| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR Epstein
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
President Bill Clinton
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
MR Epstein
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR EPStein
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
MR EPStein
|
Patron benefactor |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Owner/Resident of property
|
Friend |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Facilitator |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Brittny
|
Scheduling coordinating |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR EPStein
|
Communicated |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Government of the United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
extradition judge
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Secretary of State
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
hellen
|
Communicated via phone message |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Perry QC
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Received messages at same location system |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Communicated with |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sara
|
Indirectly connected |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Staff (unnamed)
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR Epstein
|
Co principals |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Perry QC
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR Epstein
|
Co habitants |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Potential flight from justice | A hypothetical scenario where Ms. Maxwell would have fled from the USA to France in violation of ... | USA to France | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms Maxwell absconding from the United States and contesting extradition. | United States / United Kingdom | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Extradition proceedings for Ms Maxwell requested by the Government of the United States. | United Kingdom | View |
| N/A | N/A | A redacted individual was directed to meet Prince Andrew, who then 'groped both girls'. | Mr Epstein's New York house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein traveled with a redacted individual to stage an orgy for Prince Andre... | Little St James | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls. | Mr Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell piloted President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner. | Little St James | View |
| N/A | Residency | A set of daily duties are outlined for when Mr Epstein, Ms Maxwell, and guests are staying at the... | A residence | View |
| N/A | Trial | A potential trial in the United States for Ms. Maxwell, which is argued to be in the best interes... | United States | View |
| N/A | Residency | Mr Epstein, Ms Maxwell and their guests are in residence, requiring staff to follow specific clot... | Estate | View |
| N/A | Service | Dinner service, for which staff are required to wear long sleeve white shirts. | Estate | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Extradition proceedings concerning Ms Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Extradition proceedings requested by the Government of the United States for Ms Maxwell. | United Kingdom | View |
| N/A | Flight from justice | Ms Maxwell absconded from the United States. | United States | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Analysis of the legal arguments and bars to the extradition of Ms Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Bail hearing | A bail hearing for Ms. Maxwell where one victim made a statement in person and another provided a... | Court | View |
| 2020-07-07 | N/A | Superseding Indictment | United States | View |
| 2005-02-14 | Household task | A checklist of tasks to be completed for the preparation of Ms. Maxwell's bathroom. | Ms Maxwell's Bathroom | View |
| 2005-02-14 | Daily routine | Mr Epstein, Ms Maxwell, and guests are expected to come downstairs, at which point breakfast is t... | A residence | View |
| 2005-01-13 | Phone call | Murray Gellmann called J.E. to request a conversation with either J.E. or Ms Maxwell. | P.B. | View |
| 2004-07-17 | Phone call | Ms Maxwell & Warren called Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2004-04-23 | N/A | A person named 'hellen' from the 'Office' called Ms. Maxwell at 5:25 AM and requested a call back. | N/A | View |
| 2004-04-23 | N/A | An unknown person telephoned Ms. Maxwell at 5:37 AM. | N/A | View |
| 2003-01-24 | Phone call | Ms Maxwell called for GM, and Michael took the message. | N/A | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | Ms. Maxwell introduced a redacted individual to Prince Andrew. | Ms Maxwell's London house | View |
This document is the final page of a legal opinion written by David Perry QC of 6KBW College Hill, dated December 17, 2020. It analyzes UK extradition law, specifically concluding that no bars to extradition (such as asylum or national security) apply to Ms. Maxwell. It also discusses the rarity of the Secretary of State refusing extradition (citing the Gary McKinnon case) and notes that contested extradition cases typically conclude within two years.
This legal document analyzes the potential bars to the extradition of Ms. Maxwell from the UK to the US. It argues that bars related to oppression or human rights (Article 8 of the ECHR) are unlikely to be available to her, especially given that she absconded from the United States. The document also clarifies that the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition under the Extradition Act 2003 is not discretionary but is limited to specific statutory grounds.
This document is page 57 of a staff manual dated February 14, 2005, outlining emergency procedures for Fire and Hurricane Season. It explicitly instructs staff that their priority is to protect 'Mr Epstein, Ms Maxwell, their guests, other staff members and yourself,' linking Epstein and Maxwell as the heads of the household. The document provides standard safety protocols for fires (calling 911, evacuation) and hurricane preparation (monitoring weather, securing furniture).
This document outlines detailed breakfast serving protocols, including specific preferences for Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. It lists their individual food and drink choices, such as coffee, water, and specific brands like Sweet and Low or Maxwell House. Additionally, it provides general instructions for serving guests, covering aspects like setting tables, inquiring about preferences, checking for allergies, serving etiquette, and cleanup.
A household shopping list dated March 3, 2005, detailing specific grocery items including meats, beverages, cereals, and cheeses. The document specifically mentions 'Ms Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell) and 'David' as individuals who will provide further instructions on purchasing meat and fish. It includes a section for items specifically from 'Carmine Giardini's Market', indicating the location is likely in the Palm Beach area.
This document is a housekeeping checklist dated February 14, 2005, outlining cleaning and restocking tasks for two separate bathrooms: the 'Master Bathroom' and 'Ms Maxwell's Bathroom'. The instructions for the Master Bathroom include a specific preparation of towels for a massage.
This document is a checklist of household chores dated February 14, 2005. It outlines tasks for various areas of a residence, including the kitchen, downstairs areas, and master bedroom. The list includes a specific instruction to make breakfast once "Mr Epstein, Ms Maxwell and guests come downstairs."
This document is a household checklist dated February 14, 2005, specifically inventorying toiletries required for 'Ms Maxwell's Bathroom.' It lists numerous specific luxury and commercial brands for skincare and hygiene products.
This document is a checklist dated February 14, 2005, providing detailed instructions for preparing 'Ms Maxwell's bathroom'. The list includes specific requirements for placing towels, toiletries, checking water, and even placing photographs, suggesting a meticulously managed household with specific personal preferences for staff to follow.
This document, dated February 14, 2005, provides security directives for staff concerning Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. It instructs staff to maintain strict confidentiality regarding their activities and whereabouts, handle callers by taking messages without disclosing information, and report any strange calls or unusual behavior to Ms. Maxwell. The document emphasizes that the security of the house, Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and their guests is the paramount concern.
This document, dated February 14, 2005, is an instructional memo for staff at the residence of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. It details strict procedures for answering the telephone, including specific scripts for greetings, screening calls, and taking messages. The instructions emphasize professionalism and outline specific locations for leaving messages and placing items like directories and reading glasses, indicating a highly structured household environment.
This document, dated February 14, 2005, is an instructional memo for staff detailing the strict protocol for interacting with 'Mr Epstein' and 'Ms Maxwell'. It provides exact phrases to be used when entering a room, greeting them, and offering service, while explicitly forbidding any unsolicited conversation on topics like the weather.
This document, dated February 14, 2005, is a guide on 'Proper Language' for staff, instructing them on formal etiquette and specific phrases to use and avoid when speaking to Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and their guests. It emphasizes politeness, deference, and taking immediate responsibility for mistakes, outlining a strict communication protocol within the household or organization.
This document, dated February 14, 2005, is a set of grooming and guest relations instructions for household staff serving Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. It outlines strict rules regarding appearance, behavior, and communication, emphasizing the importance of being unobtrusive and maintaining absolute discretion. A key directive is for staff to "see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing," and to channel all questions through an Estate Manager, highlighting a highly controlled and secretive environment.
This document is the introduction page from a staff manual, dated February 14, 2005. It outlines the manual's purpose: to guide staff in performing their duties to a high standard, specifically by anticipating the needs of Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and their guests within a home.
This document is a table of contents for a household or staff manual, dated February 14, 2005. It outlines procedures for guest relations, pre-arrival preparations, and daily duties to be performed while 'Mr Epstein, Ms Maxwell, and guests are in residence'. The detailed breakdown of tasks and specific areas of the property, including a separate bathroom for Ms. Maxwell, suggests a highly organized and staffed private residence.
This legal document, dated December 17, 2020, and authored by David Perry QC, analyzes the legal framework for extradition from the United Kingdom to the United States, specifically concerning Ms Maxwell. It argues that none of the statutory bars to extradition apply to her case and highlights the rarity of the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition, citing the past case of Gary McKinnon as an example that is no longer applicable. The document notes that the purpose of the Extradition Act 2003 is to streamline and facilitate extradition, with most cases concluding within two years.
This document is a page from a legal filing (Exhibit 103-2) dated December 23, 2020, analyzing UK extradition law in relation to Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that if Maxwell were to flee the US to the UK, she would likely be denied bail and her arguments against extradition (oppression, human rights) would fail due to 'bad faith' and the serious nature of the charges. It also clarifies the limited powers of the UK Secretary of State to refuse extradition under the Extradition Act 2003.
This legal document, page 3 of a court filing from December 23, 2020, argues against the availability of certain bars to the extradition of Ms. Maxwell. It posits that a finding of oppression is unlikely given she absconded from the United States, and that human rights claims under the ECHR are also improbable. The document further clarifies that the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition is strictly limited by the Extradition Act 2003 and is not a matter of general discretion.
This legal document, authored by French attorney William Julié, provides an analysis of the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from the USA to France. Julié argues that despite her French citizenship, French authorities would likely grant an extradition request because the US-France extradition treaty does not prohibit extraditing nationals. He further states that factors like her US citizenship, a signed waiver, and the obligation for France to try her if extradition is denied, make her return to the USA highly probable, especially in a scenario where she had fled in violation of bail.
This document is an annex from a legal filing, dated August 12, 2020, containing instructions from the law firm Peters and Peters to an unnamed Counsel. The instructions outline five specific questions for an expert opinion on the extradition arrangements between the United Kingdom and the United States, focusing on procedures, bail, and potential legal and human rights-based challenges to extradition that could be relevant to Ms. Maxwell.
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, analyzing the legal viability of Ghislaine Maxwell resisting extradition from the UK to the US. It specifically argues that she would fail to invoke Article 6 (fair trial) or Article 8 (private and family life) of the ECHR to stop extradition. The conclusion begins to state that if she absconded to the UK in breach of US bail, she would likely be denied bail there.
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, argues for the extradition of Ms. Maxwell to the United States. It contends that a U.S. trial would best serve the interests of the victims and that it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could successfully oppose extradition on the grounds of her physical or mental health, as the legal threshold for such an argument is exceptionally high.
This page is part of a legal filing (Document 97-21) filed on December 14, 2020, analyzing the likelihood of Ghislaine Maxwell successfully contesting extradition under UK law. The text argues that Maxwell cannot rely on 'passage of time' or 'forum' bars to prevent extradition, citing that while some conduct occurred in London, the majority of harm occurred in the US. It heavily references the Extradition Act 2003 and various legal precedents (Tollman, Gomes, Kakis).
This document consists of three phone message slips for a person identified as 'J.E.', primarily dated January 13, 2005. The messages are from Courtney Wild, who requests a callback, and Murray Gellmann, who states he is in 'P.B.' and wishes to speak with either J.E. or a 'Ms Maxwell'. A third, undated message slip records a call from a 'V. Huecki' with no message left.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | MR EPStein | Ms Maxwell | $0.00 | Purchase of a helicopter, homes in New York and... | View |
| N/A | Received | MR EPStein | Ms Maxwell | $0.00 | Purchase of a helicopter, homes in New York and... | View |
| N/A | Received | MR EPStein | Ms Maxwell | $0.00 | Purchase of a helicopter, homes in New York and... | View |
(917) 520-3106, (212) 879-9366
Staff are instructed to advise Ms Maxwell of any unusual behavior, such as strangers lurking around the property.
Staff are instructed to advise Ms Maxwell of any strange telephone calls or enquiries.
(917) 520-3106, (212) 879-9366
(917) 520-3106, (212) 879-9366
A message for Mr. Epstein from Ms. Maxwell. The message is 'TELL HIM TO CALL ME'. The recipient is asked to 'PLEASE CALL'. The message was taken by 'Ru'.
A message slip for 'ms maxwell' was recorded at 5:37 AM. The slip indicates that someone 'TELEPHONED'. The caller's name is not clearly written.
A message slip for 'Ms Maxwell' from 'hellen' at the 'Office' was recorded at 5:25 AM. The slip is marked 'PLEASE CALL'.
At 18:42 on 24/01/03, Ms Maxwell called for GM, leaving a message to 'CALL YOUR MOTHER'. The message was taken by Michael.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity