This legal document, a letter from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, dated March 7, 2013, argues for a lower sentencing guideline for their client, Mr. Parse. The firm contends that since Mr. Parse was only convicted of three "backdating" transactions, sentencing enhancements for "sophisticated means" and "special skills" are unwarranted, as he did not design the underlying complex tax shelters. The letter provides a total loss calculation of $3,807,988 based on IRS assessments related to the transactions.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Exhibit A-5922 within Case 1:20-cr-00330, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell case) containing a legal argument. The text discusses a tax fraud case involving David Parse, Carrie Yackee, Jenkins & Gilchrist, and Deutsche Bank, focusing on whether Parse knew transactions were made solely for tax losses rather than investment purposes. This appears to be a citation of case law (likely U.S. v. Daugerdas) used as a precedent within the broader filing, rather than a direct record of Epstein's activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity