| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Goethe
|
Professional historical category |
5
|
1 |
This document appears to be a page (162) from a book or academic text discussing the history and philosophy of science, specifically the evolution of 'scientific objectivity.' It traces the shift from 18th-century idealization (Goethe) to 19th-century mechanical objectivity, and finally to the return of 'trained judgment' in the 1930s and 1940s regarding complex data like EEGs and stellar spectra. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016965' stamp, indicating it is part of a larger collection of evidence gathered by the House Oversight Committee, likely related to the Epstein investigation, though the text itself contains no direct references to Epstein, his associates, or criminal activity.
This document appears to be page 162 of a book or academic essay regarding the history and philosophy of science (likely 'Objectivity' by Daston and Galison). The text discusses the evolution of scientific representation from 18th-century 'idealization' (perfecting nature) to 19th-century 'mechanical objectivity' (hands-off recording), and finally to the mid-20th-century reliance on 'trained judgment.' While the content is purely academic, the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was included in a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity