| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Trip | Kate went to Maxwell's house for tea. | Maxwell's house | View |
| N/A | Abuse and manipulation | Epstein and Maxwell manipulated the author using her dream of attending FIT, controlled her diet,... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Indictment | An indictment was filed against Maxwell containing eight counts, six of which proceeded to trial.... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | Flight logs placed Jane on at least one flight with Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The jury acquitted Maxwell on count two of the charges against her. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial where Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie are testifying against Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal ruling | Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request for temporary release after analyzing her arguments and pro... | The District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Horrifying sexual abuse | The room | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Maxwell's motion for a new trial was denied by the District Court following a special evidentiary... | District Court | View |
| N/A | Travel | Juan Alessi drove Jane, Maxwell, and Epstein to a plane and watched them board together. | An airport/airfield | View |
| N/A | Grand jury proceedings | Grand jury testimony was offered in connection with charges proposed against Epstein and Maxwell.... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | Maxwell's trial, during which certain aspects and subject matters of the grand jury transcripts b... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Maxwell's trial, where a jury's potential bias due to disclosure of civil case material is discus... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | The District Court's sentencing of Maxwell, which is being reviewed and upheld in this document. ... | District Court | View |
| N/A | Trial | The criminal trial of the defendant, Maxwell, which concluded prior to the events described in th... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal motion | Defendant Maxwell moved for a new trial, contending the juror's presence violated her Sixth Amend... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | A witness traveled to New Mexico, a trip which is the subject of the court's discussion. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal ruling | Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request for bail after considering multiple written submissions. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A Rule 33 motion was made based on a juror's alleged erroneous response during voir dire. | District Court | View |
| N/A | Court ruling | Judge Nathan issued a written order finding Maxwell poses a flight risk and that temporary releas... | District Court | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and exploitation | Epstein and Maxwell recruited Carolyn to engage in sex acts with Epstein at the Palm Beach Reside... | Palm Beach Residence | View |
| N/A | Trip | Maxwell and Epstein invited Carolyn, then under 17, to travel from Florida to a place outside of ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | Epstein and Maxwell encouraged and enticed Carolyn to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex a... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Argument presented that Ms. Maxwell has standing to enforce a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) as ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | Trip | Annie was taken to New Mexico by Maxwell and Epstein under the false pretense of a scholarship tr... | New Mexico | View |
This document is an email chain from June 2022 between an FBI Special Agent (Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the SDNY. The AUSA is gathering personal information (DOB, SSN, GS scale) to nominate the 'Epstein / Maxwell case' team, including the FBI agent, for a DOJ Director's Award for Superior Performance, citing the agent's 'extensive efforts with victims.' The emails note that sentencing has been completed and the team is seeking 'closure' by submitting the award nomination.
An internal FBI email chain dated June 27, 2022, from a Victim Specialist in the New York field office. The subject is 'Maxwell,' and the content discusses logistics for 'tomorrow' involving getting someone on a list and helping them 'get in.' Given the date, this almost certainly refers to preparations for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing on June 28, 2022.
An email chain from October 2021 between unidentified individuals (likely legal or investigative staff) discussing the retrieval of 'tipline/hotline' tracking spreadsheets for Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The requester seeks updated files from the FBI for '3500' production (referring to the Jencks Act, requiring prosecutors to provide witness statements to the defense), and the responder attaches two Excel files: HOTLINE_TRACKER.xlsx and MAXWELL_HOTLINE_TRACKER.xlsx.
This document is a heavily redacted email chain from August 11, 2021, containing a forwarded voice message file (.wav). The correspondence involves unknown parties forwarding a voice message from an unavailable source. The middle email contains the critical context 'Re Maxwell,' indicating the voice message pertains to Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender notes they are forwarding the message 'per our standard practice,' suggesting an official or legal procedure. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00038714.
An email chain from June 2021 between investigators discussing financial records for the 'Financial Trust Company' held at J.P. Morgan (account ending in 5001). The correspondence specifically requests account statements surrounding a transfer to 'Maxwell' on October 19, 1999, seeking to identify the source of funds for that transfer. The chain also references a J.P. Morgan Entity Resolution form (bates # 1934) and KYC (Know Your Customer) documents.
An electronic calendar entry titled 'Maxwell Juror Questionnaire Administration' scheduled for November 4-6, 2021, at '40 Foley Courthouse'. The document, created in August 2021, relates to the jury selection process for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The identities of the organizer and attendees are completely redacted.
This document is an isolated email header dated August 27, 2021. The subject line '[EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Maxwell Juror Questionnaire Administration' suggests it relates to legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically the jury selection process. The sender and recipient identities are fully redacted.
This document is an internal FBI email chain dated June 27, 2022, between a Victim Specialist and a Special Agent in the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit of the New York Field Office. The subject is 'Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The correspondence discusses logistics for the following day (likely Maxwell's sentencing on June 28, 2022), specifically regarding an unnamed female individual who needs assistance getting into the event or checking if she is on a specific list.
This document is a digital calendar entry for a 'Maxwell team call' scheduled for April 26, 2021. The event is classified as personal and includes dial-in details, though the organizer, specific dial-in information, and attendee list have been redacted. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00038601, suggesting it is part of legal discovery related to the Epstein/Maxwell case.
This document is an email header dated April 23, 2021. The sender and recipients are fully redacted. The subject line is '[EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Maxwell team call', suggesting a coordination or conference call regarding the 'Maxwell team', likely in the context of Ghislaine Maxwell's legal proceedings given the date. The document includes a Bates stamp EFTA00038600.
This document is an email notification dated March 30, 2021, indicating the acceptance of a meeting or task with the subject 'Review Maxwell Physical Evidence'. The sender and recipient are redacted. The document appears to be part of legal discovery or investigative files related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case, referenced by the Bates stamp EFTA00038583.
This document is an internal FBI email thread from July 2020 discussing the Epstein/Maxwell case. Agents discuss staffing needs for the 'discovery' phase of the investigation, with one agent confirming they previously assisted on the case while in the 'Applicants' unit. The thread also discusses the limitations of JTTF flight-tracking tools, noting they are primarily for international flights while the subjects of interest are flying domestic.
This document is an internal FBI email chain from July 2020 regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Agents discuss staffing needs for 'discovery prep' for the Maxwell case, with one agent offering assistance based on their prior experience cataloging Epstein evidence from Miami in 2019. The emails also discuss the limitations of JTTF flight-tracking tools for domestic flights and strategies to establish 'airport tripwires' and training for airport staff to detect human trafficking at JFK.
This document is an email thread from December 2019 discussing 'GM Facebook logins,' referring to Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence involves a request for addresses (likely IP addresses, typed as 'up addresses') and notes that Maxwell's ISP usage for Facebook occurred on November 13 and 14.
This document is an email chain dated between November 8, 2019, and December 31, 2019, involving law enforcement or legal personnel discussing T-Mobile subscriber records. The most significant finding is the confirmation that a specific phone number is registered to 'Maxwell's organization,' which the sender notes is 'encouraging' for their case, presumably against Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender also notes they have sent an application to the court regarding this matter.
This document is an email chain from November 2019 between a detective on the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The detective reports that analysis of a 'pen trap' on Ghislaine Maxwell's cell phone revealed IP addresses and phone numbers linked to Facebook accounts. The correspondence tracks the request for and issuance of a subpoena and Non-Disclosure Order (NDO) to obtain subscriber and login information from Facebook for the identified numbers.
An internal law enforcement email dated October 30, 2019, providing an update on the surveillance of Ghislaine Maxwell. The email notes that a subpoena was issued for her phone records, a Pen Register Trap and Trace (PRTT) went active on October 29, and her IP address was located in Pawtucket, Rhode Island on that same day.
This document is a two-page inventory log dated November 20, 2020, listing digital storage devices (hard drives, discs, thumb drives) related to the 'Maxwell Review' from the SDNY. It catalogues items by drive identifier, lists the device serial numbers contained within (mostly starting with NYCO/NYC0), classifies them as 'Original' or 'Responsive', and includes notes where some passwords and labels have been redacted.
This document is a digital calendar entry from October 8, 2019, recording a scheduled meeting ('mtg') with 'Maxwell attorneys' (likely referring to Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team). The meeting was scheduled for two hours in 'conf room 638' and is classified as 'X-PERSONAL'. The attendee's name is redacted, and the document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00038232.
This document is an email notification dated October 8, 2019, confirming the acceptance of a meeting invitation. The subject of the meeting is listed as 'mtg w/ Maxwell attorneys', likely referring to legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and recipient of the email are redacted.
This document is a digital calendar entry for a meeting scheduled on October 8, 2019, titled 'mtg w/ Maxwell attorneys'. The meeting was set for two hours in 'conf room 638' and classified as 'X-PERSONAL'. The identities of the organizer and attendees are redacted, though one attendee entry appears to begin with the letter 'Y'. The document creates a record of legal coordination occurring post-Epstein's death (August 2019).
This document is an electronic calendar entry for a meeting titled 'mtg w/ Maxwell attorneys' scheduled for October 8, 2019, from 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM. The meeting location is listed as 'conf room 638' and is classified as 'X-PERSONAL'. The names of the organizer and attendees have been redacted.
An email chain from August 19, 2020, between legal or investigative team members coordinating the production of discovery documents for the 'Maxwell' case. The discussion focuses on technical difficulties accessing encrypted American Express ('Amex') financial returns from January 24, 2020, specifically '.vsf' files requiring a password. One party inquires about the password, and the respondent indicates they must check with a third party who is in possession of 'all financials'.
This document is an internal FBI email thread from November 2020 discussing the logistics of a 'Discovery laptop' and hard drive. The emails coordinate a meeting where the defense team (presumably for Ghislaine Maxwell, referred to as 'Maxwell') is scheduled to review materials from 10am-3p. The agents discuss dress code for the meeting and the handover of the laptop from an analyst.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Maxwell would call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly in the first year or two.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of a response from the District Court, claiming it resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity