DOJ-OGR-00020566.jpg

1.38 MB

Extraction Summary

9
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket / case log
File Size: 1.38 MB
Summary

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from January 26, 2022, to February 4, 2022. It details procedural motions regarding the sealing of documents for a new trial motion, media requests for access (Daily News, ABC, NBC, NYT), and redactions of witness names. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders balancing public access with the integrity of potential inquiries and granted a defense request for an extension of time for post-verdict motions.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the court orders and letters; filed motion for new trial
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Signed orders and addressed in letters
Matthew A. Leish Attorney
Wrote letter on behalf of Daily News, L.P.
Nathan Siegel Attorney
Wrote letter on behalf of ABC and NBC Universal
Maurene Comey AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor listed on letter re: Redaction of Witness Name
Alison Moe AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor listed on letter re: Redaction of Witness Name
Lara Pomerantz AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor listed on letter re: Redaction of Witness Name
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor listed on letter re: Redaction of Witness Name
Christian R. Everdell Defense Attorney
Wrote multiple letters on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell regarding redaction, sealing motions, and extensions

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
Daily News, L.P.
Represented by Matthew A. Leish
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc
Represented by Nathan Siegel; filed letter
NBC Universal News Group
Represented by Nathan Siegel; filed letter
USA
Government/Prosecution
New York Times Company
Filed motion to unseal juror questionnaires
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
Cited in case law (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.) regarding sealing tests

Timeline (3 events)

01/26/2022
Order issued regarding Defendant's motion for a new trial and sealing requests
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell
02/02/2022
Memo Endorsement granting extension of time for post-verdict motions
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell
02/04/2022
Order regarding post-trial house-keeping and court exhibits
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Client-Attorney Christian R. Everdell
Letters filed by Christian R. Everdell on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell
Judge Alison J. Nathan Judge-Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell
Orders issued by Judge Nathan 'as to Ghislaine Maxwell'

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court is aware there is substantial public interest in this matter and will ensure that the First Amendment right to public access is fully safeguarded."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020566.jpg
Quote #1
"Arguments in favor of sealing can be made in such a way so as not to undermine the grounds for seeking sealing or redaction in the first instance."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020566.jpg
Quote #2
"The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to address the New York Times Company's motion to unseal the filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020566.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,726 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page80 of 92
01/26/2022 | 585 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion for a new trial and accompanying exhibits, which she requests to file under seal. See Dkt. No. 580. The Court has also received requests from media organizations to unseal the motion. The Court is aware there is substantial public interest in this matter and will ensure that the First Amendment right to public access is fully safeguarded. At the same time, the Court must act deliberately and hear from the parties in considering these sealing issues in order to ensure the integrity of any potential inquiry process going forward, should one be ordered. That too is in the public, as well as the Defendant's and the Government's, interest. Accordingly, to the extent the Defense requests that arguments in favor of sealing should themselves be sealed, that request is DENIED. Arguments in favor of sealing can be made in such a way so as not to undermine the grounds for seeking sealing or redaction in the first instance. The Defense is therefore ORDERED to file a letter on the public docket on or before February 1, 2022, that justifies the proposed sealing by reference to the three-part test in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Government may file on ECF a response to the Defenses justification letter on or before February 4, 2022. The Government's opposition to the Defenses new trial motion is due February 2, 2022. Dkt. No. 571. Per the established practice in this case, the Government must provide a copy via email to the Defense to allow the Defense the opportunity to propose narrowly tailored redactions and/or sealing. If either party proposes redactions to or sealing of the Government's anticipated opposition, a letter justifying such redactions or sealing must be filed on the public docket. The Defense letter must be filed on or before February 8, 2022, and the Government letter must be filed by February 11, 2022. The same process will apply for any Defense reply in support, which is due February 9, 2022. Dkt. No. 571. If redactions or sealing are proposed, the Defense letter justifying such requests would be due February 15, 2022, and the Government letter would be due February 18, 2022. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to address the New York Times Company's motion to unseal the filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors. See Dkt. No. 583. Letters by both parties must be submitted via ECF on or before February 11, 2022. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/26/2022)(jw) (Entered: 01/26/2022)
01/26/2022 | 586 | LETTER addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Matthew A. Leish dated 1/26/2022 re: I write on behalf of Daily News, L.P. (jw) (Entered: 01/26/2022)
01/27/2022 | 587 | LETTER addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Nathan Siegel dated 1/26/2022 re: Letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan on behalf of American Broadcasting Companies, Inc and NBC Universal News Group (jw) (Entered: 01/27/2022)
01/28/2022 | 588 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated January 28, 2022 re: Redaction of Witness Name Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 01/28/2022)
01/28/2022 | 589 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated 1/28/22 re: Redaction (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 01/28/2022)
02/01/2022 | 590 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated 2/1/22 re: Sealing Motion for New Trial (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 02/01/2022)
02/01/2022 | 591 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated 2/1/22 re: Extension of Time (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 02/01/2022)
02/02/2022 | 592 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 591 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated 2/1/22 re: Extension of Time. ENDORSEMENT: The extension request is hereby GRANTED. The briefing schedule for other post-verdict motions is revised as follows: - Defense submission: February 11, 2022. Government response: February 25, 2022. Defense reply: March 11, 2022. (Motions due by 2/11/2022. Responses due by 2/25/2022. Replies due by 3/11/2022) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/2/2022) (ap) (Entered: 02/02/2022)
02/04/2022 | 593 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: As a post-trial house-keeping matter, attached to this Order are the Court Exhibits. The parties have proposed redactions to several
DOJ-OGR-00020566

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document