Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Court/Government

Person
Mentions
0
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
0
Also known as:
The Court/Government
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.
No documents found for this entity.
Total Received
$59,717,205.00
28 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$59,717,205.00
28 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Morris Court/Government $10,000.00 Fine handed to Morris after his arrest for the ... View
N/A Received MAXWELL Court/Government $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
N/A Received MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court/Government $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
N/A Received defendant (implied) Court/Government $200,000.00 Potential fine range discussed: '20 to 200,000 ... View
N/A Received defendant Court/Government $750,000.00 Proposed fine which is the maximum allowed by law View
N/A Received defendant Court/Government $5,000,000.00 Statutory maximum fine mentioned by the Court. View
N/A Received defendant Court/Government $100.00 Special assessment fee mentioned by the Court. View
2023-06-29 Received Ms. Maxwell Court/Government $0.00 Discussion regarding a court-imposed fine and M... View
2023-02-28 Received the defendant Court/Government $750,000.00 Fine imposed as part of sentencing View
2022-07-08 Received the defendant Court/Government $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed during sentencing View
2022-07-08 Received the defendant Court/Government $750,000.00 Fine imposed as part of sentencing. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court/Government $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court/Government $300.00 Mandatory special assessment View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Fine ordered by Judge Nathan during sentencing. View
2022-06-29 Received MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court/Government $300.00 Court Assessment fee View
2020-12-30 Received the defendant Court/Government $500,000.00 Cash proposed to secure bail. View
2020-12-30 Received the defendant Court/Government $8,000,000.00 Property value proposed to secure bail. View
2020-12-14 Received Unnamed surety Court/Government $1,500,000.00 Value of property posted by a surety, described... View
2020-12-14 Received Ms. Maxwell and S... Court/Government $22,500,000.00 Proposed bond amount representing all current a... View
2020-12-14 Received Spouse Court/Government $8,000,000.00 Approximate value of three properties owned by ... View
As Sender
3
As Recipient
29
Total
32

Objection/Surprise

From: defendant
To: Court/Government

Referenced by Mr. Rohrbach as receiving the defendant's letter with surprise.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Ltr.

From: defense
To: Court/Government

Cited as 'Def. Ltr.' (Defense Letter) pages 1, 3, and 4, containing arguments regarding material relevance.

Legal correspondence
N/A
Communication Source

Government Exhibit 295

From: DETECTIVE RECAREY
To: Court/Government

Affidavit regarding seized evidence.

Affidavit
N/A
Communication Source

Response to Government's objection

From: defendant
To: Court/Government

The Defendant responds that the proposed questions are designed to identify jurors whose personal training or experience might cause them to disregard trial evidence or be biased in favor of the Government.

Legal response
N/A
Communication Source

Response to Government's objection regarding 'Media Issue...

From: defendant
To: Court/Government

The Defendant argues that detailed questioning about media exposure is critical in a high-profile case to ascertain juror bias, citing legal precedents like United States v. Tsarnaev to support the need to identify what content jurors have seen and what they believe they know.

Legal response
N/A
Communication Source

Mail delivery protocols

From: Defense counsel
To: Court/Government

Referenced as 'defense's letter' requesting 1-day delivery turnaround.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Plan to highlight portions of documents

From: Defense counsel
To: Court/Government

Previewed plan to highlight documents or flag portions on screen

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Witness COVID Status

From: defense (implied)
To: Court/Government

Letter confirming the witness has the virus (The Court asks: 'I thought the letter said that you've got that.')

Letter
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Witness testimony disclosure

From: defendant
To: Court/Government

Disclosure of anticipated witness testimony

Notice
2021-11-01
Communication Source

Response regarding Motions in Limine and Defense Strategy

From: Defense counsel
To: Court/Government

Legal argument regarding burden of proof and admissibility of past civil litigation outcomes.

Court filing
2021-10-29
Communication Source

Opposition Brief

From: defense
To: Court/Government

Defense stated need to investigate Minor Victim-6 as a potential witness (Referenced as 'Def. Opp. at 20').

Legal brief
2021-10-29
Communication Source

Response to Objection

From: defendant
To: Court/Government

Defense argues live questioning allows observation of juror reactions/hesitations.

Legal filing response
2021-10-22
Communication Source

Thirteen motions in limine

From: the defendant
To: Court/Government

Defense filed motions to exclude certain evidence, which this document opposes.

Legal filing
2021-10-18
Communication Source

Reply letter disputing MDC explanation

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Court/Government

Disputing enhanced security schedule explanation and raising concerns about conditions.

Letter
2021-05-07
Communication Source

Conditions of confinement

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: Court/Government

Complaint regarding sanitation, water, visiting conditions, and health of Ms. Maxwell

Legal filing
2021-04-07
Communication Source

Financial Documents

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: Court/Government

Financial documents vetted by accounting firm providing details on assets.

Submission
2021-03-22
Communication Source

Unknown (Referenced in text)

From: Defense counsel
To: Court/Government

Defense letter containing proposed redactions.

Letter
2020-11-30
Communication Source

Unknown (Referenced in text)

From: Defense counsel
To: Court/Government

Defense letter containing proposed redactions.

Letter
2020-11-25
Communication Source

Defense Letter (Def. Ltr. 6-7)

From: defense
To: Court/Government

Complaints about issues within the MDC.

Letter
2020-10-30
Communication Source

Defense Letter

From: Defense counsel
To: Court/Government

Accusations regarding discovery deadlines and MDC conditions (referenced in text).

Letter
2020-10-23
Communication Source

Discovery Protocols

From: Court/Government
To: Defense counsel

Protocol defining 'Confidential Information' and the process for Defense Counsel to challenge such designations.

Legal filing
2020-08-28
Communication Source

Conditions of incarceration

From: Defense counsel
To: Court/Government

Referred to as 'Defense Letter' in Footnote 4, raising objections to conditions.

Letter
2020-08-13
Communication Source

Defense Letter

From: Defense counsel
To: Court/Government

Requesting witness disclosure and intervention in BOP protocols.

Letter
2020-08-10
Communication Source

Protective Order regarding Discovery

From: Court/Government
To: Unknown (likely Epstei...

Rules regarding the dissemination of victim/witness identities found in discovery materials.

Court filing
2020-07-30
Communication Source

Protective Order Protocol

From: Court/Government
To: Defense counsel

Protocol defining Highly Confidential Information and usage restrictions.

Court filing
2020-07-28
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search