| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Albinus
|
Professional historical category |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cheselden
|
Professional historical category |
5
|
1 |
This text critiques the reliance on "mechanical objectivity" and algorithms in legal and social domains, drawing parallels to the history of science. It warns against the dangers of proprietary "black box" algorithms in criminal justice, citing issues with trade secrets impeding fair defense and the potential for algorithmic bias to serve as a proxy for race.
This document appears to be a page (162) from a book or academic text discussing the history and philosophy of science, specifically the evolution of 'scientific objectivity.' It traces the shift from 18th-century idealization (Goethe) to 19th-century mechanical objectivity, and finally to the return of 'trained judgment' in the 1930s and 1940s regarding complex data like EEGs and stellar spectra. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016965' stamp, indicating it is part of a larger collection of evidence gathered by the House Oversight Committee, likely related to the Epstein investigation, though the text itself contains no direct references to Epstein, his associates, or criminal activity.
This document appears to be page 45 of a manuscript or book discussing the philosophical, spiritual, and scientific concepts of 'energy.' It references various historical figures and their theories on life forces, spanning from religious rituals (Tenebrae) to physics (Feynman, Schroedinger) and psychology (Freud, Maslow). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence in a congressional investigation.
The text analyzes the origins and nature of the First World War, focusing on the pervasive "cult of the offensive" and the mistaken belief that industrialization would lead to swift victories. It highlights the tragic reality of mechanized warfare, where tools like the machine gun, intended to shorten conflicts, instead led to prolonged slaughter and massive casualties, such as at the Somme.
This document is page 163 of a House Oversight production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016383). It contains the text of an academic or philosophical essay discussing the dangers of 'mechanical objectivity' and the use of algorithms ('algorists') in criminal justice sentencing. The author argues against relying on 'black box' algorithms that hide trade secrets, citing Rebecca Wexler's 2018 work on intellectual property in the criminal justice system and drawing parallels to historical issues in physics with Kodak and Ilford film.
This document appears to be page 162 of a book or academic essay regarding the history and philosophy of science (likely 'Objectivity' by Daston and Galison). The text discusses the evolution of scientific representation from 18th-century 'idealization' (perfecting nature) to 19th-century 'mechanical objectivity' (hands-off recording), and finally to the mid-20th-century reliance on 'trained judgment.' While the content is purely academic, the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was included in a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity