| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Parrish
|
Prosecutor defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Author
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Linda Lovelace
|
Co actors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution and conviction of Harry Reems for his role in 'Deep Throat'. | Memphis | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filming of the movie Deep Throat. | Unknown | View |
| 1970-01-01 | N/A | Filming of Deep Throat | Movie Set | View |
| 1970-01-01 | N/A | Harry Reems conviction vacated and indictment dismissed. | Memphis/Federal Court | View |
| 0019-03-01 | N/A | Death of Harry Reems. | Salt Lake City | View |
This document is a Table of Contents for a book manuscript, dated April 2, 2012, with a House Oversight stamp. The text outlines an autobiography covering the author's life from Brooklyn to Yale, clerkships with Judge Bazelon and Justice Goldberg, and a legal career focused on the First Amendment, addressing topics such as the Pentagon Papers, Wikileaks, and pornography cases like 'Deep Throat' and 'I Am Curious Yellow'. Based on the specific clerkships and career trajectory described, the manuscript appears to be by Alan Dershowitz.
This document appears to be a page (257) from a book manuscript or draft dated April 2, 2012. The text is a legal analysis, likely by a law professor (contextually Alan Dershowitz), discussing the legal concept of 'mistake of fact' in rape cases. The author uses the filming of *Deep Throat* and a case involving Hmong marriage traditions in California as examples to argue that reasonable mistakes regarding consent should be considered in legal judgments.
This document is a page from a book manuscript (Chapter 12), likely written by Alan Dershowitz, discussing the legal defense of Ricky and Raymond Tison. It details the 'felony-murder' rule and the author's decision to represent the brothers pro bono in their appeal against the death penalty in Arizona. The text outlines the background of the case, where the brothers helped their father escape prison but did not personally kill anyone during the subsequent murders.
This document appears to be a page (117) from a book manuscript or legal draft, likely authored by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the 'House Oversight' Bates stamp collection. The text argues against the censorship of pornography, critiquing a definition proposed by 'radical feminists' as too vague and potentially encompassing classic literature. The author posits that political censorship and the suppression of state secrets pose a greater threat to democracy than obscenity.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of 'Deep Throat', Harvard's Quincy House, and the legal defense style, though his name is not explicitly in the text) included in House Oversight files. It details a court hearing where a Judge Alberti viewed the film 'Deep Throat' to determine if it was obscene under Massachusetts law, ultimately deciding it was 'trash' but not legally obscene. The narrative concludes with the author addressing protesters and students at Quincy House regarding free speech rights.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the 'pornocrat lawyer' and 'Harvard Square deli' context) included in House Oversight materials. It discusses the controversy surrounding the film *Deep Throat*, contrasting Gloria Steinem's view of Linda Lovelace as a victim with actor Harry Reems' claim that Lovelace was a willing participant. The text details the author's conversation with Reems and the subsequent feminist backlash and boycotts against the author for representing industry figures.
This document is a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) produced in the House Oversight investigation. It details Dershowitz's legal defense of actor Harry Reems regarding the film 'Deep Throat,' noting the eventual dismissal of the case by the Justice Department. It also recounts a separate incident at Harvard involving the Quincy House Film Society showing the same film to raise funds for a screen damaged during a showing of 'Animal House,' which drew protests from female students.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz) discussing the legal defense of actor Harry Reems in the 'Deep Throat' obscenity case. The text details the prosecutor's (Parrish) motivations, Dershowitz's decision to take the case pro bono, and the strategy to win in the 'court of public opinion' by garnering support from mainstream celebrities and The New York Times. The page bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of a document production.
The author recounts their legal involvement in obscenity cases, specifically discussing their strategic decision not to watch the film Deep Throat while defending the principle of choice. The text details the prosecution of actor Harry Reems for conspiracy related to the film, highlighting the government's aggressive legal theory regarding conspiracy liability.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated April 2, 2012) of a book, likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific legal history and cases mentioned (Harry Reems, bestiality defense, etc.). The text discusses the evolution of the First Amendment, contrasting it with Charlton Heston's views on the Second Amendment, and lists the controversial types of speech the author has defended. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein case in which Dershowitz was involved.
This document is a list of obituaries for notable individuals who died between March 15 and March 23 (historically 2013). It includes high-profile figures such as Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky, French lawyer Olivier Metzner, and author Chinua Achebe. The document contains a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013281), suggesting it was included as part of an evidentiary production.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Harry Reems | Alan Dershowitz | $0.00 | Reems told Dershowitz he had no money; Dershowi... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Harry Reems | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | $0.00 | Legal 'fee' consisting of a signed photograph. | View |
Reems asked Dershowitz to argue his appeal pro bono.
Author asked Reems if Lovelace was forced into performing; Reems denied it.
To Alan Dershowitz who me everything I know.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity