| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Narrator
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Supreme Court creates new rule regarding 'reckless disregard' and vacates death penalty for Tison... | Washington D.C. / Arizona | View |
| N/A | N/A | Arizona trial court reimposes death sentence without evidentiary hearing. | Arizona | View |
This document appears to be a page from a legal memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, who argued *Tison v. Arizona*) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details the narrator's oral arguments before the Supreme Court on November 3, 1986, defending the Tison brothers against the death penalty by arguing they lacked specific intent to kill. The text recounts interactions with Justice White and mentions a challenge from Justice Scalia.
This document appears to be page 5 of a draft manuscript for an autobiography by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. The text discusses his philosophy on writing an autobiography, comparing it to a defendant taking the stand, and contrasts his aggressive public legal persona with his private life. It mentions his son Elon, his representation of Claus Von Bulow, and the film *Reversal of Fortune*. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was gathered as evidence during a Congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein inquiry given Dershowitz's involvement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity