Legal filing from July 2, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Plaintiff's counsel Isidro Garcia responds to a court order, apologizing for delays in filing a scheduling report, partly attributing the delay to difficulty serving Sarah Kellen who was 'believed to have been avoiding service.' The document announces that a settlement has been reached resolving all claims in this federal case and a companion state court case.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe II | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in civil suit against Epstein and Kellen
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in civil suit
|
| Sarah Kellen | Defendant |
Defendant in civil suit; noted as believed to be avoiding service
|
| Isidro M. Garcia | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe II
|
| Robert D. Critton | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Epstein
|
| Michael Pike | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Epstein
|
| Bruce Reinhart | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where case is filed
|
|
| Garcia Law Firm, P.A. |
Law firm representing Plaintiff
|
|
| Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman |
Law firm representing Defendant Epstein
|
|
| Bruce Reinhart, P.A. |
Law firm representing Defendant Kellen
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address for Garcia Law Firm
|
|
|
Address for Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman
|
|
|
Address for Bruce Reinhart, P.A.
|
"There was some delay in effecting service on Defendant SARAH KELLEN, who is believed to have been avoiding service"Source
"The parties have been involved in settlement discussions for some time, and reached a resolution of the claims in this and the State court companion case this week, and all claims have been resolved."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,119 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document