
Signatory
Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorney
Signatory
The Defendant Defendant
Referred to regarding motions for bill of particulars (Motion 10), suppression (Motion 11), and Due Process (Motion 3...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
Department of Justice
Implied by footer DOJ-OGR

Timeline (1 events)

January 28, 2021
Filing of Document 128 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Southern District of New York
US Attorneys Judge Nathan

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the US Attorneys

Relationships (2)

Audrey Strauss Colleagues Maurene Comey
Both listed as attorneys for the United States in the signature block
Alison Moe Colleagues Lara Pomerantz
Both listed as Assistant United States Attorneys

Key Quotes (3)

"The proposed redactions to the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars and pretrial disclosures (Motion 10) protect the privacy interests of victim-witnesses"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002336(1).jpg
Quote #1
"protect the integrity of the Government’s ongoing investigation"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002336(1).jpg
Quote #2
"The Government respectfully submits that a limited number of additional redactions would be appropriate with respect to Motion 3"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002336(1).jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,542 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 128 Filed 01/28/21 Page 2 of 2
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
January 28, 2021
Page 2
meaning of the Protective Order in this case, and relate to third-party privacy interests or materials that remain sealed in the civil proceeding.
• The proposed redactions to the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars and pretrial disclosures (Motion 10) protect the privacy interests of victim-witnesses and protect the integrity of the Government’s ongoing investigation.
• The proposed redactions to the defendant’s motion to suppress under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments (Motion 11) are narrowly tailored to protect the integrity of the Government’s ongoing investigation.
In addition, the Government has no objection to the defendant’s proposed redactions to her motion to suppress under the Due Process Clause (Motion 3) as the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the Government’s ongoing investigation. The Government respectfully submits that a limited number of additional redactions would be appropriate with respect to Motion 3 in order to be consistent with the other redactions proposed by the defendant in that particular motion. The Government will submit those additional proposed redactions under seal by email.
Respectfully submitted,
AUDREY STRAUSS
United States Attorney
By: s/
Maurene Comey / Alison Moe /
Lara Pomerantz / Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Tel: (212) 637-2324
Cc: All counsel of record, by email
DOJ-OGR-00002336

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document