| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NBC
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Patrick Poole
|
Citation |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Pan
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Shelby Steele
|
Intellectual citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jamie
|
Professional correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boone
|
Professional correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jamie
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jamie
|
Professional interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jamie
|
Professional political ally |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boone
|
Professional political ally |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jamie
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boone
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
FPR
|
Interviewer interviewee |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OPM
|
Executive firm |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OPM
|
Executive representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OPM
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Shelby Steele
|
Intellectual reference |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andy McCarthy
|
Professional intellectual |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-25 | Court filing | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, filed a letter to t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-01-25 | Legal filing | Document 582 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from January 14, 2022, to January 26, 2022. Key events include Judge Nathan scheduling Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and granting an exclusion under the Speedy Trial Act until April 2022 to allow for post-trial motions. The docket also records various letters from media organizations (Miami Herald, ABC, NBC, NY Times) regarding the unsealing of documents related to Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial.
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from January 26, 2022, to February 4, 2022. It details procedural motions regarding the sealing of documents for a new trial motion, media requests for access (Daily News, ABC, NBC, NYT), and redactions of witness names. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders balancing public access with the integrity of potential inquiries and granted a defense request for an extension of time for post-verdict motions.
This document is the signature page (page 4 of 4) of a legal filing, Document 582 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Dated January 24, 2022, and filed the next day, it is signed by Nathan Siegel of the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, acting as the attorney for American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. and NBCUniversal News Group.
This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.
This document is an excerpt from an interview where a speaker named Siegel discusses the concepts of "Inner Jihad," the "Turnaround Moment," and "mirroring" in the context of addressing an "Islamic Enemy" and international conflict. Siegel advocates for a psychological shift to stop enabling enemy behavior, suggesting symmetrical responses ("mirroring") to aggression, while also highlighting the need to assert moral asymmetry regarding issues like educational hate speech. The text references the political landscape involving Israel, the Palestinian Authority, and US foreign policy.
This document appears to be a page from an interview transcript, likely from FrontPage Magazine, featuring an interviewee named Siegel. The text discusses the 'Control Factor' in the context of Islamic extremism, specifically analyzing the Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan and the Muslim Brotherhood's strategies in America. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger production of documents to the House Oversight Committee, though it contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his known associates on this specific page.
This document contains an interview transcript where a speaker named Siegel discusses the "Control Factor" in relation to Western responses to Islam and terrorism. Siegel argues that Western leaders and media minimize the threat of Islamic extremism to feel in control, and that concepts like "white guilt" lead to appeasement strategies that ultimately fail because the enemy does not respond reciprocally.
This document is a transcript of an interview with a subject named Siegel, who outlines the threat of "Islamic Enemy" and Jihad against the West. Siegel distinguishes between violent Jihad and "Civilization Jihad," describing the latter as an infiltration of Western society, law, and institutions by groups like the Muslim Brotherhood to establish Islamic supremacy.
This document appears to be a page from a transcript or correspondence involving a person named Siegel, likely a psychologist or political commentator. Siegel discusses the psychological concept of the 'Control Factor,' comparing societal denial of threats (specifically mentioning an 'Islamic Enemy') to the plot arc of a horror film where characters initially ignore danger. The text is part of a House Oversight Committee release, as indicated by the footer.
This document features an interview where a speaker named Siegel discusses the concept of "mirroring" in geopolitical conflicts, drawing an analogy to the addict/enabler relationship. Siegel argues for adopting symmetrical responses to enemies like Hamas and criticizes false moral equivalencies, such as those made between Palestinian and Israeli schoolbooks. The text also references historical events like the Benghazi attacks and the Ground Zero Mosque controversy to illustrate shifts in public perception regarding asymmetry and responsibility.
This document is a page from an interview transcript (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024425) between an interviewer labeled 'FP' and an interviewee named 'Siegel'. The text focuses on political and ideological discussions regarding the Muslim Brotherhood, 'Civilization Jihad', and the psychological concept of a 'Control Factor' in Western society's response to extremism. While the user prompted for an Epstein-related document, this specific page contains no mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, associates, or financial crimes; it appears to be part of a larger House Oversight document production concerning national security or ideological extremism.
This document contains an excerpt from an interview where a speaker, identified as Siegel, discusses the concepts of Western guilt, appeasement, and the "Control Factor" in relation to radical Islam. Siegel argues that Western societies often blame themselves for terrorism in a misguided attempt to feel in control, referencing political figures and events like the Fort Hood shooting to illustrate the dangers of ignoring Islamist ideology.
This document contains an excerpt of an interview or article discussing the concept of "International Institutional Jihad" and the manipulation of language by Islamic institutions to influence Western policy and perception. The text argues that organizations like the OIC use international bodies like the UN to force changes in the West, and it analyzes how terms like "peace," "freedom," and "human rights" are defined differently in Islamic contexts. It concludes with a question to "Siegel" about the "Control Factor" and the Western search for "moderate" Muslims.
This document appears to be a page from an interview or article transcript (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024422) featuring a speaker named Siegel. Siegel discusses the concept of 'Civilization Jihad,' arguing that groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, and ISNA are using 'lawfare' and infiltration to subvert Western society from within, distinct from the violent Jihad of Al-Qaeda. The text criticizes the Obama administration's approach to these threats and references figures such as Daniel Pipes, Brooke Goldstein, and Steve Emerson.
In this text, Siegel discusses the geopolitical strategy of "mirroring," likening international conflict to an addict/enabler relationship where the "enabler" must adopt the same rules as the aggressor to effect change. He argues for operational symmetry (responding to aggression in kind) but moral asymmetry (maintaining distinct values), specifically criticizing attempts to draw moral equivalence between Israeli and Palestinian educational materials. He concludes by warning that asserting these boundaries will cause initial resistance but is essential for survival.
The document is an excerpt from an interview where a speaker named Siegel discusses the concept of the "Control Factor" in relation to Western interactions with Islam and terrorism. Siegel argues that Western guilt and shame, particularly compared to Shelby Steele's concept of "white guilt," lead to appeasement strategies that fail because the "Islamic Enemy" does not respond to contrition in kind. The text also references Nidal Hasan's actions at Fort Hood as an example of willful blindness caused by this mindset.
This document features an interview segment where a respondent named Siegel discusses the political and linguistic strategies used by Islamic institutions like the OIC to influence Western policy and perception. The text critiques the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton, argues that terms like "peace" and "freedom" are redefined by enemies to disadvantage the West, and introduces the concept of the "Control Factor" which minimizes perceived threats to maintain a false sense of security. The discussion also touches on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, describing it as a one-sided Arab war against Israel.
This document outlines a perspective on the threat of "Islamic Enemy" and Jihad, categorizing it into three levels: violent Jihad, "Civilization Jihad" (societal infiltration), and International Institutional Jihad. The author, Siegel, argues that while violent attacks like 9/11 are the most visible, the non-violent infiltration of Western institutions by groups like the Muslim Brotherhood poses a more insidious threat to Western laws and freedoms.
The document is an interview transcript where Siegel advocates for a strategy of "mirroring" enemy behaviors to enforce responsibility, using the metaphor of an addict/enabler relationship to describe geopolitical conflicts. He discusses the application of this theory to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, critiques the US State Department's handling of Palestinian schoolbooks, and references the Benghazi attacks and the Ground Zero Mosque as cultural turning points. The text warns against "tolerating the intolerant" and suggests that Western civilization is fragile and must overcome its asymmetry in dealing with adversaries.
This document is an interview transcript featuring a discussion between an interviewer labeled "FP" and an interviewee named "Siegel." Siegel discusses the concept of "Civilization Jihad" attributed to the Muslim Brotherhood, drawing parallels to Cold War communist strategies, and proposes a psychological counter-strategy called "Inner Jihad" to combat the "Control Factor" and the "Islamic Enemy." The text also references specific reports and books, such as "Shariah: The Threat to America" and "The Suicide of Reason," while discussing the need for a "Turnaround Moment" in addressing these perceived threats.
This document is a transcript of an interview between an interviewer (FP) and an interviewee (Siegel). They discuss the concept of the "Control Factor" in relation to Western psychology, specifically focusing on "white guilt," appeasement policies, and the refusal to recognize threats from Islamic extremism, citing the Nidal Hasan case as an example.
This document appears to be an excerpt from an interview or article where a speaker, likely named Siegel, discusses the political and linguistic strategies used by Islamic nations and organizations against the West and Israel. The text argues that terms like "peace" and "human rights" have different meanings in Islamic contexts and criticizes Western leadership, including the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton, for misunderstanding these dynamics. It also introduces the concept of the "Control Factor" which allegedly manipulates public perception to minimize the perceived threat of radical Islam.
This document outlines a perspective on the threat of "Islamic supremacy" and "Jihad," categorizing it into three levels: violent Jihad (terrorism), "Civilization Jihad" (infiltration of societal institutions), and "International Institutional Jihad" (influence via international bodies like the UN). The author, Siegel, criticizes the Obama administration for downplaying non-violent threats and highlights the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood and affiliated groups in the US. It urges readers to review the work of specific activists who have investigated these issues.
This document is a page from a House Oversight Committee production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016417) containing an excerpt of a news article regarding 'Opportunity Zones.' It details a massive development in Baltimore's Port Covington involving Under Armour and Goldman Sachs, discussing how developers like Weller Development navigated tax laws to secure benefits for pre-planned projects. It concludes by mentioning Boulder, Colorado, as a jurisdiction that rejected such designations.
Discussion regarding Nidal Hasan, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the concept of 'Inner Jihad'.
Interview discussing the psychological 'Control Factor' in Western responses to Islamic extremism.
Discussion on political psychology, terrorism, and Western responses to Islam.
Interview discussing the psychological and political responses of the West to Islamic extremism.
A detailed analysis of 'Violent Jihad', 'Civilization Jihad', and 'International Institutional Jihad', arguing that Islamist groups are infiltrating Western society through legal and cultural means.
Discussion on political psychology, the Fort Hood shooting, and Western foreign policy responses.
Detailed analysis of three levels of Jihad: Violent, Civilization (infiltration), and International Institutional.
Detailed discussion on three levels of Jihad, specifically 'Civilization Jihad' and infiltration of Western society.
Discussion regarding political Islam, terminology, and the 'Control Factor' theory.
Discussion regarding the 'Control Factor', 'Muslim Brotherhood', and psychological aspects of political conflict.
Discussion regarding levels of Jihad, Shariah Law, and Western political response.
Discussion regarding Islamic extremism, the Muslim Brotherhood, and psychological societal responses.
Letter regarding media interests
Letter on behalf of ABC and NBCUniversal joining Miami Herald and NY Times requests to oppose sealing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity