DOJ-OGR-00019295.jpg
475 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / appellate brief
File Size:
475 KB
Summary
This document is page 8 (filed as Page 9 of 15 in Document 17) of a legal filing dated September 10, 2020. It argues for the consolidation of two appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: one regarding the unsealing of deposition material in her civil case (Judge Preska) and another regarding a protective order in her criminal case (Judge Nathan). The text asserts that consolidation is required for efficiency and fairness.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the appeals mentioned in the document.
|
| Loretta Preska | Judge |
Issued an order unsealing deposition material in the civil case.
|
| Alison Nathan | Judge |
Issued an order denying the motion to modify the criminal protective order.
|
| Virginia Giuffre | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Referred to as '2d Cir.' and 'This Court'.
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Inferred from Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-09-10
Filing of legal argument regarding consolidation of appeals.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Relationships (2)
Cited case Giuffre v. Maxwell
Cited case United States v. Maxwell
Key Quotes (3)
"Ms. Maxwell has appealed Judge Preska’s order unsealing the deposition material... and she is now appealing Judge Nathan’s order denying the motion to modify the criminal protective order."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019295.jpg
Quote #1
"This Court should consolidate the appeal of Judge Preska’s order unsealing the deposition material with the appeal of Judge Nathan’s order..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019295.jpg
Quote #2
"Consolidation is necessary for a fair and efficient resolution of these appeals."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019295.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (916 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 17, 09/10/2020, 2928288, Page9 of 15
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Ms. Maxwell has appealed Judge Preska’s order unsealing the deposition
material, Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 20-2413 (2d Cir.), and she is now appealing
Judge Nathan’s order denying the motion to modify the criminal protective order,
United States v. Maxwell, Case No. 20-3061 (2d Cir.).
material, Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 20-2413 (2d Cir.), and she is now appealing
Judge Nathan’s order denying the motion to modify the criminal protective order,
United States v. Maxwell, Case No. 20-3061 (2d Cir.).
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Argument
This Court should consolidate the appeal of Judge Preska’s order unsealing
the deposition material with the appeal of Judge Nathan’s order denying the
motion to modify the criminal protective order. Consolidation is necessary for a fair
and efficient resolution of these appeals.
the deposition material with the appeal of Judge Nathan’s order denying the
motion to modify the criminal protective order. Consolidation is necessary for a fair
and efficient resolution of these appeals.
First, unless this Court consolidates these appeals, it will find itself in the
very same position as the two district courts—one panel of this Court will be privy
very same position as the two district courts—one panel of this Court will be privy
8
DOJ-OGR-00019295
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document