Amos Tversky
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Daniel Kahneman
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Daniel Kahneman
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016973.jpg
This document page, marked as House Oversight evidence, appears to be an excerpt from a philosophical or scientific essay discussing the ethics of artificial intelligence, human rights, and cognitive science. It references various thought experiments (Chinese Room, Milgram) and figures (Scott Adams, Isaac Asimov, Daniel Kahneman) to explore the legal and moral distinctions between humans, hybrids, and machines. The text argues that future machines may obtain rights similar to corporations and discusses the inconsistencies in how society handles privacy and cognitive differences.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016897.jpg
This document discusses the trade-off between accuracy and generalizability in modeling human cognition. It contrasts rational theories, which are generalizable but often inaccurate, with heuristics proposed by Kahneman and Tversky, which are accurate to human behavior but hard to generalize. The text argues for a new approach that incorporates the limitations of computational resources into rational models to better describe real-world human decision-making.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016390.jpg
This document is page 170 of a House Oversight exhibit (likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's scientific interests or funding). It contains a philosophical essay discussing the evolution of rights for humans, hybrids, and machines (AI), referencing cognitive science experiments, Isaac Asimov's laws of robotics, and the potential for machines to gain corporate-like rights. The text explores the ethical implications of facial recognition, artificial consciousness, and the unequal application of rights across biological and artificial entities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity