Don Yannella
PersonRelationship Network
EFTA00030148.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorney Andrew Patel and likely the US Attorney's Office regarding the Epstein case. The discussion centers on the Government's obligation to produce notes from a meeting with Patel's client (whose name is redacted) to the defense counsel. Patel argues that his client is not a witness, the information is not Brady material (exculpatory evidence), and that revealing his client's identity or the fact that he met with the Government could compromise his safety. Patel notes that an 'error' made by his client is contradicted by surveillance video evidence.
EFTA00029428.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 20, 2019, between attorney Andrew Patel and an unnamed correspondent (likely opposing counsel or government prosecutor). The discussion concerns the production of interview notes regarding a client ('Mr. [Redacted]') under a protective order. The sender confirms that the client's name will be provided to defense counsel only on an 'Attorney's Eyes Only' (AEO) basis to protect their identity.
EFTA00027031.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 20, 2019, between attorney Andrew Patel and government prosecutors regarding the disclosure of information about a client of Patel's in the Epstein case context (likely related to the prison guards' prosecution). Patel argues against full disclosure, citing client safety concerns, and claims his client is not a witness but rather made an error in a statement that is 'contradicted by the surveillance video evidence.' The government proposes disclosing the client's identity to defense counsel only on an 'Attorneys' Eyes Only' (AEO) basis.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity