This document is a handwritten legal argument filed in court on October 12, 2021, challenging a court's interpretation of statute ยง3283. The author argues that the statute's legislative history, originating from the 1986 Sexual Abuse Act, demonstrates its narrow purpose is for sexual assault and related offenses, not a broader application. The argument cites several legal cases (Davis, Pledges, Bridges) to contend that the court's findings are 'patently wrong'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity