| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sharon Churcher
|
Collaborated on story |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Collaborated on story |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-09-16 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding the wording of the NPA and presentation to the judge. | N/A | View |
This document is an email chain from July 8, 2008, regarding the 'Epstein CVRA Case' (Crime Victims' Rights Act). Officials at the EOUSA (Executive Office for United States Attorneys) are coordinating a response to an emergency petition filed the previous day. They are discussing a draft declaration by an AUSA (likely Villafana, based on attachment names) and requesting copies of letters sent to victims that serve as evidence in the affidavit.
This document is an email read receipt dated December 19, 2008. The subject line indicates the original email contained a file named 'Villafana Supplemental Declaration.wpd' regarding Epstein. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
This document is page 43 of an index or cross-reference list, likely from a legal document, containing various words and names with corresponding page and line numbers. It includes references to individuals like Villafana, Waitt, Weinstein, Werner, and Wexner, and features a redaction labeled 'DOJ REDACTION'.
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, likely a deposition, focusing on the origins and discovery of an 'Epstein list'. Ghislaine Maxwell is being questioned about her awareness of the list and the timeline of events, including Brad Edwards' involvement, Alfredo Rodriguez providing evidence, and Ted Waitt being asked for $10 million to keep Maxwell out of Epstein's civil suits in 2009. The document also touches upon Epstein's non-prosecution agreement in 2007-2008 and the subsequent prosecution of Rothstein and Alfredo Rodriguez.
This document is an index or keyword list, likely from a larger report, containing various words and names with corresponding page and line references. It includes a DOJ redaction and mentions several individuals such as Villafana, Waitt, Weinstein, Werner, and Wexner, along with terms like 'viewed', 'visited', 'wanted', 'wedding', and 'weekend'.
This document details events related to the Epstein case, including a $10 million request to Ted Waitt to keep someone out of civil suits and the signing of a non-prosecution agreement by Epstein in 2007. It also mentions Villafana as the lead prosecutor and Brad Edwards filing the CVRA case.
This legal document page describes the extensive, eight-month negotiation of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) starting in January 2007, contrasting it with a potential plea agreement that was also drafted. It emphasizes the deep involvement of multiple levels of the U.S. government, including the Department of Justice, the USAO for the Southern District of Florida, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, and the FBI, in the negotiation and approval process.
This document is a page from a legal brief filed on February 28, 2023. It argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was intended to have a broad scope, providing global immunity to Epstein and his co-conspirators beyond a specific district. It cites a 2007 email from prosecutor Villafana to defense attorney Lefkowitz, explicitly stating a preference not to highlight other crimes and other chargeable persons to the judge.
This document is a Subpoena to Testify Before Grand Jury issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on October 6, 2006. It commands a redacted recipient to produce documents or objects (the specific list is redacted) at the federal courthouse in West Palm Beach on October 20, 2006. The subpoena relates to case/grand jury number FGJ 05-02(WPB) and requires coordination with a redacted FBI Special Agent.
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The firm argues that a previous review of the Epstein case by the DOJ/CEOS was insufficient and requests a true 'de novo' review, citing recent Supreme Court decisions (*Santos* and *Cuellar*) that weaken the federal case. The letter complains that AUSA Villafana has violated the Non-Prosecution Agreement by re-initiating a grand jury investigation and subpoenaing a [redacted] individual to provide testimony and documents (photos, emails, phone records) on July 1, 2008.
This document is a letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, Esq., dated June 19, 2008, arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The firm requests a 'de novo' independent review, citing the existence of a Non-Prosecution Agreement and a State plea deal, while accusing AUSA Villafana of misconduct for re-initiating a grand jury investigation and subpoenaing a redacted individual for documents including photos and emails.
I will mention ‘co-conspirators,’ but I would prefer not to highlight for the judge all of the other crimes and all of the other persons that we could charge
An email from Villafana to Lefkowitz attaching a draft information and plea agreement concerning Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity