Federal government
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
State and local authorities
|
Jurisdictional division |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
United States attorney
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
private sector employee
|
Comparison |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Governments
|
Fiscal funding |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Federal lawsuit filed against the government by victims | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit against Federal Government | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of non-prosecution agreement finalized, including protection for four of Mr. Epstein'... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Entry into Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Indictment and charges | Mr. Epstein was indicted for solicitation, and the state of Florida was urged to bring a second c... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A 'global solution' agreement was reached involving a plea in state court for soliciting an under... | state court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the federal government for se... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of Jeffrey Epstein's secret non-prosecution deal with the federal government. | Florida | View |
| 2018-12-22 | Government shutdown | The federal government was closed from December 22, 2018, to January 25, 2019. | N/A | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Federal government conceded it gave Epstein 'valuable consideration' for information. | Unknown | View |
| 2011-06-01 | N/A | Expected expiration of Federal Support for Medicaid | USA | View |
| 2010-10-01 | N/A | Start of Fiscal Year 2011 example | USA | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | ARRA (economic stimulus) provided ~$100 billion in support for states | USA | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Two victims sued the federal government under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac taken into federal conservatorship | USA | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Final Plea Bargain / Sentencing | Federal/State Court | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Mr. Epstein's legal team negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with the federal government. | N/A | View |
| 1970-01-01 | N/A | Enactment of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). | United States | View |
| 1942-01-01 | N/A | Farmers planted 36,000 acres of hemp to aid the war effort. | USA | View |
| 0001-10-01 | N/A | Scheduled launch of the health insurance exchange systems. | USA | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013353.jpg
This legal document page details allegations of witness tampering and harassment by Jeffrey Epstein against a victim identified as Jane Doe. It describes a specific incident on July 1, 2010, where a private investigator hired by Epstein stalked Jane Doe and flashed lights into her home, forcing her to flee to a secure location with a retired police officer. The text also references multiple exhibits regarding indictments and no-contact orders.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013335.jpg
This legal document (page 17) details the timeline surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It describes attorney 'Edwards' filing a motion to reopen a CVRA action and notes that a victim ('Jane Doe') appeared on television to criticize the lenient plea. The document confirms that on June 30, 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to state solicitation charges in Palm Beach County and entered a federal non-prosecution agreement that acknowledged potential compensation for approximately 34 victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013332.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing detailing attorney Bradley J. Edwards' representation of Epstein victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe starting in April 2008. It highlights the victims' concerns that the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office were secretly arranging a plea deal with Epstein without notifying the victims, despite previous assurances in January 2008 that the investigation was ongoing and they would be consulted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024724.jpg
This page from an Ackrell Capital investment report outlines three potential regulatory scenarios for the future of cannabis in the United States. It details hypothetical frameworks for the FDA routine approval of CBD and THC drugs, as well as a broader scenario where the federal government fully legalizes cannabis and establishes a new regulatory agency.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024697.jpg
This document is a page from a 2017 report by Ackrell Capital, LLC regarding the U.S. legal landscape for the cannabis industry. It discusses the conflict between federal prohibition and state legalization, noting that while federal policy restricts cannabis, 46 states permitted some use at the time. The document predicts a shift toward federal approval and legalization. It bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024697', indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, though the text itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024639.jpg
This document is page 3 of a market report by Ackrell Capital regarding the U.S. state-legal cannabis market. It summarizes the conflict between federal prohibition and state legalization, categorizing state laws into medical, CBD/limited, and recreational use as of January 2018. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the U.S. House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024634.jpg
This document is a slide from a 2017 market research presentation by Ackrell Capital, LLC regarding the U.S. Legalized Cannabis Market. It features a chart projecting market growth and consumer numbers through 2030, contingent on federal legalization milestones, and a diagram categorized by industry segments (Production, Business Solutions, Distribution, Digital Media, and Consumer Products). The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024634, indicating it is part of a larger evidence collection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024523.jpg
This page appears to be part of a corporate filing or due diligence report for KLC OpCo (Knowledge Learning Corporation), detailing the regulatory environment for its child care centers. It covers compliance with state licensing, the No Child Left Behind Act, the ADA, and the Internal Revenue Code. While Jeffrey Epstein is not named on this specific page, KLC was an Apollo Global Management investment, and this document is part of the House Oversight Committee's investigation (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024523), likely regarding Epstein's tax advice or financial relationship with Apollo/Leon Black.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013489.tif
This affidavit, authored by Bradley James Edwards, details his role as lead attorney for 'Jane Doe' in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the federal government, his invocation of the Fifth Amendment in response to allegations, and his attempts to discredit Jane Doe's testimony. The document also mentions the existence of Epstein's co-conspirators who allegedly facilitated his crimes and were deposed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024939.jpg
This document appears to be a transcript of an interview with a high-ranking UAE official (likely the Ruler of Dubai), contained within House Oversight Committee records (Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024939). The interviewee discusses leadership philosophy, personal hobbies (horses), the economic stability of Dubai and the UAE amidst the global financial crisis, and government initiatives to address demographic concerns and national identity. The text emphasizes the unity of the UAE banking system and the strategic nature of Dubai's infrastructure investments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024934.jpg
The document contains an interview transcript where an official discusses the UAE's response to the global financial crisis, specifically addressing the Federal Government's swift actions and the economic relationship between Dubai and Abu Dhabi. The speaker clarifies details regarding a $20 billion bond issuance, the UAE Central Bank's involvement, and refutes rumors about Dubai selling state-owned companies to Abu Dhabi, emphasizing the unity of the Emirates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024801.jpg
This document is page 165 of a report by Ackrell Capital, LLC, dated 2017, detailing 'Chapter IX: Cannabis Industry Risk Factors.' It outlines the legal and financial risks associated with the cannabis industry in relation to U.S. Federal Law, specifically the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), warning of potential asset seizure, imprisonment, and regulatory hurdles regarding interstate commerce. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp, indicating it is part of a larger document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024747.jpg
This document is a page from a 2017 market research report by Ackrell Capital regarding U.S. legalized cannabis market estimates. It includes a bar chart projecting market growth and consumer numbers from 2016 to 2030, contingent on federal legalization milestones. It also provides a sensitivity analysis table showing estimated 2030 market size based on varying population penetration rates and monthly consumer spending. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021874.jpg
This is page 51 of a rough draft legal transcript, likely a deposition. The witness explains the difficulty of finding victims willing to testify about sexual abuse involving a 'very powerful person' linked to an international sex trafficking ring (contextually implied to be Epstein, with specific questions about Alan Dershowitz). The witness mentions collaborating with Mr. Edwards and notes that the Federal Government has also struggled with this investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021027.jpg
The document consists of two slides (pages 371 and 372) from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?'. The content analyzes US technology R&D spending from 1953-2008, noting a shift from federal to private industry funding, and argues for government incentives to encourage private R&D investment for GDP growth. It features a quote from Intel CEO Paul Otellini and references an article by John Chambers and Safra Catz; the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it is part of a larger congressional investigation cache.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021014.jpg
The document consists of two presentation slides (pages 345 and 346) from a report titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?' produced by the venture capital firm KPCB (Kleiner Perkins). The content focuses on strategies for reducing US Federal Government expenses, specifically suggesting the restructuring of entitlement programs (Social Security, Medicare) and improving operating efficiency by reducing federal headcount and reviewing wages and benefits. It cites economic data from 2007-2009 comparing public vs. private sector employment trends.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021011.jpg
This document contains two presentation slides from a report titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?' produced by KPCB. The slides analyze US pension trends between 1980 and 2007, contrasting the decline of guaranteed (defined-benefit) pensions in the private sector against their prevalence in government, and the converse rise of defined-contribution plans in the private sector. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021011.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030255.jpg
An email chain from December 2018 involving Jeffrey Epstein, his lawyers (Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz), and PR advisors (Michael Wolff, Matthew Hiltzik) strategizing a defense against renewed scrutiny of Epstein's 2008 plea deal. Ken Starr drafts a statement arguing the federal government overstepped in a local matter and defending the plea deal as appropriate, characterizing Epstein's crimes merely as 'solicitation of prostitution.' Michael Wolff suggests deflecting blame by highlighting Epstein's connections to Bill Clinton and framing the current scrutiny as a political attack on Trump Labor Secretary Alex Acosta.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.jpg
This document is a December 2018 email chain where author Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on public relations strategy. Wolff responds to a forwarded defense statement written by Ken Starr, who argues Epstein's plea deal was justified and not a 'sweetheart deal'. Wolff suggests leveraging Epstein's connection to former President Clinton and framing the story's resurgence as a political attack on then-Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, the former prosecutor in the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.jpg
This document is a December 15, 2018 email chain revealing a discussion about public relations strategy for Jeffrey Epstein. The chain includes a forwarded message from Ken Starr, who calls Epstein a 'now-friend' and provides a drafted defense of his controversial plea deal, framing it as a state matter with federal overreach. Correspondents Michael Wolff and Matthew Hiltzik discuss strategic messaging, including whether to invoke Epstein's Clinton connection, target Trump official Alex Acosta, and have Epstein admit some wrongdoing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012380.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) memorandum arguing against proposed legislative changes that would expand federal jurisdiction over prostitution, pimping, and adult sex tourism. The DOJ contends that such an expansion is unnecessary, would strain federal resources, and would divert law enforcement from its core anti-trafficking mission, particularly the prosecution of child sex tourism. The document analyzes specific sections of a bill, consistently opposing the federalization of crimes it believes are better handled at the state and local level.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity