Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Daniel Kahneman

Person
Mentions
10
Relationships
2
Events
0
Documents
4
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Amos Tversky
Business associate
6
1
View
person Amos Tversky
Professional academic
5
1
View
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016973.jpg

This document page, marked as House Oversight evidence, appears to be an excerpt from a philosophical or scientific essay discussing the ethics of artificial intelligence, human rights, and cognitive science. It references various thought experiments (Chinese Room, Milgram) and figures (Scott Adams, Isaac Asimov, Daniel Kahneman) to explore the legal and moral distinctions between humans, hybrids, and machines. The text argues that future machines may obtain rights similar to corporations and discusses the inconsistencies in how society handles privacy and cognitive differences.

Legal discovery document / scientific essay page
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016897.jpg

This document discusses the trade-off between accuracy and generalizability in modeling human cognition. It contrasts rational theories, which are generalizable but often inaccurate, with heuristics proposed by Kahneman and Tversky, which are accurate to human behavior but hard to generalize. The text argues for a new approach that incorporates the limitations of computational resources into rational models to better describe real-world human decision-making.

Academic text / report page
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016894.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a book or article included in House Oversight files (Bates stamped 016894). It outlines the views of cognitive scientist Tom Griffiths regarding Artificial Intelligence, 'value alignment,' and 'bounded optimality,' contrasting machine learning with human cognition and referencing psychologist Daniel Kahneman. The text argues that understanding human learning is essential for advancing AI.

Article excerpt / book page (likely from an edge.org publication or similar intellectual collection)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016390.jpg

This document is page 170 of a House Oversight exhibit (likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's scientific interests or funding). It contains a philosophical essay discussing the evolution of rights for humans, hybrids, and machines (AI), referencing cognitive science experiments, Isaac Asimov's laws of robotics, and the potential for machines to gain corporate-like rights. The text explores the ethical implications of facial recognition, artificial consciousness, and the unequal application of rights across biological and artificial entities.

Essay / academic paper (house oversight exhibit)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search