David Perry QC
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lord Justice Scott Baker
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Anand Doobay
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-17 | N/A | Date the legal opinion was signed by David Perry QC | London (implied by 6KBW add... | View |
| 2011-09-30 | Report presentation | A 488-page report on the independent review of extradition arrangements was presented to the Home... | United Kingdom | View |
| 2011-01-01 | Independent review | A year-long independent review of the United Kingdom's extradition arrangements was conducted. | United Kingdom | View |
EFTA00011192.pdf
This document is a legal opinion provided by David Perry QC regarding the extradition law of England and Wales in the context of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the United States. It outlines the extradition process between the UK and US, potential bars to extradition, human rights considerations, and the implications of Ms. Maxwell waiving her right to extradition. The document concludes that if Ms. Maxwell were to abscond to the UK, it is highly unlikely she would be granted bail or successfully resist extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00001208.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal opinion written by David Perry QC of 6KBW College Hill, dated December 17, 2020. It analyzes UK extradition law, specifically concluding that no bars to extradition (such as asylum or national security) apply to Ms. Maxwell. It also discusses the rarity of the Secretary of State refusing extradition (citing the Gary McKinnon case) and notes that contested extradition cases typically conclude within two years.
DOJ-OGR-00002229(1).jpg
This legal document, dated December 17, 2020, and authored by David Perry QC, analyzes the legal framework for extradition from the United Kingdom to the United States, specifically concerning Ms Maxwell. It argues that none of the statutory bars to extradition apply to her case and highlights the rarity of the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition, citing the past case of Gary McKinnon as an example that is no longer applicable. The document notes that the purpose of the Extradition Act 2003 is to streamline and facilitate extradition, with most cases concluding within two years.
DOJ-OGR-00002114.jpg
This document is the Curriculum Vitae of David Perry QC, a prominent UK barrister specializing in extradition law. It outlines his extensive career, including roles as Treasury Counsel and a judge, and highlights his expertise in extradition matters. A key event detailed is his co-authorship of a major 2011 independent review for the UK Home Office on the nation's extradition arrangements, which concluded that the 2003 UK-US treaty was fair and did not need renegotiation.
DOJ-OGR-00002110.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated October 8, 2020. It discusses the legal implications of a person waiving their right to extradition, noting that if consent is given, the process is likely to take one to three months. The page is signed by David Perry QC of 6KBW College Hill.
DOJ-OGR-00020126.jpg
This legal document, dated December 17, 2020, analyzes the extradition case of Ms. Maxwell from the United Kingdom to the United States. It argues that legal bars to extradition are unlikely to apply to her case, highlighting that the UK Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition is exceptionally rare and that the 2003 Extradition Act is designed to facilitate, not hinder, such proceedings.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity