United States
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bodmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dreier
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
English
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Boustani
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Torres
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Smith
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Geopolitical rivals |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Sampson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Carrillo-Villa
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Petrov
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dominguez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Hung
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Abdellatif El Mokadem
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Rowe
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alindato-Perez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Crowell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Deutsch
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-02 | N/A | Legal case: United States v. Coccagna, No. 1:22-cr-00407-YK, ECF No. 3-1 | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Legal case: United States v. Chuong, No. 1:21-cr-00164, ECF No. 67 | N/A | View |
| 2022-05-09 | Court decision | A decision was rendered in the case of United States v. Suarez. | 3d Cir. | View |
| 2022-04-22 | Court decision | A decision was rendered in the case of United States v. Santos. | 5th Cir. | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Legal case: United States v. Barnes, No. 3:19-cr-00112-K, ECF No. 355 | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | A legal document was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, arguing against the government's reliance o... | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Hearing | A hearing is scheduled in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, at which a redacted ind... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-02-01 | Court decision | A decision was rendered in the case of United States v. McGrain. | W.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2022-01-25 | Legal proceeding | A ruling was made in the United States v. Guzman Loera case by the Second Circuit. | Second Circuit | View |
| 2022-01-06 | Legal proceeding | Court case: United States v. Bright | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2022-01-01 | Legal case | Ruling in United States v. Guzman Loera, where the Second Circuit affirmed the denial of a hearin... | Second Circuit | View |
| 2021-12-16 | Court ruling | The Court denied the Government's motion to preclude remaining witnesses. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-12-04 | Legal proceeding | The ongoing trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), where the gove... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-08-03 | Court proceeding | A transcript was recorded in the case United States v. Kelly. | E.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal order | The Court issued an Order directing the parties to indicate whether they propose any redactions t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-05-10 | Legal ruling | A ruling was made in the case United States v. Chandler. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2021-04-29 | Sentencing hearing | Sentencing hearing for the case United States v. Tiffany Days. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court filing | Filing of Document 20-3 in Case 21-770, which is Exhibit N, a Memorandum Opinion and Order from C... | District of New Mexico | View |
| 2021-01-11 | Legal decision | Certiorari denied for United States v. Brown, 800 F. App’x 455 (9th Cir. 2020). | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Maxwell, 534 F. Supp. 3d 299 (S.D.N.Y. 2021) case cited. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2021-01-01 | Legal case | Citation of United States v. McCoy, 995 F.3d 32 (2d Cir. 2021). | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2021-01-01 | Legal decision | Decision in the case United States v. Skelos. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2021-01-01 | Legal case | Russell v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2601 (2021) | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-01 | Legal case | Citation of United States v. Khalupsky, 5 F.4th 279 (2d Cir. 2021). | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2020-09-23 | N/A | Deadline for parties to respond to the United States' letter brief. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020240.jpg
This document appears to be page 88 of a House Oversight report detailing Edward Snowden's employment history and intelligence theft. It describes his transition from Dell to Booz Allen Hamilton in March 2013, alleging he took a pay cut to access 'Level 3' documents described as 'the Keys to the Kingdom.' The text outlines the specific access privileges he gained and lost during this transition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020235.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a narrative report or book regarding the Edward Snowden leaks. It details the initial anonymous communications between Snowden (using the handle 'Citizen 4') and filmmaker Laura Poitras. The text describes Snowden's offer to provide evidence of illegal NSA surveillance and Presidential Policy 20 (signed by Obama in Oct 2012), his operational security concerns, and his specific request to be publicly identified ('nailed to the cross') to prevent suspicion from falling on his colleagues or loved ones.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020230.jpg
This document page, stamped with a House Oversight footer, details the formation of the Freedom of the Press Foundation in 2012 to fund WikiLeaks and Bradley Manning amidst financial blockades. It narrates the prelude to the Snowden leaks, describing Edward Snowden's admiration for journalist Glenn Greenwald's anti-surveillance writings and Snowden's initial attempts (under the alias Cincinnatus) to contact Greenwald and urge him to use email encryption. It highlights specific blog posts from November 2012 where Greenwald criticized the US surveillance state.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020228.jpg
The document discusses the security vulnerabilities within the NSA created by a "culture of transparency" and reliance on civilian contractors like Edward Snowden, who worked for Dell. It highlights how Snowden was able to openly organize crypto parties and communicate with anti-NSA activists while working as a contractor, as legal constraints prevented the NSA from monitoring his private activities without a FISA warrant.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018416.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book or manuscript (specifically referencing 'The Seventh Sense,' a concept and likely book title) analyzing US-China relations through the lens of network theory. It argues that China is not currently a military threat to the US but faces significant internal demographic and economic challenges. The text draws parallels to the diplomatic rapprochement of the 1970s, citing Nixon and Kissinger's efforts to engage with Zhou Enlai to avoid Chinese isolation. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation, potentially related to documents possessed by or sent to Epstein associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018413.jpg
This text outlines a grand strategy for US foreign policy regarding China, advocating for a "gatekept order" rather than direct containment. It argues for creating a strong network based on US values that other nations can join conditionally, while urging cooperation on global issues to avoid fatal conflict. The passage also introduces the concept of "Seventh Sense" logic, comparing geopolitical shifts to complex adaptive systems in nature.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018412.jpg
This document (page 180, Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018412) appears to be a page from a geopolitical strategy manuscript or policy paper. It analyzes US-China relations, arguing that traditional containment strategies are failing (citing the AIIB example from 2014) and discussing cultural differences in transparency ('diamonds vs jade'). The author proposes that the greatest threat is not a specific nation but the 'evolution of the network itself' and suggests a grand strategy of 'Hard Gatekeeping' modeled after Metternich's 'Concert of Nations'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018409.jpg
This document appears to be page 177 of a manuscript or policy paper (often attributed to Jeffrey Epstein in the context of House Oversight releases) discussing a geopolitical strategy termed 'Hard Gatekeeping.' The text argues for shifting US military focus away from traditional hardware (aircraft carriers, bombers) toward 'topological control' and defense against contagions, panic, and cyberattacks. It cites historical examples of defensive strategies (Roman Empire, Tokugawa Japan, Tang China) and references a 2015 scientific paper on network theory and 'super spreaders.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018407.jpg
This page (175) appears to be from a strategic policy paper or manuscript discussing the concept of 'Hard Gatekeeping' in international relations and cyber security. It argues for a system where nations must adhere to certain standards (like IPv6 or nuclear non-proliferation) to benefit from inclusion in 'American gatekept systems.' It cites Brian Arthur's power-law dynamics and references historical precedents like the Thirty Years War to argue against forced inclusion while maintaining strategic exclusivity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018403.jpg
This document appears to be page 171 of a geopolitical manuscript or report obtained by House Oversight. It discusses a strategy called 'Hard Gatekeeping' for the United States in a connected age, arguing for the control of 'topological mechanisms of power' rather than traditional democratization or military force. The text references Google and Al-Qaeda to illustrate modern asymmetric power, and quotes historian Carl Schmitt and Lord Balfour to draw historical parallels regarding borders, spatial divisions, and imperial defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018399.jpg
This document appears to be page 167 of a book manuscript (Chapter Ten: Defense in Depth), marked as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. The text recounts the author's meeting in Beijing with retired Chinese diplomat Huang Hua, discussing the philosophical differences between Western goal-oriented thinking and Chinese assessment of the 'nature of the age.' It contrasts the eras of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, specifically regarding their foreign policy and stance on the likelihood of war.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016386.jpg
This document is page 166 from a collection of essays, stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It features an essay titled 'The Rights of Machines' by Harvard geneticist George M. Church. The text discusses the ethical implications of artificial intelligence, referencing Norbert Wiener's 1950 work, various sci-fi films, and the concept of 'roboethics' and rights for sentient machines. The date is inferred to be around 2018 based on the text mentioning 'sixty-eight years' since 1950.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016365.jpg
This text explores the intersection of cybernetics, AI, and art, quoting von Foerster on circular thinking and introducing Hito Steyerl's concept of "artificial stupidity." Steyerl argues that current AI is often overrated and unsophisticated, citing the use of simple Twitter bots in political events like the 2016 U.S. election and Brexit as examples of low-grade technology having monumental social impacts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016360.jpg
This page (140) from a House Oversight document (stamped 016360) appears to be a transcript or essay discussing the societal impacts of 'Extreme Wealth' and 'AI and Society.' The speaker defends billionaire philanthropy, specifically citing Bill Gates, the Ford Foundation, and the Sloan Foundation as entities filling gaps left by the government. The text also contrasts US wealth mobility favorably against European hereditary wealth and argues for a data-centric approach to regulating Artificial Intelligence, drawing an analogy between AI algorithms and government bureaucracies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016359.jpg
This document appears to be page 139 of a larger file, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016359. It contains the text of an essay or manifesto discussing sociological topics such as data-driven governance, media polarization, and income inequality. The author uses the 'pickup truck test' to illustrate the disconnect between the upper classes (referenced as 'Manhattanites') and the average American.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016358.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a scientific essay or transcript included in a House Oversight Committee investigation file (likely related to MIT Media Lab/Epstein). The text discusses 'social sampling,' 'human AI,' and the creation of 'trust networks' for data, drawing comparisons to the U.S. Census and Toyota's continuous improvement methods. The author (unnamed on this page, but utilizing first-person language like 'I refer to as') advocates for digital ID badges and quantitative feedback to improve organizational decision-making.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014466.jpg
This is page 7 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch European Equity Strategy report dated December 1, 2016. The content analyzes global economic trends, specifically focusing on Federal Reserve and ECB monetary policies, inflation forecasts, and GDP growth projections for 2017-2018. While the text itself contains no mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates, the document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014466', indicating it was part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014464.jpg
A page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'European Equity Strategy' report dated December 1, 2016. The document analyzes market volatility and investment strategies following Brexit and the 2016 US Presidential election, discussing asset rotations into cyclicals and financials. It bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014464', indicating it was produced during a congressional investigation, likely related to financial records of Jeffrey Epstein or associated banks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014463.jpg
This is a page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'European Equity Strategy' report dated December 1, 2016. The text analyzes market trends from 2016, specifically noting the impact of Brexit and Donald Trump's election victory on Financials, Cyclicals, and inflation rates. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp (suggesting it was part of a larger subpoena, likely related to financial investigations involving Epstein), this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014457.jpg
This document outlines the 'Fundamental Equity Opinion Key' and 'Income Ratings' used by Bank of America Merrill Lynch research, defining investment ratings such as Buy, Neutral, and Underperform alongside volatility risk indicators. It also provides extensive legal and regulatory disclosures regarding the distribution of research reports by various international affiliates in jurisdictions including the UK, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Australia. The page details conflicts of interest policies and specifies that prices mentioned are for informational purposes only.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014453.jpg
This document is page 22 of a 'Global Cross Asset Strategy - Year Ahead' report dated November 30, 2016, produced by Bank of America Merrill Lynch. It details financial risks associated with various market sectors including Equity, Fixed Income, Volatility, and FX trades, referencing central bank policies (Fed, ECB, BOJ, BoE). The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014453, indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014452.jpg
This document is page 21 of a 'Global Cross Asset Strategy' report produced by Bank of America Merrill Lynch on November 30, 2016. It analyzes market volatility following Brexit and the US presidential election, noting that volatility remained lower than expected. The text outlines specific hedging strategies the bank is employing, including Eurostoxx put spreads regarding the Italian referendum and closing a position on China risk. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014452', indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014451.jpg
This is a page from a 'Global Cross Asset Strategy - Year Ahead' report published by Bank of America Merrill Lynch on November 30, 2016. It details financial market strategies regarding credit spreads in Europe and the US, specifically recommending buying 30-year US Investment Grade (IG) industrial spreads and analyzing European 'Long Xover short Main' positions. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014451', indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to financial institutions' records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014450.jpg
This document is page 19 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'Global Cross Asset Strategy' report dated November 30, 2016. It provides financial analysis recommending a long position in European Healthcare equities, citing favorable valuations compared to the Food & Beverage sector and reduced regulatory risk following the Republican win in the US elections. The page includes four charts (34-37) illustrating dividend growth forecasts and price-to-earnings ratios. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014450, indicating its inclusion in a congressional oversight investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014448.jpg
This document from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch report discusses investment strategies for Japanese and European equities. It highlights the potential for Japanese equities to run further due to a stronger USD and analyzes European equities' attractiveness based on dividend yields relative to other regions and asset classes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity