This document is an email chain from December 20, 2019, between attorney Andrew Patel and government prosecutors regarding the disclosure of information about a client of Patel's in the Epstein case context (likely related to the prison guards' prosecution). Patel argues against full disclosure, citing client safety concerns, and claims his client is not a witness but rather made an error in a statement that is 'contradicted by the surveillance video evidence.' The government proposes disclosing the client's identity to defense counsel only on an 'Attorneys' Eyes Only' (AEO) basis.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Patel | Defense Attorney |
Attorney representing the unnamed client ('Mr. [Redacted]'); negotiating with the government regarding disclosures.
|
| Jill Shellow | Attorney |
Cc'd on the email chain; likely co-counsel or colleague of Patel.
|
| Don Yannella | Attorney |
Cc'd on the email chain; likely co-counsel or colleague of Patel.
|
| Judge Torres | Judge |
Referenced as the judge presiding over the relevant case (likely Judge Analisa Torres).
|
| Mr. [Redacted] | Client/Witness |
Andrew Patel's client. Met with the Government office. There is concern about his safety if his name is disclosed. He...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Government |
Referenced as 'the Government' and 'your Office'; prosecuting party.
|
|
| Law Office of Andrew G. Patel |
Legal practice of the sender.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction (SDNY, Judge Torres) and area code 212.
|
"we offer this as a means to ensure our client's safety while permitting the Government to comply with what you believe are your disclosure obligations."Source
"Our client is not a witness, and so this is not 3500 material, nor is it Rule 16 material."Source
"We do not believe that this is in fact Brady material, but rather is an error made by our client that we understand is contradicted by the surveillance video evidence."Source
"we have an obligation to make sure that our client is not harmed by the possible release of the fact that he met with your Office."Source
"produce Mr. [REDACTED] name and your contact information to defense counsel on an AEO basis."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,844 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document