Trove
Sign In Sign Up

HHS (Department of Health and Human Services)

Organization
Mentions
19
Relationships
0
Events
2
Documents
7
Also known as:
Department of Health and Human Services VICE DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... N/A View
N/A N/A Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... Not specified View

EFTA00021202.pdf

This June 26, 2019 edition of The Daily 202 newsletter highlights Robert Mueller's upcoming congressional testimony regarding his report on Russian interference and potential obstruction of justice. It also covers significant national news including the humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexico border, tensions with Iran, the 2020 Democratic primary debates, and various political developments involving the Trump administration. The document provides analysis, key quotes, and links to further reading on these topics.

The daily 202 email newsletter from the washington post
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024711.jpg

This document is page 75 of a 2017 report by Ackrell Capital, LLC, titled 'Chapter IV U.S. Legal Landscape.' It details FDA regulations regarding 'off-label' prescriptions and specifically analyzes 'Cannabinoid-Based Drugs' such as Marinol, Syndros, Cesamet, Sativex, and Epidiolex. It discusses their scheduling under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and the status of their FDA approvals as of October 2017. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024711' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.

Investment research report / legal analysis (page 75)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021382.jpg

This document is page 136 of a larger report, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It contains the conclusion of a section discussing the psychological mechanics of loneliness versus social isolation, followed by a list of academic references (citations 1-12) related to sociology, epidemiology, and psychology. While marked as part of an oversight investigation (likely related to Epstein's scientific funding or connections), the page itself contains only bibliography and academic text without mentioning Epstein directly.

Academic paper / congressional oversight production
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020384.jpg

This document is page 232 of a report, consisting of endnotes for a chapter titled 'The Crime Scene Investigation'. The citations reference sources used to detail the investigation into Edward Snowden's leak of classified information from the NSA, covering events from 2013 to 2015. Despite the user's query, this document page contains no information, names, or keywords related to Jeffrey Epstein; its content is exclusively about the Snowden affair.

Endnotes/citations from a report, likely a government publication as indicated by the 'house oversight' footer.
2025-11-17
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012384.jpg

This document is page 13 of a letter from Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski to members of several congressional committees. The letter proposes an amendment to the "2005 reauthorization" to mandate collaboration between the Departments of Health and Human Services, Justice (Attorney General), and Homeland Security regarding a pilot program for victims. The letter states that the Office of Management and Budget has no objection to this proposal on behalf of the Administration.

Official government correspondence / letter
2025-11-17
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012379.jpg

This Department of Justice (DOJ) document outlines the department's opposition to several proposed legislative amendments concerning human trafficking, specifically sections 214 and 221 of an unspecified bill. The DOJ argues that the changes are redundant, create legally problematic strict liability offenses without an affirmative defense, and improperly federalize crimes like pandering and pimping that are historically handled at the state level. The DOJ asserts that its existing authority under laws like the Mann Act is sufficient for prosecuting federal trafficking crimes.

Department of justice (doj) legislative analysis
2025-11-17
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012378.jpg

This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis and opposition to Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims, likely from around 2008. The DOJ argues the bill's grant authorizations are redundant, create conflicts of interest with NGOs, improperly involve the Department of State in domestic issues, and wrongly extend victim benefits to prostitutes under the Mann Act who do not meet the legal definition of a victim unless under 18.

Doj legislative analysis memo
2025-11-17
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search