This document appears to be a fragment of a message or email containing a list of four women, with names redacted, accompanied by brief descriptions of their ages, physical appearance, and personality traits (e.g., 'wild', 'sexy'). The sender asks the recipient if they wish to have 'apts' (appointments) set up with these women, mentioning specific details like one working for Elle magazine and another willing to come to a hotel room.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or article (likely by Paul Krassner) stamped with a House Oversight footer. It details the narrator's interactions with comedian Lenny Bruce, including a financial gift of $500 and the publication of a hoax obituary in *The Realist*. It also discusses the aftermath of the JFK assassination, specifically focusing on Jack Ruby, his alleged tattoo, and the legal dismissal of his murder charges.
The author responds to a series of complaints and allegations regarding their conduct, specifically denying harassment claims and providing context for interactions with students and colleagues. The document details defenses against specific items (1 through 6), explains professional relationships at Case Western and ASU, and asserts that the author's integrity is validated by their continued employment and invitations to speak at organizations like CFI.
An email chain from December 11, 2017, between journalist Peter Aldhous and physicist Lawrence Krauss. Aldhous presses Krauss on why multiple women have accused him of sexual misconduct over a decade and seeks clarification on a specific 2006 hotel room encounter. Krauss denies the allegations, stating he treats people with respect and does not sexually harass anyone, while noting he is traveling and will provide a fuller response later.
This document is a scanned page (page 140) from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich', included in House Oversight documents. It details a 1997 police report filed by a model named Alicia regarding a sexual encounter with Jeffrey Epstein at 'Shutters on the Beach' hotel. The text describes Epstein's appearance, his method of luring the victim under the guise of a Victoria's Secret modeling job, and his specific actions during the assault.
This document appears to be a draft manuscript or legal analysis (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and context of these document dumps) critiquing the legal strategy employed by President Clinton's lawyer, Robert Bennett, during the Paula Jones case. The author argues that Clinton should have 'defaulted' the civil case rather than litigating or attempting to settle, which would have avoided depositions and potentially the fallout involving Monica Lewinsky. It details a specific rejected settlement offer of $700,000 and discusses the concept of defaulting in civil litigation.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (indicated by word count and date headers) written by an attorney, likely Alan Dershowitz, given the specific anecdotes and clients mentioned. The text analyzes the 'irrational' risky behavior of celebrity clients, specifically citing Leona Helmsley's tax evasion and Mike Tyson's rape conviction as examples where the risks outweighed the benefits. The author concludes with a psychological analysis of celebrity entitlement and a personal anecdote about reusing tea bags.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or investigative report (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of House Oversight documents related to the Epstein investigation often including his other cases) defending Mike Tyson against rape charges. The text argues that the accuser, Desiree Washington, fabricated the rape allegation to avoid her father's wrath, citing a history of domestic issues. It details the lack of physical evidence (bruises, sequins) and inconsistencies in Washington's story compared to the physical reality of the encounter.
This document appears to be a page from a legal argument or investigative report (labeled with House Oversight footer) defending Mike Tyson against rape charges filed by Desiree Washington. The text argues the encounter was consensual, citing Washington's behavior (not locking the bathroom door, getting on top), and characterizes her as a 'groupie' motivated by money, comparing her intentions to Robin Givens. It also alleges Washington had a history of making false accusations to appease her strict father.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the legal philosophy surrounding rape prosecutions, the trade-off between convicting the guilty and protecting the innocent, and the author's shift toward defending accused rapists. The text specifically details the author's involvement as the appellate lawyer for Mike Tyson following his conviction for raping Desiree Washington in Indianapolis.
A digitized page from Ehud Barak's memoir (marked with House Oversight identifiers) detailing his political campaign strategy against Benjamin Netanyahu. The text describes Barak seeking advice from high-profile political consultants including Stanley Greenberg, Bob Shrum, and James Carville. It details a specific meeting in a New York hotel room (text erroneously dates this 'Feburary 1988', context dictates 1998) where Carville critiques Barak's passive approach and lack of a stump speech.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or biography describing the life of 'Lenny' (likely comedian Lenny Bruce). It details his financial struggles, inability to get bookings, and frequent arrests. It specifically recounts a Christmas where the narrator gave him $500, and a disturbing incident in October 1963 where police officers entered his home without a warrant and brandished a gun.
This document appears to be a page from a transcript or screenplay bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp (015169). It depicts a dialogue between Sarah Palin and John McCain during the 2008 election season, discussing geopolitical strategies involving Pakistan and Iran, and rumors of Joe Biden being replaced by Hillary Clinton. The conversation escalates into mutual blackmail, with Palin threatening to release a tape of an alleged one-night stand at a governors' conference, and McCain countering with a threat to release a recording of their current conversation.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or book (likely by Paul Krassner) included in House Oversight files. It recounts anecdotes about comedian Lenny Bruce, including a financial gift of $500 and the publication of a hoax obituary in *The Realist* magazine. The text also discusses Jack Ruby, his alleged tattoo, and the legal aftermath of the JFK assassination involving District Attorney Henry Wade.
This document appears to be a printed email newsletter containing a news summary regarding the 2012 Secret Service prostitution scandal in Colombia. The text highlights new allegations that senior White House aides were informed that a presidential advance-team member hosted a prostitute overnight, contradicting previous denials of White House involvement. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029219.
This document is an email from Lawrence Krauss dated December 10, 2017, containing a 'First draft' response to a series of sexual harassment allegations posed by a reporter. Krauss denies the allegations, specifically addressing incidents involving a consensual encounter in 2006, interaction with a student interested in science communication, and an incident where his wife was misidentified as a 'female companion.' The document appears to be part of a House Oversight investigation file.
This document is a detailed written rebuttal by a male academic (likely Lawrence Krauss based on biographical details like the move from Case to ASU to ANU) responding to specific allegations of misconduct numbered 1 through 6. The author denies the allegations, clarifying that a 'female companion' was his wife, describing a student relationship as professional mentorship, and citing university investigations (ASU and ANU) that cleared him of wrongdoing regarding a 2016 'selfie' incident. The text highlights the author's frustration with anonymous third-party complaints and alleged violations of confidentiality agreements regarding past HR matters.
This document outlines specific allegations of sexual harassment and inappropriate conduct against Dr. Lawrence Krauss (referred to as 'you') occurring between 2007 and 2008 while he was at Case Western Reserve University and attending conferences. It details incidents involving unwanted sexual advances, inappropriate comments to students, and an official university investigation that concluded his behavior could constitute sexual harassment. The text also notes his subsequent move to Arizona State University and interactions with Richard Dawkins.
This document contains an email draft from physicist Lawrence Krauss dated December 10, 2017, responding to a reporter's inquiries regarding allegations of sexual harassment. Krauss denies the allegations, specifically addressing incidents involving selfies, a 2006 hotel room encounter, and claims made at conferences (CFI), while defending his professional conduct at ASU and other institutions. The document appears to be part of a larger production of files, indicated by the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer.
This document outlines a series of sexual harassment allegations and incidents involving Dr. Lawrence Krauss (referred to as 'you'). It details a formal investigation at Case Western Reserve University in 2008 that resulted in restrictions on his access to campus, followed by subsequent allegations of inappropriate behavior at atheist conventions and on a CFI cruise between 2008 and 2011. The document appears to be an investigative summary produced by the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a draft email written by Lawrence Krauss on December 10, 2017, responding to a reporter or investigator regarding multiple allegations of sexual harassment. Krauss categorically denies the allegations, offering specific rebuttals to numbered 'items,' including a 2006 hotel encounter he claims was consensual and stopped politely, and a complaint by a former student at Case Western Reserve University which he claims was resolved informally with no finding of harassment. He argues that his high profile invites scrutiny but asserts his behavior has always been professional.
This page from a House Oversight report details the initial meetings between Edward Snowden and journalists (Greenwald, Poitras, MacAskill) in a hotel room on June 4th. It describes Snowden's security rituals (the 'magical cloak'), transcriptions of his introduction to Ewen MacAskill, and critically analyzes discrepancies between Snowden's claims about his career/salary ($200k vs $133k) and the official records from the CIA, DIA, and Booz Allen. The report attempts to discredit Snowden's truthfulness regarding his authority to intercept presidential communications.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity