| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
U.S. Treasury Department
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
IRS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of the Treasury
|
Organizational hierarchy |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
CFPB
|
Memorandum of understanding mou |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
IG
|
Regulatory enforcement |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Inter agency cooperation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-17 | N/A | FBI received attached SD (Suspicious Disclosure/Secure Disclosure) from United Kingdom regarding ... | N/A | View |
| 2019-10-13 | N/A | Form 114 (FBAR) filed with FinCEN on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | N/A | View |
| 2014-02-01 | N/A | Period during which FinCEN received 33,692 marijuana-related SAR filings. | USA | View |
| 2014-02-01 | N/A | Publication of the FinCEN Memo in coordination with the Cole Memo update. | USA | View |
| 2011-06-01 | N/A | FinCEN entered into an MOU with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to provide access... | United States | View |
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Seven Money Services Businesses (MSBs) were subject to enforcement actions for failure to register. | USA | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | FinCEN assessed a $12 million penalty and DOJ assessed a $15 million forfeiture against Sigue Cor... | USA | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | Formation of the Bank Secrecy Act Advisory Group (BSAAG) | United States | View |
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law opposing a motion to dismiss a derivative lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase's board regarding their oversight of Jeffrey Epstein. It alleges that the Board, including CEO Jamie Dimon, ignored red flags about Epstein's sex trafficking and financial crimes (such as massive cash withdrawals) to retain him as a client, failed to implement required BSA/AML monitoring systems, and violated a Deferred Prosecution Agreement related to Madoff. The plaintiffs argue that demand on the board is excused because a majority of directors face liability or lack independence.
This document is Exhibit 1 filed in the case USVI v. JPMorgan Chase (related to Jeffrey Epstein), but the content is the January 2014 Deferred Prosecution Agreement between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and JPMorgan Chase regarding the Madoff Ponzi scheme. JPMorgan admitted to violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, specifically failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and failing to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) in the U.S. despite having suspicions about Madoff's returns. The bank agreed to forfeit $1.7 billion to the United States.
This document is a redacted email dated March 25, 2021, forwarding a password-protected attachment containing financial intelligence from FIU Germany regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The subject line explicitly links the intelligence to 'Human Trafficking/Child exploitation' and references FinCEN case 301188. The email outlines strict law enforcement sensitivity terms for the FBI regarding the handling and non-disclosure of the attached information.
This document is an email dated September 17, 2020, from a MAPA detailee at FinCEN to the FBI. It forwards a secure attachment ('United_Kingdom_Disclosure_Dissemination.pdf') from the UK Financial Intelligence Unit regarding Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation related to Ghislaine Maxwell and a redacted individual (presumably Jeffrey Epstein). The email outlines strict confidentiality and usage terms for the law enforcement sensitive material.
An email dated October 30, 2019, from a Senior Financial Investigator (likely a contractor with Squad C-40) to an FBI agent in New York. The email attaches flowcharts related to FinCEN data concerning TD Bank and Charles Schwab accounts. The document includes a standard warning regarding the sensitive nature of Bank Secrecy Act information.
This document is an email chain from February and March 2020 between the SDNY US Attorney's Office and the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation. The correspondence coordinates investigative steps, including reviewing seized message pads from Epstein's residence, tracing financial transfers from Epstein to Maxwell since 2005, and verifying her citizenship and assets. It also discusses operational security regarding the TECS border system, noting that running Maxwell's name triggers alerts at JFK and that she had 'hit' the system three times in the preceding month.
This document is an email chain from February and March 2020 between the SDNY Assistant United States Attorney and the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'). The AUSA requests specific actions, including reviewing message pads seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residence, tracing financial transfers from Epstein to Maxwell since 2005, verifying her UK and French citizenship, and checking for property ownership. The Task Force responds with updates on TECS border system alerts (noting she hit the system three times in the past month) and negative results from property searches.
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated January 14, 2020. It summarizes various legal news stories, including a lawsuit filed by Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig against The New York Times for defamation, claiming the paper falsely implied he defended taking donations from Jeffrey Epstein. Other stories include the Bridgegate Supreme Court case, the Harvey Weinstein trial, and various fraud and corruption cases.
This document is an email chain from August 2019 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The correspondence coordinates the transfer of specific Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) records and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) information related to Jeffrey Epstein from FinCEN to the SDNY prosecution team. The chain begins with an introduction by an SDNY Co-Chief and concludes with the SDNY team attempting to verify receipt of the specific financial records identified by FinCEN.
This document is an email chain from May 3, 2021, among attorneys at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing a forwarded invitation from Marshall L. Miller (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) for a 'White Collar Crime Committee' meeting. The internal USANYS discussion links the committee's topic—Rule 17 subpoenas—to the Ghislaine Maxwell case, noting a recent 'strong opinion' from Judge Alison J. Nathan (AJN) regarding a motion to quash a Rule 17 subpoena in the Maxwell trial. The attached memo details the committee's agenda, including a talk by former FinCEN Director Ken Blanco and proposed revisions to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17.
This document is a report from the Public Corruption Unit (likely SDNY) summarizing its work in 2018 and 2019. It details high-profile prosecutions including those of Michael Avenatti, Lev Parnas, Igor Fruman, and Jeffrey Epstein. The report specifically mentions charges against MCC officers for falsifying records related to Epstein's suicide and describes a hearing where Epstein's victims were allowed to address the court.
An email dated August 31, 2020, between US Attorney's Office (USANYS) personnel with the subject 'FinCEN/Bank Letters'. The email contains numerous attachments referencing the 'FinCEN Files' investigation, involving letters and requests for comment from investigative journalists (ICIJ, BuzzFeed, BBC) to major financial institutions like Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, and Barclays regarding suspicious activity reports.
This document is a draft financial summary dated June 30, 2020, detailing Ghislaine Maxwell's related accounts, balances, and recent significant transactions. It highlights a total balance of nearly $5 million, primarily held in the 'Montpelier Trust' at UBS, and links Maxwell to this trust and 'Granite Reality LLC' through fund transfers and the purchase of the New Hampshire property where she was arrested. The report also notes foreign bank accounts (Barclays, Wealth at Work) disclosed in 2018 FBAR filings with unknown current balances.
This document is a series of emails from whistleblower Christopher Dilorio to FinCEN and redacted recipients, alleging a massive conspiracy involving the SEC, Apollo Global Management (Leon Black, Josh Harris), Jeffrey Epstein, and Jared Kushner. Dilorio claims that Apollo used money laundering shells and pump-and-dump schemes (like DryShips and ESWW) and that the SEC is complicit in covering up these crimes. The emails highlight financial ties between Apollo and Kushner's family business, specifically loans made shortly after White House meetings, and asserts that Epstein serves as a front for these illicit financial activities.
This page from an Ackrell Capital Cannabis Investment Report outlines seven due diligence steps for financial institutions dealing with marijuana-related businesses. It also details the FinCEN Memo's guidelines for filing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), specifically distinguishing between "Marijuana Limited," "Marijuana Priority," and "Marijuana Termination" filings.
This document is page 77 of a 2017 report by Ackrell Capital, LLC, discussing the U.S. legal landscape for the cannabis industry. It specifically details the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), money laundering statutes, and the 2014 FinCEN Memo regarding how financial institutions should handle marijuana-related businesses and file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 68 of a Cannabis Investment Report published by Ackrell Capital in December 2017. It features a diagram illustrating federal laws impacting the cannabis industry, categorized into Drug/Food Regulation, Banking/Finance, and Intellectual Property. The text specifically defines the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970 and notes its enforcement by the DEA. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document is page 11 of a 2017 Ackrell Capital executive summary report analyzing the cannabis industry. It discusses market dynamics, specifically the anticipated supply from South America, and details the significant banking challenges U.S. cannabis companies face due to federal laws and the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), referencing FinCEN data on Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 5 of an executive summary from a 2017 report by Ackrell Capital, LLC regarding the cannabis industry. It features a text summary and a circular infographic detailing federal laws and policies impacting the industry, categorized into Drug and Food Regulation, Banking and Finance, and Intellectual Property. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024641' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
This document is page 171 from a 2017 report by Ackrell Capital, LLC. It contains a 'Glossary of Terms' specifically related to the cannabis industry (defining terms like THCA, Edible, Flower, Ganja) and relevant regulatory bodies (DEA, FDA, FinCEN). While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a Congressional investigation (potentially swept up in a broader request for financial documents), the content itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his specific activities.
This document is page 23 of a report by Protiviti, likely produced for the House Oversight Committee, detailing common deficiencies in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance programs. It cites specific enforcement actions and financial penalties against E*TRADE (2008-2009) and Sigue Corporation (2008) for failures in suspicious activity monitoring and reporting. The text outlines systemic violations such as failure to file SARs, lack of independent testing, and inadequate training, serving as a reference for regulatory expectations.
This document is page 20 of a regulatory guide produced by Protiviti, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. It outlines various enforcement actions available to U.S. regulators regarding Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance, ranging from Commitment Letters and MOUs to Civil Money Penalties and the so-called 'Death Penalty' (charter revocation). It also defines the enforcement authority of FinCEN and mentions Deferred Prosecution Agreements.
This document is page 18 of a report produced by the consulting firm Protiviti, likely part of a production to the House Oversight Committee (indicated by the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024124). The text provides a high-level overview of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), detailing its history, mission, and role in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulation. It outlines FinCEN's initiatives, including the BSAAG and FFETF, and describes various information-sharing systems like the BSA E-Filing System and Egmont Secure Web.
This document is page 15 of a report produced by the consulting firm Protiviti, bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It outlines the U.S. federal agencies responsible for combating money laundering and terrorist financing (including specific offices within Treasury, DOJ, and the State Department) and details key regulatory publications such as the FFIEC Bank Secrecy Act/AML Examination Handbook.
This document appears to be a news article or report excerpt contained within House Oversight files (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029966). It details a series of hearings and meetings in Washington involving federal regulators (FinCEN, DOJ, Secret Service) and Bitcoin advocates (Murck, Andresen). The text highlights how advocates successfully shifted the regulatory narrative from criminal concerns (Silk Road, money laundering) to the economic importance of innovation, gaining support from key figures like Jennifer Shasky Calvery and activist 'Allen'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity