Alison Nathan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Moira Penza
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-26 | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell trial observations by juror Scotty David and discussion of potential mistrial g... | Court | View |
| 2021-11-23 | N/A | Final pretrial conference U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom 318, 40 Foley Square | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell likely to be formally charged and enter a plea. | New York (via videoconference) | View |
2022.08.02%20Memorandum%20Of%20Law.pdf
This document is a Supplemental Brief filed on August 1, 2022, by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The brief supports a Motion to Dismiss Ghislaine Maxwell's complaint seeking indemnification from the Estate. The Co-Executors argue that because Maxwell was convicted of intentional criminal acts (sex trafficking and conspiracy) in the Southern District of New York on June 29, 2022, public policy prohibits enforcing any contract or equitable doctrine that would indemnify her for the financial consequences of her crimes.
EFTA00031173.pdf
This document is an email chain and press guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 26, 2021, regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It details a specific interaction between journalist Dipesh Gadher of The Sunday Times and the SDNY press office concerning the identification of a victim/witness who had previously waived anonymity; the SDNY instructs that the court order requires the use of pseudonyms regardless of prior waivers. The document also includes general press guidance regarding trial logistics, the use of pseudonyms for sensitive witnesses, and access to government exhibits.
EFTA00029582.pdf
An email from the SDNY Attorney's Office providing press guidance for the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial dated November 23, 2021. The document outlines privacy measures for victim witnesses testifying under pseudonyms, details the schedule for the final pretrial conference before Judge Alison Nathan, and provides instructions for media access to exhibits and credentialing.
EFTA00029180.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Attorney Nicole Simmons submits Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus to Judge Nathan's chambers. The documents were submitted under temporary seal to allow for government redaction proposals.
EFTA00026424.pdf
This document is a Bloomberg newsletter from July 7, 2020. It covers various news items including PPP loan controversies, COVID-19 updates, and market news. Significantly, it reports that Ghislaine Maxwell, described as a former Jeffrey Epstein associate, has arrived in New York and is scheduled for a plea hearing on July 14 via videoconference.
EFTA00024892.pdf
This document is an email and attached press guidance from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the trial of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell in November 2021. It outlines the specific charges against Maxwell (Counts 1-6) and their maximum prison sentences, while also providing off-the-record guidance that certain witnesses will testify under pseudonyms to protect victim identities. The document includes logistical details for the press, such as the final pretrial conference schedule with Judge Alison Nathan and instructions for accessing government exhibits via the SDNY file share.
EFTA00024265.pdf
This document is a series of emails from an individual named Gregor Hirsch to various media outlets and government officials on December 15, 2020. Hirsch argues that beauty pageants constitute a form of sex trafficking similar to the Epstein case and petitions for Ghislaine Maxwell to be granted bail under strict security conditions he proposes. Notably, Hirsch includes a request to be employed as one of the security guards for Maxwell and alleges grooming behavior by Donald Trump at Miss Teen USA pageants.
EFTA00016489.pdf
This document is an email chain dated November 26, 2021, between Dipesh Gadher of The Sunday Times and Nicholas Biase of the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns press guidance for the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial, specifically addressing whether a certain witness (whose name is redacted) can be identified by the media. The email includes official 'Off-the-Record' press guidance detailing court logistics, the use of pseudonyms for victims, and access to government exhibits.
EFTA00016461.pdf
This document is an email dated December 4, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email submits a letter from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) legal counsel regarding the case US v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell) and notes that the government has no objection to the letter being publicly docketed despite not being filed on ECF by the MDC.
EFTA00014708.pdf
This document is an email dated November 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Alison Nathan's chambers regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The email submits proposed redactions referenced in a previous docket entry (No. 486) and includes attachments related to birth certificates and exhibit GX-52.
DOJ-OGR-00015115.jpg
This document is a letter dated August 5, 2025, addressed to Judges Engelmayer and Berman from an unnamed victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The author expresses frustration with the judicial process, specifically questioning why subpoenas have not been issued for US Virgin Islands officials or Epstein's financial staff (attorney and accountant). The letter explicitly references Leon Black's payments to Epstein and alleges Epstein's accountant removed items from the NY mansion immediately following Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00001326.jpg
This document details the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's second bail application, originally submitted on December 8, 2020. Judge Nathan ruled that Maxwell posed a significant flight risk due to her substantial resources, foreign ties (including citizenship in a non-extradition country), and lack of candor regarding her finances. The judge also noted the strength of the Government's case and the seriousness of the charges.
DOJ-OGR-00020878.jpg
This document, appearing to be a court document or news article, discusses observations made by a juror named Scotty David during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It highlights the potential for Maxwell to claim a mistrial because Scotty David, who was a victim of child sex abuse, shared his experiences with other jurors, which may not have been fully disclosed during jury selection. Legal experts weigh in on the implications of this revelation for Maxwell's conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00019295.jpg
This document is page 8 (filed as Page 9 of 15 in Document 17) of a legal filing dated September 10, 2020. It argues for the consolidation of two appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: one regarding the unsealing of deposition material in her civil case (Judge Preska) and another regarding a protective order in her criminal case (Judge Nathan). The text asserts that consolidation is required for efficiency and fairness.
DOJ-OGR-00009189.jpg
This document is a court filing containing a Reuters article printed on January 26, 2022. It details the controversy surrounding juror 'Scotty David' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, who revealed in an interview that he was a victim of sexual abuse, a fact he may not have disclosed during jury selection (voir dire). The U.S. Attorney's office wrote to Judge Alison Nathan requesting an inquiry into his service, potentially threatening the verdict. The text also details testimony from a victim named Carolyn regarding payments from Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00009100.jpg
This document is page 128 (filed on 02/24/22) of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It records Judge Nathan dismissing Juror No. 49 and beginning the questioning of Juror No. 50. The judge instructs Juror No. 50 on the presumption of innocence for Ms. Maxwell and strictly prohibits consuming media related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00019659.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated October 8, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that releasing deposition material prematurely would compromise her ability to make a 'Martindell argument' and discusses her intent to move Judge Preska to stay unsealing pending her criminal case. The text highlights a conflict where Maxwell claims she cannot fairly argue her case because Judge Preska and the appellate panel are unaware of redacted facts regarding government proceedings and subpoenas.
DOJ-OGR-00005318.jpg
This document is a transcript of Judge Alison Nathan's preliminary remarks to potential jurors in the case of United States v. Maxwell, filed on October 22, 2021. The judge welcomes the jury pool to the Southern District of New York and outlines the two-phase jury selection process, which includes filling out a questionnaire and potential in-person questioning starting in mid-November.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity