Bailey
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995-01-01 | Legal case | The case United States v. Bailey is cited as a reference. | United States | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009166.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing arguing against a defendant's motion. The defendant seeks to strike a motion to intervene filed by 'Juror 50', claiming it is inappropriate and not a 'judicial document' deserving public access. The author of this filing refutes these claims, arguing that the defendant's cited legal precedents are inapplicable and that Juror 50's motion is relevant to the judicial process and should not be struck.
DOJ-OGR-00008914.jpg
This legal document is a court order from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 11, 2022. The Court denies two separate requests: first, it denies Juror 50's motion to intervene in the criminal case, and second, it denies the Defendant's requests to either strike or seal Juror 50's motion. The Court's reasoning relies on legal precedent, stating that motions to strike are disfavored and that Juror 50's motion qualifies as a judicial document subject to the presumption of public access.
DOJ-OGR-00005184.jpg
This handwritten legal note analyzes the interpretation of 18 USC §3283, focusing on the definitions of 'sexual abuse' and 'exploitation'. It discusses the Fifth Circuit's 2015 decision in United States v. Dierl, where the court used a broader definition of sexual abuse from 18 USC §3509 to include exploitation. The author notes this legal 'work around' creates a superfluity issue, referencing the 1995 case United States v. Bailey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016543.jpg
This page from a legal text discusses the limitations of political supervision and electoral accountability in ensuring rigorous prosecution, particularly for marginalized groups like undocumented immigrants and prisoners. It evaluates alternative mechanisms such as judicial review and federal oversight to address underenforcement, while footnotes provide citations regarding public corruption laws and statistics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020615.jpg
This document appears to be page 156 (Appendix 2) of a report produced for the House Oversight Committee, likely concerning Chinese foreign influence operations. The top half contains endnotes citing various 2016-2018 news articles about Chinese influence in Canadian politics, academia, and society. The bottom half is a text section titled 'FRANCE' which analyzes the historical and contemporary relationship between France and China, noting that while France historically had favorable diplomatic ties dating back to Charles de Gaulle, public opinion has turned negative as of 2017. NOTE: Despite the user prompt context, this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or his network.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity