DOJ-OGR-00021189.jpg
729 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
9
Organizations
3
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Table of contents
File Size:
729 KB
Summary
This document is the table of contents for a report, likely from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), concerning the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the report's structure, which covers the factual background, the roles of various federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies (including the DOJ, FBI, and Palm Beach Police), the controversial non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and the timeline of the initial investigation from 2005-2006.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of investigation |
Mentioned as the subject of the case and investigation, along with his defense attorneys.
|
| Reiter | PBPD Chief |
Mentioned as PBPD Chief Reiter, who became concerned with the State Attorney's Office's handling of the investigation.
|
Organizations (9)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OPR | Government agency |
Referenced throughout the executive summary regarding its investigation, analytical framework, findings, and conclusi...
|
| District Court | Judicial body |
Mentioned in the context of its conclusion that the USAO violated the CVRA.
|
| USAO | Government agency |
Mentioned as having been found by the District Court to have violated the CVRA. Likely stands for U.S. Attorney's Off...
|
| The Department of Justice | Government agency |
Listed as one of the federal law enforcement agencies involved.
|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida | Government agency |
Listed as one of the federal law enforcement agencies involved.
|
| Federal Bureau of Investigation | Government agency |
Listed as one of the federal law enforcement agencies involved.
|
| PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT | Law enforcement agency |
Mentioned as one of the agencies that investigated Epstein from March 2005 to May 2006. Abbreviated as PBPD.
|
| PALM BEACH COUNTY STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE | Government agency |
Mentioned as one of the agencies that investigated Epstein and handled the state investigation.
|
| State Grand Jury | Judicial body |
Mentioned as the body to which the State Attorney's Office decided to present the case.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2005-03 - 2006-05
Jeffrey Epstein is investigated by the Palm Beach Police Department and the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office.
Palm Beach County
The State Attorney's Office decides to present the case to a State Grand Jury.
Florida
PBPD Chief Reiter seeks a federal investigation due to concerns over the state's handling of the case.
PBPD Chief Reiter
PALM BEACH COUNTY STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the jurisdiction of the U.S. Attorney's Office involved.
|
|
|
The location of the State Attorney's Office investigating Epstein.
|
|
|
Mentioned in relation to the state procedure for bringing criminal charges and the location of the Southern District.
|
Relationships (2)
The table of contents lists a section titled 'JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND HIS DEFENSE ATTORNEYS'.
PBPD Chief Reiter
→
Professional
→
State Attorney’s Office
The document states that 'PBPD Chief Reiter Becomes Concerned with the State Attorney’s Office’s Handling of the State Investigation'.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,431 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 77, 06/29/2023, 3536038, Page17 of 258
SA-15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 15 of 348
SA-15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 15 of 348
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... i
I. OVERVIEW OF FACTUAL BACKGROUND .................................................................... i
II. THE INITIATION AND SCOPE OF OPR’S INVESTIGATION........................................v
III. OVERVIEW OF OPR’S ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK.................................................. vii
IV. ISSUES CONSIDERED.................................................................................................... viii
A. The Negotiation, Execution, and Implementation of the NPA ............................ viii
B. The District Court’s Conclusion That the USAO Violated the CVRA ................ ix
V. OPR’S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS......................................................................... ix
A. Findings and Conclusions Relating to the NPA .................................................... ix
B. Findings and Conclusions Relating to the Government’s Interactions
with Victims...........................................................................................................x
VI. ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT ............................................................................... xii
CHAPTER ONE: SIGNIFICANT ENTITIES AND INDIVIDUALS................................................ 1
I. THE FEDERAL AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ................................ 1
A. The Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the
Southern District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation..................1
B. The State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies....................................................4
II. THE SUBJECT ATTORNEYS AND THEIR ROLES IN THE EPSTEIN CASE................ 4
III. JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND HIS DEFENSE ATTORNEYS................................................... 8
A. Jeffrey Epstein ........................................................................................................8
B. Epstein’s Defense Attorneys....................................................................................8
CHAPTER TWO: THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT ................................................... 11
PART ONE: FACTUAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 11
I. OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 11
II. MARCH 2005 – MAY 2006: EPSTEIN IS INVESTIGATED BY THE PALM
BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE ....................................................................................... 11
A. The Initial Allegations and the PBPD Investigation............................................. 11
B. The State Attorney’s Office Decides to Present the Case to a State
Grand Jury............................................................................................................14
C. Florida State Procedure for Bringing Criminal Charges.......................................15
D. PBPD Chief Reiter Becomes Concerned with the State Attorney’s Office’s
Handling of the State Investigation and Seeks a Federal Investigation..............16
I. OVERVIEW OF FACTUAL BACKGROUND .................................................................... i
II. THE INITIATION AND SCOPE OF OPR’S INVESTIGATION........................................v
III. OVERVIEW OF OPR’S ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK.................................................. vii
IV. ISSUES CONSIDERED.................................................................................................... viii
A. The Negotiation, Execution, and Implementation of the NPA ............................ viii
B. The District Court’s Conclusion That the USAO Violated the CVRA ................ ix
V. OPR’S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS......................................................................... ix
A. Findings and Conclusions Relating to the NPA .................................................... ix
B. Findings and Conclusions Relating to the Government’s Interactions
with Victims...........................................................................................................x
VI. ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT ............................................................................... xii
CHAPTER ONE: SIGNIFICANT ENTITIES AND INDIVIDUALS................................................ 1
I. THE FEDERAL AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ................................ 1
A. The Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the
Southern District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation..................1
B. The State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies....................................................4
II. THE SUBJECT ATTORNEYS AND THEIR ROLES IN THE EPSTEIN CASE................ 4
III. JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND HIS DEFENSE ATTORNEYS................................................... 8
A. Jeffrey Epstein ........................................................................................................8
B. Epstein’s Defense Attorneys....................................................................................8
CHAPTER TWO: THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT ................................................... 11
PART ONE: FACTUAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 11
I. OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 11
II. MARCH 2005 – MAY 2006: EPSTEIN IS INVESTIGATED BY THE PALM
BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE ....................................................................................... 11
A. The Initial Allegations and the PBPD Investigation............................................. 11
B. The State Attorney’s Office Decides to Present the Case to a State
Grand Jury............................................................................................................14
C. Florida State Procedure for Bringing Criminal Charges.......................................15
D. PBPD Chief Reiter Becomes Concerned with the State Attorney’s Office’s
Handling of the State Investigation and Seeks a Federal Investigation..............16
xiii
DOJ-OGR-00021189
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document