| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Suarez
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Plaza-Andrades
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Tykarsky
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Perez
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Pierre-Louis
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Paulino
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Pascarella
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Payner
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Pipola
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Potamitis
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Prisco
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Polos
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Olivieri
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Oshatz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Post
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Quinones
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Watkins
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Abdullahu
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Walters
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Esposito
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sattar
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
page
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Salerno
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ulbricht
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Tramunti
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Modification of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clarification of provisions in paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the selecti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran / U.S.-led attack | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of a plea agreement | Eleventh Circuit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cold War | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agrees to plea deal (NPA) for 18 months imprisonment. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential Iranian nuclear targeting of US logistics hubs. | Middle East / Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Public protests and Mubarak's time of need | Cairo, Egypt | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US shipment of battery-operated TV sets to Pacific islands. | Pacific Ocean islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical conflict/coalition warfare between US and Iran | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential U.S. attack on Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed peace conference to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palestinian bid for full U.N. membership. | United Nations | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States' decision to pursue warmer ties with Tehran. | International | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Non-prosecution agreement | Epstein agreed to a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment on two charges, and in return, the ... | N/A | View |
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012391,' lists historical precedents of U.S. Presidents from 1876 to 1990 using signing statements to challenge the constitutionality of 'legislative veto' provisions in various acts. Presidents including Kennedy, Nixon, Reagan, and Grant are cited as having declared they would not be bound by such provisions, treating them as non-binding requests or nullities. The document appears to be legal or historical research compiled for a government body, but its content does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a legal memorandum from Assistant Attorney General Walter Dellinger regarding the President's constitutional authority to decline enforcement of a law believed to be unconstitutional, even after signing it. The analysis relies on legal precedent, including the Myers case, and historical examples from Presidents Eisenhower and Roosevelt. Despite the user's query, this document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related activities.
This document is a legal memorandum, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012387', outlining the constitutional basis for a U.S. President to refuse to enforce a statute believed to be unconstitutional. It details the President's duty to defend executive power and uses the 1926 Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, involving President Wilson, as a key historical precedent. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This legal memorandum, dated November 2, 1994, is addressed to Abner J. Mikva, Counsel to the President. It argues that the President has the constitutional authority to decline to execute statutes he believes are unconstitutional, citing judicial precedent from cases like Myers v. United States and long-standing executive branch practice. The memorandum then begins to lay out specific propositions for how and when this authority should be exercised, starting with the President's obligation to act within the bounds of the Constitution.
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislation concerning trafficking victims. The DOJ opposes several provisions, including the creation of a guardian ad litem program and a confidentiality section that could impede law enforcement, and recommends changes to language that would create a legal obligation for government-funded counsel. The DOJ also recommends striking a 2% funding cap for training and ensuring that both the DOJ and DHS are involved with HHS in the development of a $5 million pilot program.
This document is a commentary from the Department of Justice (DOJ) expressing opposition to proposed legislative changes outlined in Sections 224, 231, 232, and 233 related to human trafficking laws. The DOJ argues that the proposed changes are unnecessary, burdensome, or based on a misunderstanding of existing laws and departmental procedures. The document defends current practices, including the use of a wide range of statutes like the Mann Act and collaborations with various organizations for training and enforcement.
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) memorandum arguing against proposed legislative changes that would expand federal jurisdiction over prostitution, pimping, and adult sex tourism. The DOJ contends that such an expansion is unnecessary, would strain federal resources, and would divert law enforcement from its core anti-trafficking mission, particularly the prosecution of child sex tourism. The document analyzes specific sections of a bill, consistently opposing the federalization of crimes it believes are better handled at the state and local level.
This Department of Justice (DOJ) document outlines the department's opposition to several proposed legislative amendments concerning human trafficking, specifically sections 214 and 221 of an unspecified bill. The DOJ argues that the changes are redundant, create legally problematic strict liability offenses without an affirmative defense, and improperly federalize crimes like pandering and pimping that are historically handled at the state level. The DOJ asserts that its existing authority under laws like the Mann Act is sufficient for prosecuting federal trafficking crimes.
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis and opposition to Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims, likely from around 2008. The DOJ argues the bill's grant authorizations are redundant, create conflicts of interest with NGOs, improperly involve the Department of State in domestic issues, and wrongly extend victim benefits to prostitutes under the Mann Act who do not meet the legal definition of a victim unless under 18.
This document, page 5 of a submission to House Oversight, is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes regarding human trafficking. The DOJ opposes several provisions, such as extending a victim's 'continued presence' during a civil suit and removing the Attorney General's role in T-visa eligibility. The DOJ also recommends specific textual changes to avoid creating new legal liabilities for the government and to consolidate authority under the Attorney General rather than a new task force.
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis objecting to three sections of a proposed anti-trafficking act. The DOJ argues against Section 107 on separation of powers grounds, Section 108 for proposing a logistically difficult and insecure interagency database, and Section 109 for interfering with the President's policy-making authority. The document is part of a larger collection labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' but does not contain any specific information about Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed anti-trafficking legislation, marked as page 2 of a collection from 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The DOJ raises concerns about several sections, recommending amendments to ensure U.S. international standards mirror domestic policies that prioritize both sex and labor trafficking. The department also advocates for greater flexibility in partnering with aid organizations and in allowing the Secretary of State to evaluate foreign governments' anti-trafficking efforts on a case-by-case basis, especially concerning cases with lenient sentences for cooperating defendants.
Two opinion columns from November 9, 2012, analyze the aftermath of the recent presidential election. Gail Collins satirically discusses the "fiscal cliff" and the Republican reaction to losing, while Nicholas D. Kristof argues that the Republican party must adapt to changing demographics (Hispanic voters, women) or risk becoming irrelevant.
This document is a page from The Virgin Islands Daily News dated November 9, 2012. The main articles report on the arrest of boat captain Kyle Coleman for the 2011 parasailing death of Bernice Kraftcheck, and the ongoing struggles of Luis Hospital in St. Croix to meet federal standards set by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Although provided in the context of an Epstein-related query, the document itself does not contain any mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or properties; its relevance likely stems from its origin in the U.S. Virgin Islands and its collection as part of a larger set of documents, indicated by the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018866' label.
This document is page 26 of a Marina Market Analysis report, providing an overview of national boating trends in the United States with data primarily from 2014. It details industry sales figures from 2006 to 2014, participant demographics, and boat registration statistics by state, referencing data from the National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA). While the document itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals, the footer contains 'IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina' and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates number, suggesting it was collected as evidence for an investigation, possibly due to IGY's connection with Epstein's travels.
This document, page 16 of a report labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018826', is an economic and hotel market analysis for the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) covering the period from 2008 to 2014. It presents data on tourism (stay-over arrivals), economic health (GDP per capita), and a detailed breakdown of hotel performance metrics comparing 2013 and 2014. The analysis shows an increase in hotel occupancy, room revenues, and average daily rates in 2014.
This document is an economic area analysis of the U.S. Virgin Islands, presenting commerce and tourism data from 2005 to 2014. It includes a chart on USVI's exports, imports, and GTP, and a detailed table on visitor arrivals and expenditures, sourced from the VI Bureau of Economic Research. The document's footer mentions 'IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina' and it is labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018823', suggesting it's part of an appraisal or investigation, possibly connected to Jeffrey Epstein's assets and activities in the region.
This document is a page from an economic analysis report for the U.S. Virgin Islands, covering the years 2007-2014. It highlights the severe negative impact of the Hovensa refinery's closure (c. 2012) on the territory's exports, particularly refined petroleum. The document, sourced from the VI Bureau of Economic Research, also notes the economy's predominant reliance on the tourism industry.
This document, page 10 of a report labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018820', provides a political and economic analysis of the U.S. Virgin Islands for the period 2005-2014. It details the territory's legislative structure, population decline after a 2008 peak, and economic struggles, including the 2012 closure of the Hovensa refinery. The document's relevance to the Epstein case is established by the footer, which mentions 'IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina', a marina company associated with Epstein's yachts.
This document is an area analysis of the U.S. Virgin Islands, providing a general overview of its geography, economy, history, and government. It details the characteristics of the main islands (St. Thomas, St. John, St. Croix), notes the economy's reliance on tourism, and outlines key historical dates and the territory's political structure. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018819' indicates this document was part of evidence collected in an investigation by the U.S. House Oversight Committee.
This document is page 6 of a property valuation report for the IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina, likely prepared by the firm 'irr'. The report confirms the valuers' independence, their compliance with RICS standards in the Caribbean, and specifies that all financial figures are in USD. It justifies the use of the income capitalization approach as the primary valuation method, deeming the sales comparison and cost approaches inapplicable due to the property type and lack of market data.
This document is page 25 of a report, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018767', providing a general overview of Las Vegas as a tourist destination. It describes the city's economy, the central role of 'the Strip', and provides tourism statistics, noting 41.1 million visitors in 2014 with a projection of 42 million for 2015. The document itself does not contain any direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals, events, or activities.
This document is page 15 of a 'GSA Investment & Acquisition Opportunity' brochure from the Stan Johnson Company, providing a location overview of St. Thomas, USVI. It describes the island's geography, history, demographics based on the 2010 census, and tourist attractions. The document identifier 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018741' indicates it was collected as evidence for a U.S. House Oversight Committee investigation, which provides the context for its relation to the Epstein case, as St. Thomas is near Epstein's private island.
This document is a 'Tenant Overview' for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), sourced from a real estate investment report by Stan Johnson Company concerning a property in St. Thomas, USVI. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018738', details the organizational structure, budget (FY2008), and high credit rating of USCIS to establish it as a reliable tenant. Despite the user's prompt and the mention of St. Thomas in the footer, the content of this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity