| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Association denied |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Subject of subpoena |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael S. Reiter
|
Professional referral |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's Office
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Office of Professional Responsibility
|
Oversight review |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
LLC
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Radar Online
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nine East 71st Street Corporation
|
Investigative subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Maple
|
Investigative subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Office of the Inspector General
|
Oversight coordination |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sprint Nextel Corporate Security
|
Correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's Office
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Witness Loftus consulted with various government agencies at different points in their career. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation that was the subject of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation that was the subject of Epstein's NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Document withholding | Withholding of pages with Bates references 03956-11026-11027 and 03956-11028-11029 as part of Civ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted into the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | The subject must agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of In... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Publication | The Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum about their inv... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Memorandum issuance | The [DOJ] and [FBI] issued a memorandum describing a review of investigative holdings relating to... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Document release | A memorandum was released by the DOJ/FBI, which led to public and congressional dissatisfaction a... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-02 | Arrest | The Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) arrested the defendant. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-31 | Document release | Release of the FOI/PA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET. | N/A | View |
| 2019-06-28 | Witness contact | Additional individuals contacted the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office expressing a willingness ... | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-10 | Criminal investigation | The FBI is conducting a thorough investigation into a crime in which the recipient of the letter ... | Jurisdiction of FBI - West ... | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Victim identification | S.R. was identified as a victim via the FBI's investigation. | N/A | View |
| 2006-08-28 | Investigation | An ongoing federal crime investigation in which the recipient of the letter is considered a possi... | West Palm Beach, FL jurisdi... | View |
| 2006-01-01 | Investigation | The federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein was initiated at the request of the Palm Beach Pol... | N/A | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Investigation | The United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted their own i... | United States | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Investigation | An investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's background and any offenses committed against the United ... | United States | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Investigation | A joint investigation by the USAO-SDFL and the Federal Bureau of Investigation into federal crime... | N/A | View |
This document is the first page of a Non-Prosecution Agreement concerning Jeffrey Epstein, filed on April 16, 2021. It outlines that both state (City of Palm Beach Police, State Attorney's Office) and federal (U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI) authorities have conducted investigations into Epstein. The federal investigation covered offenses from 2001 to September 2007, including conspiracy and substantive charges related to persuading and transporting minors across state lines for prostitution and illicit sexual conduct.
This document is a page from a legal filing detailing an investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) into a significant gap in the email records of an individual named Acosta, specifically from May 2007 to April 2008. The investigation, which was related to the Epstein case, involved questioning witnesses and analyzing data from multiple U.S. Attorney's Offices, the FBI, and other Justice Department divisions. OPR concluded that the email gap was most likely due to a technological error rather than an intentional act to conceal evidence.
This letter, dated January 10, 2008, is from the FBI's West Palm Beach office to an individual identified as a crime victim. It serves to officially notify the victim that a case is under investigation, outlines their specific rights under federal law (18 U.S.C. § 3771), and provides information on how to use the Victim Notification System (VNS) for case updates.
This document is an organizational chart for the U.S. Department of Justice, depicting its structure for the period of 2006-2008. It outlines the hierarchy of leadership, starting with the Attorney General, and shows the various divisions, bureaus, and offices that fall under the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General. The chart provides a comprehensive overview of the department's components and their reporting relationships during that time.
This document, a page from a legal filing, outlines the structure and function of the U.S. Department of Justice and its key components. It details the mission of the Department, the role of the 94 U.S. Attorney's Offices in prosecuting federal crimes, and the oversight structure involving the Attorney General. The text also highlights specialized units within the Criminal Division, such as the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), and their role in assisting federal prosecutors.
This document is the table of contents for a report, likely from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), concerning the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the report's structure, which covers the factual background, the roles of various federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies (including the DOJ, FBI, and Palm Beach Police), the controversial non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and the timeline of the initial investigation from 2005-2006.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus testifies about the funding sources for their scientific research, identifying the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Mental Health as supporters. They also list several U.S. government agencies they have consulted for, including the Department of Justice, CIA, FBI, and IRS.
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) outlining the procedural history of charges against the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). It details the timeline of indictments from June 2020 through March 2021, listing eight specific counts including conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts (1994-2004), sex trafficking (2001-2004), and perjury.
This document is page 14 of a juror questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. Juror ID 50 indicates they have no professional, business, or social associations with either the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus discusses the funding for their scientific research, citing support from the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Mental Health. They also state that they have consulted for numerous U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Justice, CIA, FBI, Secret Service, and IRS.
This document is page 15 of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) for a legal case, filed on March 24, 2022. The prospective juror denies having any professional, business, or social associations with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) does not immunize the defendant, Maxwell, from prosecution. The argument is based on two points: the NPA's scope is strictly limited to specific federal crimes committed between 2001 and 2007, and the mere mention of "co-conspirator" does not automatically include Maxwell within the agreement's protections.
This document outlines the terms of a legal agreement between the United States Attorney's Office and Epstein, deferring federal prosecution in favor of state prosecution in Florida. It specifies conditions Epstein must follow, consequences for violating the agreement, and the promise of dismissal of charges upon successful fulfillment of terms. The agreement is authorized by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta.
This document is page two of a legal agreement outlining the deferral of federal prosecution against Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Under the authority of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, the federal case will be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, provided Epstein adheres to the agreement's conditions. The text also specifies the procedures for initiating federal prosecution should Epstein violate the terms.
This document is Page 2 of 7 of the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (headed by R. Alexander Acosta). It outlines that federal prosecution will be deferred in favor of state prosecution if Epstein abides by specific conditions. Crucially, the final paragraph grants broad immunity, stating that after fulfilling terms, no federal prosecution will occur for offenses investigated by the FBI or the Federal Grand Jury.
This document is the first page of a Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding Jeffrey Epstein, filed on September 25, 2017. It outlines the basis for the agreement, citing investigations by both Florida state authorities (Palm Beach Police, State Attorney's Office) and federal agencies (U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI). The investigations covered state charges of solicitation of prostitution and federal offenses related to conspiring to entice minors into prostitution between approximately 2001 and September 2007.
This document is page 26 of a juror questionnaire for federal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions designed to identify potential conflicts of interest or bias by asking a prospective juror about their associations with law enforcement and legal entities. Specifically, it inquires about connections to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, the FBI, and the NYPD.
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire from a federal criminal case, filed on October 22, 2021. It poses questions to a potential juror to determine if they have any personal or professional associations with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The questionnaire also seeks to understand if any such relationships would impact their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror.
This legal filing details the government's interactions with Minor Victim-4, who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) between 2001 and 2004. It highlights that the defendant personally paid the victim following sexual encounters with Epstein and outlines the victim's interviews with the FBI in 2007 and prosecutors in 2020 and 2021. The document also mentions a photo identification procedure conducted in June 2021.
This is an internal FBI administrative document dated November 9, 2006, from the West Palm Beach Resident Agency to the Miami Field Office. It requests holiday pay for a Special Agent working on Veteran's Day (November 10, 2006) to gather data for an 'Intelligent Analyst' arriving the following Monday regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically labeled 'WSTA - CHILD PROSTITUTION'.
An FBI internal memorandum dated September 14, 2006, from the West Palm Beach Resident Agency to the Miami office. The document serves as a case update to report that the investigation (presumably related to Epstein given the context of the collection, though the Case ID is redacted) is 'Pending Inactive' and has been delayed because the handling agent was reassigned to a kidnapping investigation on January 17, 2006.
This document is an FBI Deleted Page Information Sheet related to Civil Action 17-cv-03956 (likely FOIA litigation). It lists 258 pages that were completely withheld from release, citing various FOIA exemptions including b3 (statutory), b6 (privacy), b7C (law enforcement privacy), b7D (confidential sources), and b7E (law enforcement techniques).
This FBI internal document from the Albuquerque office to the Miami office, dated February 15, 2007, reports on an investigative lead regarding Jeffrey Epstein under a child prostitution case. It details that an interview was conducted with a redacted individual on February 8, 2007, at Epstein's property at 49 Zorro Ranch Road in Stanley, New Mexico. The document serves to transmit the FD-302 (interview report) and notes to the primary office in Miami.
This FBI document from the Miami Field Office, dated December 20, 2006, details the creation of 16 'i2 Analyst Notebook Charts' by an Intelligence Assistant. These charts tracked the 'target's' (implied to be Epstein) arrival and departure dates alongside phone records from February 10, 2005, to October 6, 2005. The analysis specifically correlated the target's physical movements with their telecommunications activity immediately before, during, and after travel.
This FBI document, dated November 13, 2006 (though referencing a December phone call, suggesting a typo or later drafting), is a request from the Miami/Palm Beach County office for travel concurrence to New York and Newark. The purpose is for agents and an Assistant US Attorney to interview pertinent witnesses regarding the investigation into 'multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein' for 'Child Prostitution' (WSTA), which was opened on July 24, 2006. The travel is scheduled for December 14-17, 2006.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity