Pennsylvania
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00004837.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), but the content describes the legal precedent of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*. It details former DA Bruce Castor's testimony regarding his decision not to prosecute Bill Cosby in 2005 to facilitate a civil suit, asserting he did not grant permanent immunity. It includes testimony from Andrea Constand's attorneys stating they were unaware of any non-prosecution agreement at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00004833.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a court filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), but the text specifically details the 2005 investigation into Bill Cosby regarding Ms. Constand. It summarizes Prosecutor Bruce Castor's rationale for declining to prosecute Cosby at that time, citing insufficient evidence, credibility issues with the accuser, and the existence of phone records and wire interceptions. The document is likely included in the Maxwell docket as a legal exhibit or precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00004825.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) containing a historical press release or statement by District Attorney Castor regarding the investigation into Bill Cosby. The text details the chain of custody for the complaint (Canada to Philadelphia to Cheltenham), the cooperation of all parties, and the subsequent investigation including a search of Cosby's home. Ultimately, DA Castor announces the decision to decline criminal charges due to insufficient admissible evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while noting that a civil action remains possible.
DOJ-OGR-00004824.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), appearing to cite the precedent of the Bill Cosby case (Commonwealth v. Cosby). The text details former D.A. Bruce Castor's legal strategy to issue a non-prosecution statement for Bill Cosby specifically to prevent him from invoking the Fifth Amendment in a civil suit filed by Andrea Constand. It includes the text of a press release announcing the conclusion of the investigation into the January 2004 allegations.
DOJ-OGR-00004814.jpg
This document is a page from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion (Commonwealth v. Cosby) written by Justice Wecht, decided on June 30, 2021. While the text concerns the prosecution of Bill Cosby and District Attorney Bruce Castor's 2005 decision not to prosecute due to lack of evidence, the header indicates this document was filed as an exhibit (Document 310-1) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which is the federal criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Cosby case was likely cited in the Maxwell proceedings as a legal precedent regarding the validity of non-prosecution agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00004811.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated July 2, 2021. The defense argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's indictment should be dismissed by citing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision to vacate Bill Cosby's conviction due to a violation of a non-prosecution promise. The defense asserts that the government is similarly reneging on a formal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Maxwell from over 25 years prior, violating fundamental fairness and due process.
DOJ-OGR-00020063.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing entitled 'Table of Authorities' from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 18, 2020. It lists numerous legal precedents cited in the filing, primarily 'United States v. [Defendant]' cases. Notably, the list includes two citations for 'United States v. Epstein' (one from 2001 in E.D. Pa. and one from 2019 in S.D.N.Y.) and one for 'United States v. Madoff'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019843.jpg
This document is the colophon (A Note on the Type) from page 355 of a book. The filename (Epst_9780451494566) and ISBN correspond to James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The text details the history of the typeface 'Aldus' by Hermann Zapf and lists production credits for North Market Street Graphics and Berryville Graphics. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019636.jpg
This document appears to be page 148 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the ISBN in the footer), included in a House Oversight Committee production. The text discusses the blurred lines between whistle-blowers and spies, citing historical examples such as Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, the 1971 FBI office burglary in Media, PA, and Philip Agee's defection to the KGB. It concludes by introducing the Edward Snowden case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019505.jpg
This document is page 17 from a book proof (likely by author Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename) regarding Edward Snowden, marked with a House Oversight Bates number. It details Snowden's early adulthood, including his physical fitness regimen, online persona, desire to move to Japan, and his brief, failed 19-week stint in the U.S. Army Reserves (Special Forces training) in 2004. It also mentions his grandfather, Admiral Barrett, who was at the Pentagon during the 9/11 attacks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031485.jpg
This document, stamped with a House Oversight Committee identifier, appears to be a news report or press summary regarding the diplomatic tension between the U.S. and Turkey over the extradition of Fethullah Gulen following the 2016 coup attempt. It details a press conference held by Steptoe & Johnson LLP attorneys Reid Weingarten and Michael Miller, who dismissed allegations that Gulen would flee the country and criticized the evidence provided by the Turkish government in previous legal attempts. The text discusses the strategic importance of the Incirlik Air Base and the casualties of the coup attempt.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031484.jpg
This document is an email dated August 5, 2016, from Will Bohlen to a group of recipients including high-profile attorneys Reid Weingarten and Jason Weinstein. The email shares a Reuters article reporting that Fethullah Gulen's lawyers fear for his life amid extradition demands from Turkey following the July 2016 coup attempt. While the document content is strictly about Gulen, it is likely part of an Epstein-related document dump because recipient Reid Weingarten was one of Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031483.jpg
This document is an email from a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031483) circulating a BBC news article regarding the aftermath of the July 15, 2016, failed coup in Turkey. The email includes high-profile legal and political recipients, including Reid Weingarten, who is identified in the article as a lawyer for Fethullah Gulen. The article details Gulen's fear of assassination, the Turkish government's demand for his extradition from Pennsylvania, and the subsequent political purge in Turkey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031480.jpg
An email chain from August 5, 2016, involving attorney Reid Weingarten and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com). The thread originates with Will Bohlen circulating a Wall Street Journal article about Turkish cleric Fethullah Gulen and the failed coup in Turkey to a group including Weingarten and Gulen associates. Weingarten forwarded this to Epstein, who replied 'funny can you speak'. Weingarten responded with 'High' importance, though the content of his final reply is redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031476.jpg
This document is a news article, produced as part of House Oversight records (Bates stamp 031476), reporting on statements made by Fethullah Gulen's lawyers regarding fears for his safety and his refusal to flee the U.S. amidst extradition demands from Turkey. The article details the tension between the U.S. and Turkey following the failed July 15 coup attempt, for which Turkish President Erdogan blames Gulen. Attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP is quoted defending Gulen.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031475.jpg
This document is an email dated August 5, 2016, from Will Bohlen to a large group including Michael Keough and attorney Reid Weingarten. The email forwards the text of a Reuters article reporting on a press conference held by Fethullah Gulen's lawyers (including Weingarten) in Washington, where they argued against his extradition to Turkey following a coup attempt. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031472.jpg
An email chain from August 5, 2016, where Reid Weingarten forwards a Wall Street Journal article to Jeffrey Epstein with 'High' importance. The underlying email from Will Bohlen was sent to a large group of recipients (likely a legal or PR team) and contains the full text of an article titled 'Lawyers for Imam Wanted by Turkish Authorities Fear for Their Client’s Life,' detailing the conflict between Turkish President Erdogan and Fethullah Gulen following the July 2016 coup attempt. The document originates from House Oversight Committee records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016550.jpg
This document is page 41 of a 42-page legal text, specifically from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), containing footnotes 226 through 238. The text references various legal studies, statutes, and articles concerning prosecutorial discretion, domestic violence laws, political influence on sentencing, and the independence of prosecutors in the US and abroad (Australia, Ireland, Canada). The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016537.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) discussing the systemic underenforcement of sexual assault laws in the United States and the failure of state criminal justice systems to adequately address the issue. It includes extensive footnotes citing legal precedents and state statutes regarding prosecutorial discretion and victim rights. The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016534.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016528.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It contains an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing 'Declination Oversight,' comparing U.S. and European approaches to prosecutorial discretion and private prosecution. The page includes extensive footnotes citing various state laws (RI, NH, NC, OK, PA) and legal scholarship regarding grand juries and selective prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016527.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing the oversight of declination decisions in state justice systems compared to the federal system. It highlights the lack of administrative and judicial review for state prosecutors' charging decisions and details the limited exceptions and historical context through extensive footnotes citing case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016522.jpg
This page from a law review article discusses the historical evolution of public versus private prosecution in the United States compared to England. It notes that while private prosecution has largely vanished in the U.S. in favor of public prosecutors, some states like Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire retain vestiges of it. The footnotes provide legal citations regarding victims' rights statutes and case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026596.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes (numbers 57-72) from a legal or tax analysis document produced for the House Oversight Committee. It cites various tax regulations (Reg 1.752, Reg 1.881), treatises on partnership taxation from 2009, and specific rulings regarding Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and Disregarded Entities (DREs). The content focuses on the technical tax treatment of pass-through entities across various US states.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026590.jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum analyzing tax laws concerning grantor trusts, conduit financing, and Disregarded Entities (DREs). It discusses discrepancies between federal tax law (IRS) and state laws (specifically Pennsylvania and New York) regarding the recognition of trusts as separate entities. It also details IRS regulations proposed in December 2008 regarding tax avoidance strategies using multiple-party financing transactions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity