33401
LocationRelationship Network
081.pdf
Legal filing from July 2, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Plaintiff's counsel Isidro Garcia responds to a court order, apologizing for delays in filing a scheduling report, partly attributing the delay to difficulty serving Sarah Kellen who was 'believed to have been avoiding service.' The document announces that a settlement has been reached resolving all claims in this federal case and a companion state court case.
047.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law filed on July 14, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The Plaintiff opposes Sarah Kellen's motion to set aside a default judgment, arguing that Kellen was properly served via 'nail and mail' in New York on April 23, 2009, after six attempts, and deliberately ignored the lawsuit. The filing asserts Kellen has provided no evidence she didn't receive service and has failed to present a meritorious defense as required by law.
042.pdf
This document is a Motion to Set Aside Order of Default filed by attorney Bruce E. Reinhart on behalf of defendant Sarah Kellen in the case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Sarah Kellen. Kellen argues that the default judgment entered on June 17, 2009, is invalid because the plaintiff failed to properly serve the summons under New York law (specifically regarding timing of filing the affidavit of service) and because the time for a responsive pleading had not yet expired when the default was entered.
EFTA00019162.pdf
An April 2011 email from an FBI Special Agent in the West Palm Beach office to a conference coordinator at Jefferson Companies. The agent is investigating whether Jeffrey Epstein and a second redacted individual attended the 'New Orleans Investment Conference' in New Orleans between 1998 and 2000, and is also seeking information on which hotels were used.
DOJ-OGR-00023235.tif
This document is a letter from the FBI's West Palm Beach office dated August 28, 2006, informing a recipient named 'Пенг' that they have been identified as a possible victim of a federal crime. The letter outlines the FBI's Victim Assistance Program, explains the criminal justice process, details the recipient's rights under federal law (18 U.S. Code § 3771), and provides instructions for using the Victim Notification System (VNS) to stay updated on the ongoing investigation. Redactions are present for the case number, recipient's full name, and specific identification numbers (VIN and PIN).
DOJ-OGR-00030577.jpg
This document is page 110 of a 131-page index for a legal transcript, created by J. Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords and numbers (from 'thought' to '9') mentioned in the transcript, along with the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear. The document is marked with Public Records Request No. 17-295 and DOJ control number DOJ-OGR-00030577.
DOJ-OGR-00033070.jpg
This document is page 82 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. A witness is being questioned about their knowledge of specific individuals, including Nick Kowalski and Patrick Thomas. The questioning touches on the witness's past behavior, including an incident where they were reported missing by their father, and allegations regarding Thomas possessing an illegal firearm. The document bears a 2017 date stamp and a DOJ production number.
DOJ-OGR-00033065.jpg
This page is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned about family members (mother, sister, and mother's husband Paul) living in Georgia. The questioning shifts to whether the witness discussed 'Epstein's case' with Paul, and specifically if they discussed 'what happened in Mr. Epstein's house' with an individual named Brett Albritton, to which the witness confirms Brett knows the basics.
DOJ-OGR-00033040.jpg
This document is page 52 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about whether they received a victim notification letter (confirmed) and if they provided physical evidence to law enforcement. The witness denies providing physical evidence initially, but then clarifies they gave their cell phone to a woman named Michelle Pagan approximately three or four years prior to the deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00033028.jpg
This document is page 40 of a deposition transcript (stamped DOJ-OGR-00033028) involving the cross-examination of a witness by Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on sexual acts (masturbation) and whether the witness previously lied to the police. The witness admits that while she told police Epstein did not touch her, that statement was not 'fully truthful,' and she confirms in this testimony that Epstein did, in fact, touch her.
DOJ-OGR-00033014.jpg
This document is page 26 of a deposition transcript involving a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The witness is questioned about whether anyone persuaded them to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money before arriving at his house, which the witness denies. The document features a significant procedural argument where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'coaching the witness' during the testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity