Ex-partner ('my ex')
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Witness (Juror)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (Juror)
|
Friend |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A 'difficult encounter' involving S&M where boundaries were pushed ('hit a landmine'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A multi-day discussion resolving the conflict where both parties listened to each other. | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020910.jpg
This document is a transcript page (p. 84 of 221) dated February 28, 2023, related to Case 22-1426 (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell appeal). It captures a 'voir dire' or post-trial hearing where a witness (implied to be a juror) is being questioned by a judge ('Your Honor') about their attention span during jury selection, potential distractions regarding an 'ex,' and their decision to give press interviews about being a sexual abuse victim. The witness defends their accuracy in answering questionnaires and explains they did not believe their interview would garner significant news attention or alert their family to their abuse history.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018654.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a personal essay or manuscript discussing the emotional dynamics of BDSM relationships, specifically focusing on handling boundary violations ('landmines') and the importance of communication and trust. The author reflects on a past relationship where a partner accidentally pushed too hard, contrasting his constructive response with abusive tactics like minimizing or blaming. The text also references feminist anti-abuse models and the concept of 'aftercare' in BDSM practices. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation file.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity