HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021418.jpg

2.82 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
7
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email correspondence / draft statement
File Size: 2.82 MB
Summary

This document contains an email draft from physicist Lawrence Krauss dated December 10, 2017, responding to a reporter's inquiries regarding allegations of sexual harassment. Krauss denies the allegations, specifically addressing incidents involving selfies, a 2006 hotel room encounter, and claims made at conferences (CFI), while defending his professional conduct at ASU and other institutions. The document appears to be part of a larger production of files, indicated by the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Lawrence M. Krauss Sender / Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Author of the email, defending himself against harassment allegations.
Conference Attendee (Unnamed) Alleged Victim / Witness
Person allegedly touched in an unwelcome manner; person who took a selfie.
Reporter (Unnamed) Recipient (implied)
Person investigating Krauss, referred to as 'your reporting'.
Krauss's Wife Witness
Referenced as the 'female companion' in 'incident 5'.

Organizations (7)

Name Type Context
Arizona State University (ASU)
Employer of Lawrence Krauss.
Australian National University (ANU)
Institution involved in an investigation regarding a photo.
The Origins Project
Krauss's initiative at ASU.
CFI (Center for Inquiry)
Organization where Krauss was an honorary director and speaker.
Case (Case Western Reserve University)
Former employer/institution mentioned by Krauss.
Cosmology Initiative
Organization Krauss co-directed.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document (via footer stamp).

Timeline (3 events)

2006
Consensual encounter in a hotel room.
Hotel Room
Lawrence Krauss Unnamed Woman
2017
CFI conference where a reporter watched Krauss sign books.
Las Vegas
Lawrence Krauss Reporter
November 2016
Incident involving a selfie and alleged unwelcome touch at a conference.
Unknown (Conference)
Lawrence Krauss Conference Attendee

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location of a CFI conference.
Address for Arizona State University.
Location of a 'consensual encounter' in 2006.

Relationships (2)

Lawrence Krauss Employment Arizona State University
Signature block lists him as Director and Foundation Professor at ASU.
Lawrence Krauss Professional/Honorary CFI
Asked to be honorary director, invited speaker.

Key Quotes (6)

"What makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies... I am particularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021418.jpg
Quote #1
"This false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021418.jpg
Quote #2
"I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021418.jpg
Quote #3
"I do not sexually harass people."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021418.jpg
Quote #4
"Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate..."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021418.jpg
Quote #5
"The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false..."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021418.jpg
Quote #6

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (5,229 characters)

- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in an unwelcome manner.
- The conference attendee who took the 'selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016).
- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016).
The photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.
- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took the 'selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested in the course of the investigation."
(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies not to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)
What makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am particularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the interactions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff of all genders and ethnicities. I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally.
Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Research Office [REDACTED], Assistant [REDACTED]
Origins Office [REDACTED]
origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/lkrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu
On Dec 10, 2017, at 9:53 PM, Lawrence Krauss [REDACTED] wrote:
First draft:
It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part.
Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions.
Your specific allegations are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and had respectful encounters afterwards. I cannot comment on item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim, because I know nothing about it, and it was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part is false. I don't do that. Re incident 5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.
It is worthwhile responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021418

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document